The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters.
Fleiss, J. L. (1971) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0031619 · Cited by 8,733
High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes
Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-l · Cited by 3,034
Byrt, T., Bishop, J., & Carlin, J. B. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-v · Cited by 2,179 · cited 7×
“Despite kappa’s popularity, several authors have commented on its apparent shortcomings [12,14,22, 23,31].”
BackgroundInfluentialHigh agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes
Cicchetti, D. V., & Feinstein, A. R. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90159-m · Cited by 1,838
Misinterpretation and misuse of the kappa statistic
MACLURE, M., & WILLETT, W. C. (1987) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/126.2.161 · Cited by 808
Cited by
Brown, J. M., Campbell, J. P., Beers, A., Chang, K., Ostmo, S., Chan, R. V. P., Dy, J., Erdogmus, D., Ioannidis, S., Kalpathy-Cramer, J., et al. (2018) · JAMA Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1934 · Cited by 657
Hebert, R. S., Schulz, R., Copeland, V. C., & Arnold, R. M. (2009) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.12.010 · Cited by 255
South, B. R., Shen, S., Jones, M., Garvin, J., Samore, M. H., Chapman, W. W., & Gundlapalli, A. V. (2009) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-s9-s12 · Cited by 51
Cheong, K. B., Leung, K. Y., Li, T. K. T., Chan, H. Y., Lee, Y. P., & Tang, M. H. Y. (2010) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.7609 · Cited by 45
Artificial intelligence-based conversational agent to support medication prescribing
Preininger, A. M., South, B., Heiland, J., Buchold, A., Baca, M., Wang, S., Nipper, R., Kutub, N., Bohanan, B., & Jackson, G. P. (2020) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa009 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Hripcsak, G., & Heitjan, D. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 99-110
- ISSN
- 1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040447587
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1532-0464(02)00500-2
- The paper
- Hripcsak, G., & Heitjan, D. F. (2002). Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1532-0464(02)00500-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
