Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association between microcephaly, Zika virus infection, and other risk factors in Brazil: final report of a case-control study

Open access
de Araújo, Thalia Velho Barreto, Ximenes, Ricardo Arraes de Alencar, Miranda-Filho, Demócrito de Barros, Souza, Wayner Vieira, Montarroyos, Ulisses Ramos, de Melo, Ana Paula Lopes, Valongueiro, Sandra, de Albuquerque, Maria de Fátima Pessoa Militão, Braga, Cynthia, Filho, Sinval Pinto Brandão, Cordeiro, Marli Tenório, Vazquez, Enrique, Cruz, Danielle di Cavalcanti Souza, Henriques, Claudio Maierovitch Pessanha, Bezerra, Luciana Caroline Albuquerque, Castanha, Priscila Mayrelle da Silva, Dhalia, Rafael, Marques-Júnior, Ernesto Torres Azevedo, Martelli, Celina Maria Turchi, Rodrigues, Laura Cunha, Dhalia, Carmen, Santos, Marcela, Cortes, Fanny, Kleber de Oliveira, Wanderson, Evelim Coelho, Giovanini, Cortez-Escalante, Juan Jose, Campelo de Albuquerque de Melo, Carlos Frederico, Ramon-Pardo, Pilar, Aldighieri, Sylvain, Mendez-Rico, Jairo, Espinal, Marcos, Torres, Leuridan, Nassri Hazin, Adriano, Van der Linden, Ana, Coentro, Monica, Santiago Dimech, George, Siqueira de Assuncao, Romildo, Ismael de Carvalho, Patricia, Felix Oliveira, Valdete·2018·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Summary Background A study of the cause of the epidemic microcephaly in Brazil, including congenital Zika virus infection and other potential causes. Methods Prospective case-control study in Recife/Brazil. Cases: neonates with microcephaly born in public maternities. Controls (without microcephaly) matched by expected date of delivery and area of residence. Laboratory tests: Serum of cases/ controls and cerebrospinal fluid of cases (qRT-PCR and anti-Zika-IgM); tissues of stillbirth cases qRT-PCR). Maternal serum (PRNT for Zika and dengue). The association between microcephaly and ZIKV infection quantified using exact conditional logistic regression. Findings We included 91 cases and 173 controls. Congenital ZIKV infection was confirmed in 32/91 cases compared to 0/173 controls. 83%(68/83) of cases were small for gestational age; 5%(8/173) of controls. The overall matched odds ratio (mOR) was 87 (95%CI:15·6-∞), and 73·1(95%CI:13·0-∞) when adjusted. No controls had laboratory confirmed Zika. Neither vaccinations during pregnancy nor larvicide use was associated with microcephaly. mORs in subgroups were: severe microcephay 52·4 (95%CI:9·1-∞); less severe 33·7 (95%CI:5·6-∞); abnormal brain image 32·2 (95%CI:5·3-∞), and normal brain image 29·3 (95%CI:4·8-∞). About half cases (49/91) had either laboratory confirmation of Zika or typical brain imaging abnormalities but only 15% (12/79) had both. Interpretation Congenital Zika infection caused the microcephaly epidemic in Brazil. Neither larvicides nor vaccinations during pregnancy increased the risk of microcephaly. Neither negative Zika laboratory results nor normal brain image alone is sufficient to discard Zika as a cause of individual cases of microcephaly. Source of funding The study was funded by the Brazilian Ministry of Health and the Pan American Health Organization and AREAS. Some of the investigators received partial support from the National Advisory Board of Scientific and Technological Development (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [CNPq]; scholarship 306708/2014-0 to CMTM, 308818/2013-0 to RAAX, 308590/2013-9 to DBMF, 308491/2013-0 to MFPMA, 304174/2014-9 to CB, and 306222/2013-2 to WVS). LCR is partially funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Zika-PLAN (grant agreement No. 734584).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30727-2

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
de Araújo, T. V. B., Ximenes, R. A. D. A., Miranda-Filho, D. D. B., Souza, W. V., Montarroyos, U. R., de Melo, A. P. L., Valongueiro, S., de Albuquerque, M. D. F. P. M., Braga, C., Filho, S. P. B., Cordeiro, M. T., Vazquez, E., Cruz, D. D. C. S., Henriques, C. M. P., Bezerra, L. C. A., Castanha, P. M. D. S., Dhalia, R., Marques-Júnior, E. T. A., Martelli, C. M. T., Rodrigues, L. C., Dhalia, C., Santos, M., Cortes, F., Kleber de Oliveira, W., Evelim Coelho, G., Cortez-Escalante, J. J., Campelo de Albuquerque de Melo, C. F., Ramon-Pardo, P., Aldighieri, S., Mendez-Rico, J., Espinal, M., Torres, L., Nassri Hazin, A., Van der Linden, A., Coentro, M., Santiago Dimech, G., Siqueira de Assuncao, R., Ismael de Carvalho, P., & Felix Oliveira, V.
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
328-336
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771128043
Cited by
384
References
27
FWCI
36.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association between microcephaly, Zika virus infection, and other risk factors in Brazil: final report of a case-control study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30727-2
The paper
de Araújo, T. V. B., Ximenes, R. A. D. A., Miranda-Filho, D. D. B., Souza, W. V., Montarroyos, U. R., de Melo, A. P. L., Valongueiro, S., de Albuquerque, M. D. F. P. M., Braga, C., Filho, S. P. B., Cordeiro, M. T., Vazquez, E., Cruz, D. D. C. S., Henriques, C. M. P., Bezerra, L. C. A., Castanha, P. M. D. S., Dhalia, R., Marques-Júnior, E. T. A., Martelli, C. M. T., . . . Felix Oliveira, V. (2018). Association between microcephaly, Zika virus infection, and other risk factors in Brazil: final report of a case-control study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30727-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.