Cited by 45Ultrasound in Clinical ApplicationsPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Comparison of inter‐ and intraobserver agreement and reliability between three different types of placental volume measurement technique (XI VOCAL™, VOCAL™ and multiplanar) and validity in the in‐vitro setting

Cheong, K. B., Leung, K. Y., Li, T. K. T., Chan, H. Y., Lee, Y. P., Tang, M. H. Y.·2010·Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare XI VOCAL (eXtended Imaging Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis) for three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound volumetry of the placenta and of phantom objects with a rotational method using VOCAL and with the multiplanar method. METHODS: We acquired 3D volume datasets from 32 fetuses at 11-14 weeks' gestation. Placental volume was calculated twice by each of two observers using XI VOCAL (with 5, 10, 15 and 20 slices), multiplanar (1-mm interval) and VOCAL (with 12 degrees, 18 degrees and 30 degrees rotation) methods. In addition, validity was assessed using the in-vitro setting with three phantom objects of known volume. RESULTS: Both inter- and intraobserver reliabilities were very high for all three methods. There was no systematic bias between any two methods except between XI VOCAL (10 slices) and the multiplanar (1-mm interval) method, with a smaller volume using the former method. The limits of agreement were wide between any two of the three methods. In the in-vitro setting, there was a trend towards less valid measurements with the XI VOCAL technique and fewer slices. With the same number of steps, measurements made with VOCAL (12 degrees and 18 degrees) were more valid than were those made with XI VOCAL (15 and 10 slices, respectively). CONCLUSION: XI VOCAL cannot be used interchangeably with VOCAL or multiplanar techniques in measuring placental volume at 11-14 weeks' gestation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/uog.7609

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is uncertainty regarding the repeatability and reproducibility of volume results produced using VOCALTM, with certain iterations producing less reliable results.

    “There is also some uncertainty regarding the repeatability and reproducibility of volume results produced using this method, with certain iterations of the VOCAL™ software producing less reliable results [36].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheong, K. B., Leung, K. Y., Li, T. K. T., Chan, H. Y., Lee, Y. P., & Tang, M. H. Y.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
  • Tsan Yuk Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Leung, K. Y.
Venue
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07-28
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
210-217
ISSN
  • 0960-7692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-0705
OpenAlex
W2007900078
Cited by
45
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
placental volume, VOCAL, multiplanar reconstruction, interobserver agreement, intra-rater reliability, phantom validation, early pregnancy
MeSH terms
Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Placenta, Pregnancy, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Phantoms, Imaging, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Fetal Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review