Cited by 51HER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Comparison of two quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods for detecting HER2/neu amplification

Open access
Millson, Alison, Suli, Arminda, Hartung, Leah, Kunitake, Steve, Bennett, Ann, Nordberg, Mary C. Lowry, Hanna, Wedad, Wittwer, Carl T. +2 more·2003·The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics

Abstract

Two quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for HER2/neu gene quantification were evaluated for implementation into a clinical laboratory. Assays were developed using sequence-specific hybridization probes to detect a target (HER2/neu) and a reference gene (beta-globin) simultaneously. One method utilizes real-time quantification while the second uses internal competitors and melting curves to quantify the unknown sample. These two methods were evaluated using three cell lines and 97 breast tumor samples. Two hundred ninety-four samples were subsequently evaluated using the real-time quantification and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Real-time PCR gave HER2/neu gene doses of 10 for SKBR3 and 2 for T47D while the competitive PCR gave doses of 11 for SKBR3 and 2.2 for T47D. Both methods produced coefficients of variation (CV) of less than 3% for within-run and less than 6% for between-run analysis. Examination of 97 breast tumors found a correlation of r = 0.974 between the two methods. IHC and PCR results agreed for 234 of the subsequent 294 samples analyzed (79% concordance). A subset of ten discrepant samples was microdissected. After microdissection all ten were positive by PCR, thus resolving the discrepancy. Real-time quantification and microdissection is useful clinically for HER2/neu quantification. Its ease of use and broad dynamic range allows screening for amplification of HER2/neu.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60471-0

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SK-BR-3 gDNA has high levels of HER2 amplification corresponding to the published copy number range of 14-24 copies per diploid genome.

    “Analysis of the SK-BR-3 gDNA identified high levels of HER2 amplification that corresponds with the published copy number range (14–24 copies per diploid genome) (41,43–45,47).”

    From Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation (2012) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Results (p. 4) report high HER2/neu amplification in SKBR3, with a gene dose of 10 relative to the single-copy MRC-5 control; the competitive PCR results (p. 4) give a dose of 11. Our copy does not state the claimed published range of 14–24 copies per diploid genome or explicitly equate its measurements with that range. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • T-47D gDNA gave a HER2:RNase P ratio of <2 (3-4 copies per diploid genome).

    “T-47D gDNA gave a HER2:RNase P ratio of < 2 (3–4 copies per diploid genome) (43–46).”

    From Comparison of microfluidic digital PCR and conventional quantitative PCR for measuring copy number variation (2012) · cites this paper as [45]

    Sample Preparation (p. 2) and Results (p. 4) describe T47D as having approximately four HER2/neu copies, supporting the copy-number portion of the claim. The paper uses β-globin, not RNase P, as its reference gene; Results (p. 4) reports a T47D gene dose of 2, and the β-globin section (p. 4) reports 2.2 by the other method. It therefore does not support a HER2:RNase P ratio below 2. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]12. combination with trastuzumab (Herceptin). Semin Oncol 2000, 27: 19-23
  2. [15]15. Persson K, Pandis N, Mertens F, Borg A, Baldetorp B, Killander D, Isola J: Chromosomal aberrations in breast cancer: a comparison between cytogenetics and comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999, 25:115-122

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Millson, A., Suli, A., Hartung, L., Kunitake, S., Bennett, A., Nordberg, M. C. L., Hanna, W., Wittwer, C. T., Seth, A., & Lyon, E.
Affiliations
  • ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Lyon, Elaine
Venue
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
184-190
ISSN
1525-1578 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086286786
Cited by
51
References
35
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Diagnostics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
HER2 amplification, real-time PCR, competitive PCR, breast cancer, immunohistochemistry, tumor microdissection, assay comparison, SKBR3, T47D cells
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Humans, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA Primers, Genes, erbB-2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review