Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 784

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study

Open access
Lansberg, Maarten G, Straka, Matus, Kemp, Stephanie, Mlynash, Michael, Wechsler, Lawrence R, Jovin, Tudor G, Wilder, Michael J, Lutsep, Helmi L, Czartoski, Todd J, Bernstein, Richard A, Chang, Cherylee WJ, Warach, Steven, Fazekas, Franz, Inoue, Manabu, Tipirneni, Aaryani, Hamilton, Scott A, Zaharchuk, Greg, Marks, Michael P, Bammer, Roland, Albers, Gregory W·2012·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Background It is uncertain if endovascular stroke therapy leads to improved clinical outcomes due to a paucity of data from randomized placebo-controlled trials. The aim of this study was to determine if MRI can be used to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from endovascular reperfusion. Methods Consecutive patients, scheduled to undergo endovascular therapy within 12 hours of stroke onset, were enrolled in a multi-center prospective cohort study. Aided by an automated image analysis software program, investigators interpreted the baseline MRI. They determined, prior to endovascular treatment, if the patient had an MRI profile (Target Mismatch) that suggested salvageable tissue was present. Reperfusion was assessed on an early follow-up MRI and defined as a >50% reduction in the volume of the baseline perfusion lesion. A favorable clinical response was defined as a ≥8 point improvement on the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) between baseline and day 30 or an NIHSS score of 0–1 at 30 days. Findings Following endovascular therapy reperfusion occurred in 46 of 78 (59%) Target Mismatch patients and in 12 of 21 (57%) No Target Mismatch patients. The adjusted odds ratio for favorable clinical response associated with reperfusion was 8·5 (95% CI 2·6 – 28) in the Target Mismatch group and 0·2 (95% CI 0·0 – 1·6) in the No Target Mismatch group (p=0·003 for difference between odds ratios). Reperfusion was associated with an increased odds of good functional outcome at 90 days (OR is 5.2, 95% CI 1.4–19) and attenuation of infarct growth at 5 days (30 ml of median growth with reperfusion vs. 73 ml without reperfusion, p=0·01) in the Target Mismatch group but not in patients without Target Mismatch. Interpretation Target Mismatch patients who achieved early reperfusion following endovascular stroke therapy had more favorable clinical outcomes and less infarct growth. No association between reperfusion and favorable outcomes was present in patients without Target Mismatch. These data support a randomized controlled trial of endovascular treatment in patients with the Target Mismatch profile.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70203-x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 784

Metadata

Authors
Lansberg, M. G., Straka, M., Kemp, S., Mlynash, M., Wechsler, L. R., Jovin, T. G., Wilder, M. J., Lutsep, H. L., Czartoski, T. J., Bernstein, R. A., Chang, C. W., Warach, S., Fazekas, F., Inoue, M., Tipirneni, A., Hamilton, S. A., Zaharchuk, G., Marks, M. P., Bammer, R., & Albers, G. W.
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
860-867
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990814258
Cited by
784
References
25
FWCI
58.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70203-x
The paper
Lansberg, M. G., Straka, M., Kemp, S., Mlynash, M., Wechsler, L. R., Jovin, T. G., Wilder, M. J., Lutsep, H. L., Czartoski, T. J., Bernstein, R. A., Chang, C. W., Warach, S., Fazekas, F., Inoue, M., Tipirneni, A., Hamilton, S. A., Zaharchuk, G., Marks, M. P., Bammer, R., & Albers, G. W. (2012). MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. The Lancet Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70203-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.