Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy adults aged 60 years and older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial
Open accessAbstract
Background A vaccine against COVID-19 is urgently needed for older adults, in whom morbidity and mortality due to the disease are increased. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a candidate COVID-19 vaccine, CoronaVac, containing inactivated SARS-CoV-2, in adults aged 60 years and older. Methods We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial of CoronaVac in healthy adults aged 60 years and older in Renqiu (Hebei, China). Vaccine or placebo was given by intramuscular injection in two doses (days 0 and 28). Phase 1 comprised a dose-escalation study, in which participants were allocated to two blocks: block 1 (3 μg inactivated virus in 0·5 mL of aluminium hydroxide solution per injection) and block 2 (6 μg per injection). Within each block, participants were randomly assigned (2:1) using block randomisation to receive CoronaVac or placebo (aluminium hydroxide solution only). In phase 2, participants were randomly assigned (2:2:2:1) using block randomisation to receive either CoronaVac at 1·5 μg, 3 μg, or 6 μg per dose, or placebo. All participants, investigators, and laboratory staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary safety endpoint was adverse reactions within 28 days after each injection in all participants who received at least one dose. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was seroconversion rate at 28 days after the second injection (which was assessed in all participants who had received the two doses of vaccine according to their random assignment, had antibody results available, and did not violate the trial protocol). Seroconversion was defined as a change from seronegative at baseline to seropositive for neutralising antibodies to live SARS-CoV-2 (positive cutoff titre 1/8), or a four-fold titre increase if the participant was seropositive at baseline. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04383574). Findings Between May 22 and June 1, 2020, 72 participants (24 in each intervention group and 24 in the placebo group; mean age 65·8 years [SD 4·8]) were enrolled in phase 1, and between June 12 and June 15, 2020, 350 participants were enrolled in phase 2 (100 in each intervention group and 50 in the placebo group; mean age 66·6 years [SD 4·7] in 349 participants). In the safety populations from both phases, any adverse reaction within 28 days after injection occurred in 20 (20%) of 100 participants in the 1·5 μg group, 25 (20%) of 125 in the 3 μg group, 27 (22%) of 123 in the 6 μg group, and 15 (21%) of 73 in the placebo group. All adverse reactions were mild or moderate in severity and injection site pain (39 [9%] of 421 participants) was the most frequently reported event. As of Aug 28, 2020, eight serious adverse events, considered unrelated to vaccination, have been reported by seven (2%) participants. In phase 1, seroconversion after the second dose was observed in 24 of 24 participants (100·0% [95% CI 85·8-100·0]) in the 3 μg group and 22 of 23 (95·7% [78·1-99·9]) in the 6 μg group. In phase 2, seroconversion was seen in 88 of 97 participants in the 1·5 μg group (90·7% [83·1-95·7]), 96 of 98 in the 3 μg group (98·0% [92·8-99·8]), and 97 of 98 (99·0% [94·5-100·0]) in the 6 μg group. There were no detectable antibody responses in the placebo groups. Interpretation CoronaVac is safe and well tolerated in older adults. Neutralising antibody titres induced by the 3 μg dose were similar to those of the 6 μg dose, and higher than those of the 1·5 μg dose, supporting the use of the 3 μg dose CoronaVac in phase 3 trials to assess protection against COVID-19. Funding Chinese National Key Research and Development Program and Beijing Science and Technology Program.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Phase 1/2 trials of CoronaVac in volunteers aged 18-59 years and older than 60 years showed that the vaccine doses and schedules investigated (3 μg or 6 μg, applied 14 days or 28 days apart) all had similar safety and immunogenicity profiles.
“Phase 1/2 trials of CoronaVac in volunteers aged 18–59 years and older than 60 years showed that the vaccine doses and schedules investigated (3 μg or 6 μg, applied 14 days or 28 days apart) all had similar safety and immunogenicity profiles.20, 21”
From Efficacy and safety of an inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac): interim results of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial in Turkey (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
An mRNA Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 — Preliminary Report
Jackson, L. A., Anderson, E. J., Rouphael, N. G., Roberts, P. C., Makhene, M., Coler, R. N., McCullough, M. P., Chappell, J. D., Denison, M. R., Stevens, L. J., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2022483 · Cited by 3,237 · see citing works
Development of an inactivated vaccine candidate for SARS-CoV-2
Gao, Q., Bao, L., Mao, H., Wang, L., Xu, K., Yang, M., Li, Y., Zhu, L., Wang, N., Lv, Z., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abc1932 · Cited by 1,434 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- [2]Huang C Wang Y Li X Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China Lancet 395 2020 497 506 31986264 PMC7159299
- [3]Liu Y Mao B Liang S Association between age and clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 Eur Respir J 55 2020 2001112 PMC7173682 32312864
- [4]Shahid Z Kalayanamitra R McClafferty B COVID-19 and older adults: what we know J Am Geriatr Soc 68 2020 926 929 32255507 PMC7262251
- [5]Nikolich-Zugich J Knox KS Rios CT Natt B Fain MJ SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in older adults: what we may expect regarding pathogenesis, immune responses, and outcomes GeroScience 42 2020 505 514 32274617 PMC7145538
- [6]Trzewikoswki de Lima G De Gaspari E Study of the immune response in the elderly: is it necessary to develop a vaccine against Neisseria meningitidis for the aged? J Aging Res 2019 2019 9287121 PMC6724425 31534800
- [7]Maijó M Clements SJ Ivory K Nicoletti C Carding SR Nutrition, diet and immunosenescence Mech Ageing Dev 136–137 2014 116 128 24373813
- [9]Anderson EJ Rouphael NG Widge AT Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine in older adults N Engl J Med 383 2020 2427 2438 32991794 PMC7556339
- [10]Walsh EE Frenck RW Jr Falsey AR Safety and immunogenicity of two RNA-based COVID-19 vaccine candidates N Engl J Med 383 2020 2439 2450 33053279 PMC7583697
- [11]Zhu F-C Guan X-H Li Y-H Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5-vectored COVID-19 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18 years or older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial Lancet 396 2020 479 488 32702299 PMC7836858
- [12]Ramasamy MN Minassian AM Ewer KJ Safety and immunogenicity of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine administered in a prime–boost regimen in young and old adults (COV002): a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial Lancet 396 2020 1979 1993 33220855 PMC7674972
- [13]Xia S Zhang Y Wang Y Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial Lancet Infect Dis 21 2021 39 51 33069281 PMC7561304
- [14]Widge AT Rouphael NG Jackson LA Durability of responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccination N Engl J Med 2020 published online Dec 3. 10.1056/nejmc2032195 PMC7727324 33270381 · DOI · Paper page
- [16]AstraZeneca AZD1222 vaccine met primary efficacy endpoint in preventing COVID-19 https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2020/azd1222hlr.html 2020
- [18]Che Y Liu X Pu Y Randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled phase II trial of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults Clin Infect Dis 2020 published online Nov 9. 10.1093/cid/ciaa1703 PMC7717222 33165503 · DOI
- [19]Xia S Duan K Zhang Y Effect of an inactivated vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 on safety and immunogenicity outcomes: interim analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials JAMA 324 2020 951 960 32789505 PMC7426884
- [20]Zhang Y Zeng G Pan H Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18–59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial Lancet Infect Dis 2020 published online Nov 17. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30843-4 PMC7832443 33217362 · DOI · Paper page
- [23]Kavanagh K Robertson C McMenamin J Estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in primary care in Scotland vary with clinical or laboratory endpoint and method—experience across the 2010/11 season Vaccine 31 2013 4556 4563 23933371
- [24]Bizjak M Bruck O Praprotnik S Dahan S Shoenfeld Y Pancreatitis after human papillomavirus vaccination: a matter of molecular mimicry Immunol Res 65 2017 164 167 27421720
- [25]Shlomovitz E Davies W Cairns E Brintnell WC Goldszmidt M Dresser GK Severe necrotizing pancreatitis following combined hepatitis A and B vaccination CMAJ 176 2007 339 342 17261831 PMC1780095
- [26]Yu J Tostanoski LH Peter L Mercado NB Barouch DH DNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques Science 369 2020 806 811 32434945 PMC7243363
- [27]Sauer K Harris T An effective COVID-19 vaccine needs to engage T cells Front Immunol 11 2020 581807 PMC7549399 33117391
- [28]Folegatti PM Ewer KJ Aley PK Safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a preliminary report of a phase 1/2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial Lancet 396 2020 467 478 32702298 PMC7445431
- [30]Nothdurft HD Dietrich M Zuckerman JN A new accelerated vaccination schedule for rapid protection against hepatitis A and B Vaccine 20 2002 1157 1162 11803077
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tanriover, M. D., Doğanay, H. L., Akova, M., Güner, H. R., Azap, A., Akhan, S., Köse, Ş., Erdinç, F. Ş., Akalın, E. H., Tabak, Ö. F., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01429-x · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Immunological mechanisms of vaccine-induced protection against COVID-19 in humans
Sadarangani, M., Marchant, A., & Kollmann, T. R. (2021) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-021-00578-z · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Tong, R., Luo, L., Zhao, Y., Sun, M., Li, R., Zhong, J., Chen, Y., Hu, L., Li, Z., Shi, J., et al. (2023) · Emerging Microbes & Infections · doi:10.1080/22221751.2023.2187245 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wu, Z., Hu, Y., Xu, M., Chen, Z., Yang, W., Jiang, Z., Li, M., Jin, H., Cui, G., Chen, P., Wang, L., Zhao, G., Ding, Y., Zhao, Y., & Yin, W.
- Affiliations
- Hebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
- Sinovac Biotech (CN)
- National Institutes for Food and Drug Control (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Yuliang
- Yin, Weidong
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 803-812
- ISSN
- 1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7906628
- OpenAlex
- W3128702325
- Cited by
- 541
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 184 · 2021: 179
- FWCI
- 40.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFC0849600)
- Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project (Z201100005420023)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
- Keywords
- CoronaVac, inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, COVID-19 vaccines, older adults, vaccine safety, vaccine tolerability, immunogenicity, seroconversion, neutralizing antibodies, dose escalation, aluminum hydroxide adjuvant, adverse effects, vaccine dosing, vaccine prioritization, vaccine hesitancy
- MeSH terms
- Seroconversion, Immunogenicity, Vaccine, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Aged, Antibodies, Viral, Antibody Formation, China, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Vaccination, Vaccines, Inactivated, Antibodies, Neutralizing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review