Cited by 1,530COVID-19 epidemiological studiesMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsData-Driven Disease Surveillance

A New Framework and Software to Estimate Time-Varying Reproduction Numbers During Epidemics

Open access
Cori, Anne, Ferguson, Neil M., Fraser, Christophe, Cauchemez, Simon·2013·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The quantification of transmissibility during epidemics is essential to designing and adjusting public health responses. Transmissibility can be measured by the reproduction number R, the average number of secondary cases caused by an infected individual. Several methods have been proposed to estimate R over the course of an epidemic; however, they are usually difficult to implement for people without a strong background in statistical modeling. Here, we present a ready-to-use tool for estimating R from incidence time series, which is implemented in popular software including Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington). This tool produces novel, statistically robust analytical estimates of R and incorporates uncertainty in the distribution of the serial interval (the time between the onset of symptoms in a primary case and the onset of symptoms in secondary cases). We applied the method to 5 historical outbreaks; the resulting estimates of R are consistent with those presented in the literature. This tool should help epidemiologists quantify temporal changes in the transmission intensity of future epidemics by using surveillance data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwt133

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cori, A., Ferguson, N. M., Fraser, C., & Cauchemez, S.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
Corresponding author
Cori, Anne
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2013-09-15
Volume
178
Issue
9
Pages
1505-1512
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2097446414
Cited by
1,530
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 161 · 2023: 199 · 2022: 268 · 2021: 328 · 2020: 262 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Imperial College London
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K010174/1, G0800596)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Keywords
time-varying reproduction number, analytical estimation, transmission intensity, public health response
MeSH terms
Humans, Software, Time Factors, Virus Diseases, Models, Statistical, Incidence, Epidemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review