Cited by 22Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsElectrolyte and hormonal disordersGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Physician misdiagnosis of dehydration in older adults

Thomas, D.R.·2004·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1525-8610(04)70087-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, D. R.
Corresponding author
Thomas, D.R.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
S30
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912783140
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Electrolyte and hormonal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
dehydration, older adults, misdiagnosis, diagnosis, physical examination findings, quality of care, elderly care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review