Cited by 41SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesImmune responses and vaccinations

Immune responses after omicron infection in triple-vaccinated health-care workers with and without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection

Open access
Blom, Kim, Marking, Ulrika, Havervall, Sebastian, Norin, Nina Greilert, Gordon, Max, García, Marina, Tecleab, Teghesti, Christ, Wanda +8 more·2022·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00362-0

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of imprinting have already been observed, where individuals primed by spike-based vaccines have a more spike-focused immune response, compared to individuals primed by pre-Omicron infections (in which case, priming also includes non-spike proteins).

    “The effects of imprinting have already been observed, where, for instance, individuals primed by spike-based vaccines have a more spike-focused immune response, compared to individuals primed by pre-Omicron infections (in which case, priming also includes non-spike proteins) 30,31 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]5. Marking U Havervall S Norin NG High rate of BA.1, BA.1.1 and BA.2 infection in triple vaccinated medRxiv 2022 published online April 3. 10.1101/2022.04.02.22273333 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blom, K., Marking, U., Havervall, S., Norin, N. G., Gordon, M., García, M., Tecleab, T., Christ, W., Forsell, M., Phillipson, M., Nilsson, P., Mangsbo, S., Hober, S., Åberg, M., Klingström, J., & Thålin, C.
Affiliations
  • Public Health Agency of Sweden (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Science for Life Laboratory (SE)
  • Danderyds sjukhus (SE)
Corresponding author
Thålin, Charlotte
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
943-945
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281889525
Cited by
41
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
Keywords
Omicron variant, healthcare workers, breakthrough infection, neutralizing antibodies, T cell response, prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, immune response
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Health Personnel, Humans, Immunity, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review