Cited by 181Restless Legs Syndrome ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatments

Less is more: pathophysiology of dopaminergic-therapy-related augmentation in restless legs syndrome

Paulus, Walter, Trenkwalder, Claudia·2006·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Therapy-related augmentation of the symptoms of restless legs syndrome (RLS) is an important clinical problem reported in up to 60% of patients treated with levodopa and, to a lesser extent, with dopamine agonists. The efficacy of low-dose dopaminergic drugs for RLS has been established, but the mode of action is unknown. Here, we review the existing data and conclude that augmentation is a syndrome characterised by a severely increased dopamine concentration in the CNS; overstimulation of the dopamine D1 receptors compared with D2 receptors in the spinal cord may lead to D1-related pain and generate periodic limb movements; iron deficiency may be a main predisposing factor of augmentation, probably caused by a reduced function of the dopamine transporter; therapy with levodopa or dopamine agonists should remain at low doses and; iron supplementation and opiates are the therapy of choice to counter augmentation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70576-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dopaminergic substances have good short-term efficacy in RLS, but complete remission does not occur in all patients, and long-term treatment may be complicated by loss of efficacy and augmentation.

    “In clinical trials, dopaminergic substances showed good efficacy in the short-term treatment of RLS, although complete remission of symptoms does not occur in all patients, 3 and long-term treatment with dopaminergic drugs may be complicated by loss of efficacy and augmentation.4”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paulus, W., & Trenkwalder, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Paracelsus Elena Klinik Kassel (DE)
Corresponding author
Paulus, Walter
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
5
Issue
10
Pages
878-886
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100272666
Cited by
181
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Restless Legs Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
restless legs syndrome, augmentation, levodopa, dopamine agonists, dopaminergic therapy, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, spinal cord, periodic limb movements, iron deficiency, dopamine transporter, iron supplementation, opiates
MeSH terms
Circadian Rhythm, Dopamine, Humans, Iron, Levodopa, Restless Legs Syndrome, Dopamine Agents, Receptors, Dopamine D2, Dopamine Agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review