The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE IMPACT OF LANGUAGE BARRIERS ON THE HEALTH CARE OF LATINOS IN THE UNITED STATES: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND GUIDELINES FOR PRACTICE
Abstract
Although Spanish was the primary language of an estimated 11% of adults in the year 2000, the U.S. health care system is largely geared toward serving English speakers. A systematic review was conducted of studies published in biomedical journals from 1990 to 2000 examining language barriers in health care for Latino populations. Aspects of the problem examined were access to health care, quality of care, and health status/health outcomes. Five (55%) of the nine studies examining access to care found a significant adverse effect of language; three (33%) found mixed or weak evidence that language affected access. Six (86%) of the seven studies evaluating quality of care found a significant detrimental effect of language barriers. Two of the three studies examining health status or outcomes found language to be a risk factor for adverse outcomes. Evidence was mixed as to the level of importance attributable to language when access to care is considered; however, non‐English‐speaking status was a marker of a population at risk for decreased access. Solid evidence showed that language barriers can adversely affect quality of care. Health care practitioners are recommended to devise an effective strategy to bridge language barriers in their setting. National laws and policies are discussed; practical guidelines and resources for providing language access in health care are provided. This article is intended to supply basic knowledge for providers and institutions in devising effective strategies for bridging the language barrier.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use and Effectiveness of Interpreters in an Emergency Department
Baker, D. W. (1996) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530340047028 · Cited by 428
Cited by
Shippee, N. D., Shah, N. D., May, C. R., Mair, F. S., & Montori, V. M. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.005 · Cited by 728
Diamond, L., Izquierdo, K., Canfield, D., Matsoukas, K., & Gany, F. (2019) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-019-04847-5 · Cited by 586
Robertshaw, L., Dhesi, S., & Jones, L. L. (2017) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015981 · Cited by 282
Cestari, D. M., Gaier, E. D., Bouzika, P., Blachley, T. S., De Lott, L. B., Rizzo, J. F., Wiggs, J. L., Kang, J. H., Pasquale, L. R., & Stein, J. D. (2016) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.08.017 · Cited by 125
Impact of the Affordable Care Act on health care access and utilization among Latinos.
Alcalá, H. E., Chen, J., Langellier, B. A., Roby, D. H., & Ortega, A. N. (2017) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2017.01.160208 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Timmins, C. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-03-04
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 80-96
- ISSN
- 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-2011
- OpenAlex
- W2030709365
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE IMPACT OF LANGUAGE BARRIERS ON THE HEALTH CARE OF LATINOS IN THE UNITED STATES: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND GUIDELINES FOR PRACTICE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1526-9523(02)00218-0
- The paper
- Timmins, C. L. (2002). THE IMPACT OF LANGUAGE BARRIERS ON THE HEALTH CARE OF LATINOS IN THE UNITED STATES: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND GUIDELINES FOR PRACTICE. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1526-9523(02)00218-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.