Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 608

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Miglustat for treatment of Niemann-Pick C disease: a randomised controlled study

Open access
Patterson, Marc C, Vecchio, Darleen, Prady, Helena, Abel, Larry, Wraith, James E·2007·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND Niemann-Pick type C disease (NPC) is an inherited neurodegenerative disorder characterised by an intracellular lipid-trafficking defect with secondary accumulation of glycosphingolipids. Miglustat, a small iminosugar, reversibly inhibits glucosylceramide synthase, which catalyses the first committed step of glycosphingolipid synthesis. Miglustat is able to cross the blood-brain barrier, and is thus a potential therapy for neurological diseases. We aimed to establish the effect of miglustat on several markers of NPC severity. METHODS Patients aged 12 years or older who had NPC (n=29) were randomly assigned to receive either miglustat 200 mg three times a day (n=20) or standard care (n=9) for 12 months. 12 children younger than 12 years of age were included in an additional cohort; all received miglustat at a dose adjusted for body surface area. All participants were then treated with miglustat for an additional year in an extension study. The primary endpoint was horizontal saccadic eye movement (HSEM) velocity, based on its correlation with disease progression. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN26761144. FINDINGS At 12 months, HSEM velocity had improved in patients treated with miglustat versus those receiving standard care; results were significant when patients taking benzodiazepines were excluded (p=0.028). Children showed an improvement in HSEM velocity of similar size at 12 months. Improvement in swallowing capacity, stable auditory acuity, and a slower deterioration in ambulatory index were also seen in treated patients older than 12 years. The safety and tolerability of miglustat 200 mg three times a day in study participants was consistent with previous trials in type I Gaucher disease, where half this dose was used. INTERPRETATION Miglustat improves or stabilises several clinically relevant markers of NPC. This is the first agent studied in NPC for which there is both animal and clinical data supporting a disease modifying benefit.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70194-1

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 608

Metadata

Authors
Patterson, M. C., Vecchio, D., Prady, H., Abel, L., & Wraith, J. E.
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
765-772
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155503300
Cited by
608
References
34
FWCI
20.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Miglustat for treatment of Niemann-Pick C disease: a randomised controlled study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70194-1
The paper
Patterson, M. C., Vecchio, D., Prady, H., Abel, L., & Wraith, J. E. (2007). Miglustat for treatment of Niemann-Pick C disease: a randomised controlled study. The Lancet Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70194-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.