Molecular classification of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas using patterns of gene expression
Open accessAbstract
The prognostication of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is largely based upon the tumor size and location and the presence of lymph node metastases. Here we show that gene expression patterns from 60 HNSCC samples assayed on cDNA microarrays allowed categorization of these tumors into four distinct subtypes. These subtypes showed statistically significant differences in recurrence-free survival and included a subtype with a possible EGFR-pathway signature, a mesenchymal-enriched subtype, a normal epithelium-like subtype, and a subtype with high levels of antioxidant enzymes. Supervised analyses to predict lymph node metastasis status were approximately 80% accurate when tumor subsite and pathological node status were considered simultaneously. This work represents an important step toward the identification of clinically significant biomarkers for HNSCC.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a significant association between anaphase chromosome missegregation and the incidence of lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
“histologic analysis of primary tumors from patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma11 revealed a significant association between anaphase chromosome missegregation and the incidence of lymph node metastasis”
From Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response (2018) · cites this paper as [11]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 50 · Cited by 678
- Authors
- Chung, C. H., Parker, J. S., Karaca, G., Wu, J., Funkhouser, W. K., Moore, D., Butterfoss, D., Xiang, D., Zanation, A., Yin, X., Shockley, W. W., Weissler, M. C., Dressler, L. G., Shores, C. G., Yarbrough, W. G., & Perou, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Perou, Charles M
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 489-500
- ISSN
- 1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986311875
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 32.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cancer Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- American College of Surgeons
- U.S. Public Health Service (P3916086-25)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (P50-CA58223-09A1)
- National Cancer Institute (P50‐CA58223‐09A1, CA-58223, P50 CA 58223, P50CA058223)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Keywords
- head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, molecular classification, gene expression patterns, tumor subtypes, mesenchymal subtype, antioxidant enzymes, lymph node metastasis prediction, recurrence-free survival, prognostic factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Lymphatic Metastasis, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Survival Rate, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review