Cited by 298Reproductive tract infections researchAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthCervical Cancer and HPV Research

The growing epidemic of sexually transmitted infections in adolescents: a neglected population

Open access
Shannon, Chelsea L., Klausner, Jeffrey D.·2018·Current Opinion in Pediatrics

Abstract

Purpose of review: Sexually transmitted infection (STI) incidence is on the rise in the United States. The increase is especially pronounced in adolescents (15–24 years of age). Despite making up only a quarter of the population, adolescents account for approximately half of new STIs in the United States every year. This review summarizes recent developments in the field of STIs, excluding HIV, in adolescents. Recent findings: In this review, we examine the epidemiology, screening, management, and prevention of STIs in adolescents. STI rates in adolescents have been rising since 2014, with young women and MSM at particularly high risk. Barriers to STI screening for adolescents include confidentiality concerns and lack of access to health services. Prevention through STI vaccines represents a promising way to combat the epidemic. Summary: STIs are a growing concern for adolescents. Routine screening and management are of critical importance. Furthermore, prevention efforts such as human papillomavirus vaccination should be prioritized. Much of the current literature on STIs does not address the unique nature of STIs in adolescents, and additional research into effective prevention and treatment strategies of STIs in adolescents is urgently needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mop.0000000000000578

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shannon, C. L., & Klausner, J. D.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Klausner, Jeffrey D.
Venue
Current Opinion in Pediatrics
Published
2018-02
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
137-143
ISSN
  • 1040-8703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-698X
OpenAlex
W2923225916
Cited by
298
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI028697)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U19HD089886)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
sexually transmitted infections, adolescents, STI incidence, STI screening, STD prevention, HPV vaccination, men who have sex with men, young women, confidentiality, health care access, STI management
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Humans, Mass Screening, Risk Factors, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review