Cited by 594Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPolyomavirus and related diseasesPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

Clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis, part I: natural history, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and prognosis

Open access
Miller, David, Barkhof, Frederik, Montalban, Xavier, Thompson, Alan, Filippi, Massimo·2005·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

In 85% of young adults with multiple sclerosis (MS), onset is a subacute clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) of the optic nerves, brainstem, or spinal cord. Methods of assessing the prognosis for patients who present with a CIS have been sought, because only 30-70% of patients with a CIS develop MS. When clinically silent brain lesions are seen on MRI, the likelihood of developing MS is high. MS can be diagnosed within 3 months of CIS presentation with certain MRI and CSF criteria. Disability from MS is less likely in patients with a CIS of optic neuritis or sensory symptoms only, few or no MRI lesions, a long period to the first relapse, and no disability after the first 5 years. Development of more reliable prognostic markers will enable new treatments to be targeted for those who are most likely to benefit. We encourage continued clinical and laboratory assessment of patients with a CIS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(05)70071-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, D., Barkhof, F., Montalban, X., Thompson, A., & Filippi, M.
Affiliations
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
Corresponding author
Miller, David
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
281-288
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171753008
Cited by
594
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 47
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Multiple Sclerosis Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
clinically isolated syndrome, multiple sclerosis, optic neuritis, prognosis, natural history (disease), pathogenesis, brain MRI lesions, cerebrospinal fluid, disability outcome, relapse, prognostic factors, conversion to multiple sclerosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multiple Sclerosis, Optic Neuritis, Prognosis, Recurrence, Syndrome, Biomarkers, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review