Cited by 262Reproductive tract infections researchHIV, TB, and STIs EpidemiologyHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Global burden and trends of sexually transmitted infections from 1990 to 2019: an observational trend study

Zheng, Yang, Yu, Qi, Lin, Yushi, Zhou, Yuqing, Lan, Lei, Yang, Shigui, Wu, Jie·2022·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a major public health issue worldwide, but there is a paucity of literature on their burden and trends globally. We aimed to assess the global disease burden and trends of STIs from 1990 to 2019. Methods In this observational trend study, we collected data on incident cases, age-standardised incidence rate, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and calculated age-standardised DALY rates, for five STIs (syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomonas, and genital herpes) between 1990 and 2019, by sex, geographical region, and cause using data exclusively from the Global Burden of Disease study 2019. The estimated annual percentage changes in the age-standardised incidence rate and age-standardised DALY rate were calculated to quantify the changing trend. Findings Globally, the age-standardised incidence rate of STIs showed a decreasing trend with an estimated annual percentage change of -0·04 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] -0·08 to 0·00) from 1990 to 2019, reaching 9535·71 per 100 000 person-years (8169·73 to 11 054·76) in 2019. The age-standardised DALY rate showed a decreasing trend with an estimated annual percentage change of -0·92 (-1·01 to -0·84) and reached 22·74 per 100 000 person-years (14·37 to 37·11) in 2019. The sub-Saharan African region had the highest age-standardised incidence rate (19 973·12 per 100 000 person-years, 17 382·69 to 23 001·57) and age-standardised DALY rate (389·32 per 100 000 person-years,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00448-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, Y., Yu, Q., Lin, Y., Zhou, Y., Lan, L., Yang, S., & Wu, J.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wu, Jie
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
541-551
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200393569
Cited by
262
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 29
FWCI
26.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
  • National Major Science and Technology Projects of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › HIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Keywords
sexually transmitted infections, disease burden, incidence trends, disability-adjusted life years, syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea, trichomoniasis, genital herpes, sub-Saharan Africa, adolescents, sex differences, Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, health policy implications, HIV prevention, health care financing
MeSH terms
Global Burden of Disease, Disability-Adjusted Life Years, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Syphilis, Global Health, Incidence, Quality-Adjusted Life Years

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review