Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Poorly Differentiated Breast Carcinoma is Associated with Increased Expression of the Human Polycomb Group EZH2 Gene

Open access
Raaphorst, Frank M., Meijer, Chris J.L.M., Fieret, Elly, Blokzijl, Tjasso, Mommers, Ellen, Buerger, Horst, Packeisen, Jens, Sewalt, Richard A.B., Ottet, Arie P., van Diest, Paul J.·2003·Neoplasia

Abstract

Polycomb group (PcG) genes contribute to the maintenance of cell identity, cell cycle regulation, and oncogenesis. We describe the expression of five PcG genes (BMI-1, RING1, HPC1, HPC2, and EZH2) innormal breast tissues, invasive breast carcinomas, and their precursors. Members of the HPC-HPH/PRC1 PcG complex, including BMI-1, RING1, HPC1, and HPC2, were detected in normal resting and cycling breast cells. The EED-EZH/PRC2 PcG complex protein EZH2 was only found in rare cycling cells, whereas normal resting breast cells were negative for EZH2. PcG gene expression patterns in ductal hyperplasia (DH), well-differentiated ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and well-differentiated invasive carcinomas closely resembled the pattern in healthy cells. However, poorly differentiated DCIS and invasive carcinomas frequently expressed EZH2 in combination with HPC-HPH/PRC1 proteins. Most BMI-1/EZH2 double-positive cells in poorly differentiated DCIS were resting. Poorly differentiated invasive carcinoma displayed an enhanced rate of cell division within BMI-1/EZH2 double-positive cells. We propose that the enhanced expression of EZH2 in BMI-1(+) cells contributes to the loss of cell identity in poorly differentiated breast carcinomas, and that increased EZH2 expression precedes high frequencies of proliferation. These observations suggest that deregulated expression of EZH2 is associated with loss of differentiation and development of poorly differentiated breast cancer in humans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1476-5586(03)80032-5

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Raaphorst, F. M., Meijer, C. J. L. M., Fieret, E., Blokzijl, T., Mommers, E., Buerger, H., Packeisen, J., Sewalt, R. A. B., Ottet, A. P., & van Diest, P. J.
Venue
Neoplasia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
481-488
ISSN
1476-5586 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128844255
Cited by
194
References
6
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Poorly Differentiated Breast Carcinoma is Associated with Increased Expression of the Human Polycomb Group EZH2 Gene. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1476-5586(03)80032-5
The paper
Raaphorst, F. M., Meijer, C. J. L. M., Fieret, E., Blokzijl, T., Mommers, E., Buerger, H., Packeisen, J., Sewalt, R. A. B., Ottet, A. P., & van Diest, P. J. (2003). Poorly Differentiated Breast Carcinoma is Associated with Increased Expression of the Human Polycomb Group EZH2 Gene. Neoplasia. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1476-5586(03)80032-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.