The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The basic reproduction number (R0) of measles: a systematic review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Schünemann, H. J., Tugwell, P., & Knottnerus, A. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011 · Cited by 3,094
Guidelines for accurate and transparent health estimates reporting: the GATHER statement
Stevens, G. A., Alkema, L., Black, R. E., Boerma, J. T., Collins, G. S., Ezzati, M., Grove, J. T., Hogan, D. R., Hogan, M. C., Horton, R., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30388-9 · Cited by 1,798
A New Framework and Software to Estimate Time-Varying Reproduction Numbers During Epidemics
Cori, A., Ferguson, N. M., Fraser, C., & Cauchemez, S. (2013) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwt133 · Cited by 1,530
The R0 package: a toolbox to estimate reproduction numbers for epidemic outbreaks
Obadia, T., Haneef, R., & Boëlle, P.-Y. (2012) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-147 · Cited by 300
Cited by
Airborne transmission of respiratory viruses
Wang, C. C., Prather, K. A., Sznitman, J., Jimenez, J. L., Lakdawala, S. S., Tufekci, Z., & Marr, L. C. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abd9149 · Cited by 1,543
Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2
Greenhalgh, T., Jimenez, J. L., Prather, K. A., Tufekci, Z., Fisman, D., & Schooley, R. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00869-2 · Cited by 930
Transmissibility and transmission of respiratory viruses
Leung, N. H. L. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00535-6 · Cited by 890
Billah, M. A., Miah, M. M., & Khan, M. N. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0242128 · Cited by 260
What policy makers need to know about COVID-19 protective immunity
Altmann, D. M., Douek, D. C., & Boyton, R. J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30985-5 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Guerra, F. M., Bolotin, S., Lim, G., Heffernan, J., Deeks, S. L., Li, Y., & Crowcroft, N. S.
- Venue
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- e420-e428
- ISSN
- 1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2739789502
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The basic reproduction number (R0) of measles: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30307-9
- The paper
- Guerra, F. M., Bolotin, S., Lim, G., Heffernan, J., Deeks, S. L., Li, Y., & Crowcroft, N. S. (2017). The basic reproduction number (R0) of measles: a systematic review. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30307-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
