Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biomarkers and diagnostic guidelines for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

Open access
Hermann, Peter, Appleby, Brian, Brandel, Jean-Philippe, Caughey, Byron, Collins, Steven, Geschwind, Michael D, Green, Alison, Haïk, Stephane, Kovacs, Gabor G, Ladogana, Anna, Llorens, Franc, Mead, Simon, Nishida, Noriyuki, Pal, Suvankar, Parchi, Piero, Pocchiari, Maurizio, Satoh, Katsuya, Zanusso, Gianluigi, Zerr, Inga·2021·The Lancet Neurology

Abstract

Summary Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) is a fatal and potentially transmissible neurodegenerative disease caused by misfolded prion proteins (PrPSc). To date, effective therapeutics are not available and accurate diagnosis can be challenging. Clinical diagnostic criteria employ a combination of characteristic neuropsychiatric symptoms, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteins 14–3-3, MRI, and EEG. Supportive biomarkers such as high CSF total Tau may aid the diagnostic process. Discordant results of studies however, have led to controversies about the clinical value of some established surrogate biomarkers. The recent development and clinical application of disease-specific protein aggregation and amplification assays such as Real-time Quaking Induced Conversion (RT-QuIC) have constituted major breakthroughs for the confident pre-mortem diagnosis of sCJD. Updated criteria for the diagnosis of sCJD including RT-QuIC will improve early clinical confirmation, surveillance, assessment of PrPSc seeding activity in different tissues, and trial monitoring. Moreover, emerging blood-based, prognostic, and potentially pre-symptomatic biomarker candidates are under current investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30477-4

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 103 references

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Hermann, P., Appleby, B., Brandel, J.-P., Caughey, B., Collins, S., Geschwind, M. D., Green, A., Haïk, S., Kovacs, G. G., Ladogana, A., Llorens, F., Mead, S., Nishida, N., Pal, S., Parchi, P., Pocchiari, M., Satoh, K., Zanusso, G., & Zerr, I.
Venue
The Lancet Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
235-246
ISSN
1474-4422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3132607516
Cited by
361
References
103
FWCI
16.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomarkers and diagnostic guidelines for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30477-4
The paper
Hermann, P., Appleby, B., Brandel, J.-P., Caughey, B., Collins, S., Geschwind, M. D., Green, A., Haïk, S., Kovacs, G. G., Ladogana, A., Llorens, F., Mead, S., Nishida, N., Pal, S., Parchi, P., Pocchiari, M., Satoh, K., Zanusso, G., & Zerr, I. (2021). Biomarkers and diagnostic guidelines for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. The Lancet Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(20)30477-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.