The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy of Self‐Reported Height and Weight in Women: An Integrative Review of the Literature
Abstract
Height and weight are two of the most commonly used anthropometric measurements in clinical practice and research. Self‐reported height and weight measurement is a simple, efficient, inexpensive, and non‐invasive method of collecting data from large numbers of people. This integrative review of the published research examined the accuracy of self‐reported height and weight measurements in women. Twenty‐six studies examined the accuracy of self‐reported height in 39,244 women. Twenty‐one of the studies found that women overestimate height. Thirty‐four studies reviewed the accuracy of self‐reported weight in 57,172 women, and all 34 studies reported that women underestimated weight. Although mean variations between self‐reported and measured values were small, a significant percentage of women in study groups had very large errors. Inaccurate measurements of both height and weight can cause significant inaccuracies in calculation of body mass index, which is used as a guide for identifying persons at risk for disease. These findings indicate that direct measurement of height and weight should be performed whenever possible for optimal measurements in clinical practice and clinically oriented research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of Age on Validity of Self-Reported Height, Weight, and Body Mass Index
KUCZMARSKI, M. F., KUCZMARSKI, R. J., & NAJJAR, M. (2001) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(01)00008-6 · Cited by 965
Cited by
Gorber, S. C., Tremblay, M., Moher, D., & Gorber, B. (2007) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2007.00347.x · Cited by 1,945
A century of trends in adult human height
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.13410 · Cited by 1,558
Ezzati, M., Martin, H., Skjold, S., Hoorn, S. V., & Murray, C. J. L. (2006) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/014107680609900517 · Cited by 365
Weight Regain in U.S. Adults Who Experienced Substantial Weight Loss, 1999–2002
Weiss, E. C., Galuska, D. A., Kettel Khan, L., Gillespie, C., & Serdula, M. K. (2007) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.02.040 · Cited by 307
Runfola, C. D., Von Holle, A., Trace, S. E., Brownley, K. A., Hofmeier, S. M., Gagne, D. A., & Bulik, C. M. (2013) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.2201 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Engstrom, J. L., Paterson, S. A., Doherty, A., Trabulsi, M., & Speer, K. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09-10
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 338-345
- ISSN
- 1526-9523 (ISSN-L)
- 1542-2011
- OpenAlex
- W2005990352
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of Self‐Reported Height and Weight in Women: An Integrative Review of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1526-9523(03)00281-2
- The paper
- Engstrom, J. L., Paterson, S. A., Doherty, A., Trabulsi, M., & Speer, K. L. (2003). Accuracy of Self‐Reported Height and Weight in Women: An Integrative Review of the Literature. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1526-9523(03)00281-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.