Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response
Open accessAbstract
Chromosomal instability is a hallmark of cancer that results from ongoing errors in chromosome segregation during mitosis. Although chromosomal instability is a major driver of tumour evolution, its role in metastasis has not been established. Here we show that chromosomal instability promotes metastasis by sustaining a tumour cell-autonomous response to cytosolic DNA. Errors in chromosome segregation create a preponderance of micronuclei whose rupture spills genomic DNA into the cytosol. This leads to the activation of the cGAS-STING (cyclic GMP-AMP synthase-stimulator of interferon genes) cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway and downstream noncanonical NF-κB signalling. Genetic suppression of chromosomal instability markedly delays metastasis even in highly aneuploid tumour models, whereas continuous chromosome segregation errors promote cellular invasion and metastasis in a STING-dependent manner. By subverting lethal epithelial responses to cytosolic DNA, chromosomally unstable tumour cells co-opt chronic activation of innate immune pathways to spread to distant organs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
24 of 29 cited sources checked · 10 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Chromosomally unstable cells exhibit evidence of chromosome missegregation during anaphase.
“Chromosomally unstable cells exhibit evidence of chromosome missegregation during anaphase3,4”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [3] Thompson, S. L. & Compton, D. A. Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 180, 665–672 (2008) source
- cites [4] Cimini, D. et al. Merotelic kinetochore orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy in mitotic mammalian tissue cells. J. Cell Biol. 153, 517–527 (2001) source
The Results section reports lagging chromosomes and occasional sister-chromatid missegregation during anaphase in PtK1 cells. It does not establish that the cells studied were chromosomally unstable, so the claim’s population qualifier is not supported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Overexpression of Kif2a had no effect on CIN despite exhibiting microtubule-depolymerizing activity on interphase microtubules.
“we overexpressed Kif2a, a third member of the kinesin-13 proteins that lacks kinetochore and centromere localization domains13, and observed no effect on CIN despite exhibiting microtubule-depolymerizing activity on interphase microtubules”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Ems-McClung, S. C. & Walczak, C. E. Kinesin-13s in mitosis: key players in the spatial and temporal organization of spindle microtubules. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 276–282 (2010) source
The citation is attached to the description of Kif2A, not to the citing authors’ own overexpression and CIN results. Section 3.1 identifies Kif2A as a kinesin-13 found mainly at spindle poles, but also reports its association with centromeres; the copy does not establish that it lacks kinetochore and centromere localization domains. The cited review does not report the stated overexpression experiment. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Overexpression of Kif2b or MCAK directly suppresses CIN in otherwise chromosomally unstable cells.
“Destabilization of microtubule attachments to chromosomes at the kinetochores, through overexpression of the non-motile microtubule depolymerizing kinesin-13 proteins, Kif2b or MCAK/Kif2c, directly suppresses CIN in otherwise chromosomally unstable cells5–7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [5] Bakhoum, S. F. et al. The mitotic origin of chromosomal instability. Curr. Biol. 24, R148–R149 (2014) source
In the main text (page unavailable), GFP–Kif2b overexpression reduced karyotypic heterogeneity in two CIN+ cell lines, supporting suppression of CIN. The paper also reports earlier results for kinesin-13 overexpression in two other CIN+ lines, but our copy does not identify MCAK/Kif2c or establish its effect separately. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [6] Bakhoum, S. F. et al. Numerical chromosomal instability mediates susceptibility to radiation treatment. Nat. Commun. 6, 5990 (2015) source
- cites [7] Bakhoum, S. F., Thompson, S. L., Manning, A. L. & Compton, D. A. Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore–microtubule dynamics. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 27–35 (2009) source
- Findingcitation
Overexpression of a dominant negative MCAK mutant led to a modest increase in chromosome missegregation in MDA-MB-231 cells.
“whereas overexpression of a dominant negative MCAK mutant12 (dnMCAK) led to a modest increase in chromosome missegregation in MDA-MB-231 cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Moore, A. T. et al. MCAK associates with the tips of polymerizing microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 169, 391–397 (2005) source
- Premisecitation
Cells overexpressing Kif2b or MCAK continue to propagate abnormal aneuploid karyotypes in a stable manner.
“Cells overexpressing Kif2b or MCAK continue to propagate abnormal aneuploid karyotypes albeit in a stable manner7.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Bakhoum, S. F., Thompson, S. L., Manning, A. L. & Compton, D. A. Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore–microtubule dynamics. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 27–35 (2009) source
- Premisecitation
CIN correlates with tumor metastasis.
“Chromosomal instability (CIN) correlates with tumor metastasis1,2”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Jamal-Hanjani, M. et al. Tracking the evolution of non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 2109–2121 (2017) source
The Results passage (page not available in our copy) links a high proportion of subclonal copy-number alterations to a higher risk of recurrence or death in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. The Discussion describes copy-number heterogeneity in relation to chromosomal instability, but neither passage establishes a correlation with metastasis specifically. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [2] Turajlic, S. & Swanton, C. Metastasis as an evolutionary process. Science 352, 169–175 (2016) source
- Findingcitation
cGAS localizes to approximately half of all micronuclei.
“We found a striking localization of cGAS to approximately half of all micronuclei as previously observed22,23.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [22] Harding, S. M. et al. Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei. Nature 548, 466–470 (2017) source
The section labeled Abstract (page not provided) reports that cGAS localizes to micronuclei, and Extended Data Figure 4 describes measuring cGAS-positive micronuclei. However, the passages do not report that approximately half of all micronuclei are cGAS-positive. The reported majority concerns micronucleated daughter cells in a live-imaging experiment, not all micronuclei. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [23] Mackenzie, K. J. et al. cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity. Nature 548, 461–465 (2017) source
The paper reports that cGAS localizes to micronuclei, but its quantified result is 83.3 ± 1.4% GFP-cGAS-positive micronuclei in RNase H2-deficient mouse fibroblasts (Abstract, Fig. 1d), not approximately half. It also describes localization in other settings without establishing a proportion for all micronuclei. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Impeding micronuclear rupture through Lamin B2 overexpression significantly diminished the relative fraction of cGAS+ micronuclei.
“Impeding micronuclear rupture through Lamin B2 overexpression20 significantly diminished the relative fraction of cGAS+ micronuclei (Fig. 6a–b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Hatch, E. M., Fischer, A. H., Deerinck, T. J. & Hetzer, M. W. Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei. Cell 154, 47–60 (2013) source
- Findingcitation
The top 23 differentially expressed genes in CIN-high cells (CIN signature) predicted distant-metastasis-free survival in a meta-analysis and a validation cohort of patients with breast cancer, irrespective of tumor subtype, grade, or lymph node status.
“The top 23 differentially expressed genes in CIN-high cells (referred to as CIN signature) predicted distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in a meta-analysis16 as well as a validation cohort17 of patients with breast cancer, irrespective of tumor subtype, grade, or lymph node status”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [16] Györffy, B. et al. An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1,809 patients. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 123, 725–731 (2010) source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [17] Hatzis, C. et al. A genomic predictor of response and survival following taxane–anthracycline chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 305, 1873–1881 (2011) source
The Methods describe predictors using 33 and 27 probe sets for early relapse, not a 23-gene CIN signature. The Results report distant-relapse-free survival in an independent validation cohort, but our copy does not say that the CIN signature was tested there or that it predicted survival irrespective of subtype, grade, or lymph-node status. Searches for the CIN signature and those validation claims found no supporting passage; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
These two mutually exclusive states likely account for the reversibility in chromosome missegregation rates seen in primary tumors and metastases.
“These two mutually exclusive states, which were recently observed in a pan-cancer genomic analysis of metastatic tumors41, likely account for the reversibility in chromosome missegregation rates seen in primary tumors and metastases”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Robinson, D. R. et al. Integrative clinical genomics of metastatic cancer. Nature 548, 297–303 (2017) source
- Premisecitation
The emergence, and subsequent tolerance, of CIN represents an important bottleneck during tumor evolution.
“The emergence, and subsequent tolerance, of CIN represents an important bottleneck during tumor evolution38–40.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [38] Sheltzer, J. M. et al. Single-chromosome gains commonly function as tumor suppressors. Cancer Cell 31, 240–255 (2017) source
The Results (no page supplied) show that chromosome gains and transiently induced karyotypic abnormalities impair proliferation and transformation, consistent with a barrier to tumor development. But the authors explicitly avoided continuous CIN in those experiments; the paper does not establish that the emergence and subsequent tolerance of CIN itself is a bottleneck during tumor evolution. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [39] Weaver, B. A. A., Silk, A. D., Montagna, C., Verdier-Pinard, P. & Cleveland, D. W. Aneuploidy acts both oncogenically and as a tumor suppressor. Cancer Cell 11, 25–36 (2007) source
- cites [40] Rowald, K. et al. Negative selection and chromosome instability induced by Mad2 overexpression delay breast cancer but facilitate oncogene-independent outgrowth. Cell Reports 15, 2679–2691 (2016) source
- Interpretationreasoning
CIN drives the subset of human metastases characterized by EMT and inflammation.
“It also leads us to suggest that CIN drives the subset of human metastases characterized by EMT and inflammation41.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Robinson, D. R. et al. Integrative clinical genomics of metastatic cancer. Nature 548, 297–303 (2017) source
- Rests on an assumption: The human tumor cohorts analyzed are representative of human metastatic disease generally.
- Findingnone given
Errors in chromosome segregation create a preponderance of micronuclei whose rupture spills genomic DNA into the cytosol.
“Errors in chromosome segregation create a preponderance of micronuclei whose rupture spills genomic DNA into the cytosol.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The number of chromosomal aberrations was highest in tumor samples with karyotypes ranging between the diploid and tetraploid (4n) range.
“The number of chromosomal aberrations was highest in tumor samples with karyotypes ranging between the diploid and tetraploid (4n) range (Fig. 1b–c and Extended Data Fig. 1c–d).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Metastases had twice as many structural or numerical chromosomal aberrations per clone.
“and had twice as many structural or numerical chromosomal aberrations per clone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Overexpression of Kif2b or MCAK suppressed chromosome missegregation.
“Overexpression of Kif2b or MCAK suppressed chromosome missegregation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
There is a significant association between anaphase chromosome missegregation and the incidence of lymph node metastasis in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
“histologic analysis of primary tumors from patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma11 revealed a significant association between anaphase chromosome missegregation and the incidence of lymph node metastasis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Chung, C. H. et al. Molecular classification of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas using patterns of gene expression. Cancer Cell 5, 489–500 (2004) source
- Findingown data
Metastases exhibited increased wGII compared to primary tumors.
“Metastases exhibited increased wGII compared to primary tumors (Fig. 1a, Extended Data Fig. 1a–b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The human tumor cohorts analyzed are representative of human metastatic disease generally.
- Findingcitation
Primary breast tumors have a predilection for near-diploid (2n) karyotypes.
“karyotype analysis of primary breast tumors and metastases archived in the Mitelman Database of chromosomal translocations10 revealed a predilection for near-diploid (2n) karyotypes in primary tumors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Mitelman, F., Johansson, B. & Mertens, F. Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations and Gene Fusions in Cancerhttps://cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Genetic suppression of CIN significantly delays metastasis even in highly aneuploid tumor models.
“Genetic suppression of CIN significantly delays metastasis even in highly aneuploid tumor models”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Metastases were enriched for cells with near-triploid (3n) karyotypes.
“Conversely, metastases were enriched for cells with near-triploid (3n) karyotypes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Inducing continuous chromosome segregation errors promotes cellular invasion and metastasis in a STING-dependent manner.
“whereas inducing continuous chromosome segregation errors promotes cellular invasion and metastasis in a STING-dependent manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ability of Kif2b or MCAK overexpression to suppress invasion in vitro was dependent on the cell cycle, as the addition of thymidine after transient transfection of either proteins abrogated this phenotype.
“Furthermore, the ability of Kif2b or MCAK overexpression to suppress invasion in vitro was dependent on the cell cycle, as the addition of thymidine after transient transfection of either proteins abrogated this phenotype”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
RNA-seq of primary tumor-derived and metastasis-derived cells revealed pathways that were shared among metastases and CIN-high cells.
“RNA-seq of primary tumor-derived and metastasis-derived cells revealed pathways that were shared among metastases and CIN-high cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
RNA-seq data from primary breast cancer in the TCGA database demonstrated increased expression of CIN-responsive NC-NF-κB genes in tumors with higher CIN signature genes.
“Similarly, RNA-seq data from primary breast cancer in the TCGA database demonstrated increased expression of CIN-responsive NC-NF-κB genes in tumors with higher CIN signature genes (Fig. 6e)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unsupervised graph-based clustering, based on all expressed genes, identified 12 phenotypically distinct subpopulations.
“Unsupervised graph-based clustering, based on all expressed genes, identified 12 phenotypically distinct subpopulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Bulk RNA sequencing of CIN-low and CIN-high MDA-MB-231 cells revealed 1,584 differentially expressed genes.
“Bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of CIN-low and CIN-high MDA-MB-231 cells revealed 1,584 differentially expressed genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a strong positive correlation between inflammation-related, CIN signature, and EMT genes in the scRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq data.
“There was a strong positive correlation between inflammation-related, CIN signature, and EMT genes in the scRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq data”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
One subpopulation defined by increased expression of genes involved in EMT and metastasis (subpopulation 'M') was concomitantly enriched for CIN signature genes.
“One subpopulation was defined by increased expression of genes involved in EMT and metastasis (referred to as subpopulation ‘M’) and was concomitantly enriched for CIN signature genes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Subpopulation M comprised 45% of dnMCAK expressing cells compared to 6% of the CIN-low cells.
“This subpopulation comprised 45% of dnMCAK expressing cells compared to 6% of the CIN-low cells (Fig. 4b and Extended Data Fig. 6a–b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Clustering of single cells using EMT genes successfully classified most cells based on their CIN-status.
“Clustering of single cells using EMT genes successfully classified most cells based on their CIN-status”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Quantification of dsDNA levels after subcellular fractionation revealed a four-fold reduction in cytosolic DNA in CIN-low compared to CIN-high cells.
“Quantification of dsDNA levels after subcellular fractionation revealed a four-fold reduction in cytosolic DNA in CIN-low compared to CIN-high cells (Fig. 5g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Lamin B2 overexpression reduced metastasis after intracardiac or tail vein injections.
“Accordingly, it reduced metastasis after intracardiac or tail vein injections (Fig. 5i and Extended Data Fig. 3g–h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CIN-high cells exhibited increased levels and perinuclear localization of STING congruent with pathway activation.
“Furthermore, CIN-high cells exhibited increased levels and perinuclear localization of STING congruent with pathway activation (Fig. 6c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mice harboring CIN-high cells rapidly succumbed to metastatic disease with a median survival of 70 days.
“mice harboring CIN-high cells rapidly succumbed to metastatic disease with a median survival of 70 days.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cells derived from most primary tumors had significantly lower rates of CIN.
“whereas cells derived from most primary tumors had significantly lower rates of CIN (Fig. 3b–d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Addition of cGAMP increased invasion and migration of CIN-low cells.
“Conversely, the addition of cGAMP increased invasion and migration of CIN-low cells (Fig. 6f–g, Extended Data Figs. 6f, 9j, and 10b-d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Higher expression of key regulators of the noncanonical NF-κB pathway or its CIN responsive target genes was associated with shorter DMFS and disease-free survival in breast and lung cancers.
“and higher expression of key regulators of the noncanonical NF-κB pathway or its CIN responsive target genes was associated with shorter DMFS and disease-free survival in breast and lung cancers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Whole-genome sequencing of subcellular fractions at 30x coverage confirmed the genomic origin of cytosolic DNA.
“Whole-genome sequencing of subcellular fractions at 30x coverage confirmed the genomic origin of cytosolic DNA (not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Similar results were obtained after injection of lung adenocarcinoma H2030 cells.
“Similar results were obtained after injection of lung adenocarcinoma H2030 cells (Fig. 2c–e and Extended Data Fig. 3b–c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Many metastases from CIN-low cells waxed-and-waned and, at times, spontaneously resolved.
“Many metastases from CIN-low cells waxed-and-waned and, at times, spontaneously resolved”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CIN-high cells exhibited increased migratory and invasive behavior in vitro.
“In line with the scRNA-seq data, CIN-high cells exhibited increased migratory and invasive behavior in vitro”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Whole-chromosome FISH probes revealed selective incorporation of the Y chromosome into micronuclei two days following chromosome missegregation induced by doxycycline and auxin treatment.
“Whole-chromosome FISH probes targeting the Y chromosome or an independent autosome (chr15) revealed selective incorporation of the Y chromosome into micronuclei two days following chromosome missegregation induced by doxycycline and auxin (Dox/IAA) treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Bulk RNA-seq data revealed a number of noncanonical NF-κB target genes that were upregulated in response to CIN.
“Bulk RNA-seq data revealed a number of noncanonical NF-κB target genes that were upregulated in response to CIN (CIN-responsive NC-NF-κB genes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A fraction of cells (primarily CIN-high) was highly enriched in mesenchymal markers.
“and revealed a fraction of cells (primarily CIN-high) that was highly enriched in mesenchymal markers (Fig. 4a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Suppression of CIN reduced both numerical and structural karyotypic heterogeneity in single-cell derived clones.
“Suppression of CIN reduced both numerical and structural karyotypic heterogeneity in single-cell derived clones as supported by the presence of fewer chromosomes exhibiting non-clonal structural abnormalities and decreased numerical chromosome heterogeneity in CIN-low cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Metastasis-related and epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) gene sets were relatively enriched in CIN-high cells.
“Metastasis-related and epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) gene sets were relatively enriched in CIN-high cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Regardless of the CIN status of the injected cells, the majority of metastases enriched for higher rates of chromosome missegregation.
“Regardless of the CIN status of the injected cells, the majority of metastases enriched for higher rates of chromosome missegregation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mad2 overexpression rescued invasion and migration of MCAK expressing cells.
“Expectedly, Mad2 overexpression rescued invasion and migration of MCAK expressing cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no evidence for robust activation of downstream canonical NF-κB or type I interferon signaling in CIN-high cells.
“Interestingly, there was no evidence for robust activation of downstream canonical NF-κB or type I interferon signaling in CIN-high cells as evidenced by the lack of a significant increase in p65 or IRF3 phosphorylation, absence of p65 or IRF3 nuclear translocation, undetectable levels of interferon-β, and failure to induce ISGs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CIN-high cells exhibited increased nuclear localization of RelB.
“we assessed the nuclear localization of RelB, the binding partner of p52, and observed increased nuclear localization in CIN-high cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When CIN-high cells were injected in the mammary fat pad, chromosome missegregation rates decreased in the primary tumors before increasing once more in metastases spontaneously arising within the same animal.
“when CIN-high cells (Fig. 3d, dnMCAK, blue bars) were injected in the mammary fat pad, chromosome missegregation rates decreased in the primary tumors (green bars) before increasing once more in metastases spontaneously arising within the same animal (orange bars).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a selective increase in chromosome 1 copy number in metastases compared with primary tumors.
“Heatmap of consensus chromosomal karyotypes of cells derived from primary tumors and metastases showing selective increase in chromosome 1 copy number in metastases compared with primary tumors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A subpopulation of cells (n = 1273 cells) is enriched for EMT and CIN genes (subpopulation 'M') compared with the remaining subpopulations (n = 5548 cells).
“Violin plots showing expression probability density of key metastasis and invasion genes in a subpopulation of cells (n = 1273 cells) enriched for EMT and CIN genes (subpopulation ‘M’) compared with the remaining subpopulations (n = 5548 cells)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Metastasis can be detected in the mouse transplanted with dnMCAK expressing cells at day 90.
“Metastasis can be detected in the mouse transplanted with dnMCAK expressing cells at day 90.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a correlation between the percentage of cells exhibiting evidence of chromosome missegregation and the percentage of micronuclei in all injected cell lines as well as cells derived from primary tumors and metastases.
“Correlation between the percentage of cells exhibiting evidence of chromosome missegregation and percentage of micronuclei in all injected cell lines as well as cells derived from primary tumors and metastases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Chromosomally unstable tumor cells co-opt chronic activation of innate immune pathways to spread to distant organs by subverting lethal epithelial responses to cytosolic DNA.
“By subverting lethal epithelial responses to cytosolic DNA, chromosomally unstable tumor cells co-opt chronic activation of innate immune pathways to spread to distant organs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
CIN promotes metastasis by sustaining a tumor-cell autonomous response to cytosolic DNA.
“Here we show that CIN promotes metastasis by sustaining a tumor-cell autonomous response to cytosolic DNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mouse xenograft and orthotopic models recapitulate human metastatic progression sufficiently to infer CIN's role in human metastasis.
- Interpretationown data
Chromosome 1 loss is a recurrent event during primary tumor growth in this model.
“Thus chromosome 1 loss is a recurrent event during primary tumor growth in this model (Extended Data Figs. 4c–f and 5a–e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
CIN induces a transcriptional shift from a proliferative and highly metabolic state to a mesenchymal state associated with upregulation of inflammatory pathways.
“We found that CIN induces a transcriptional shift from a proliferative and highly metabolic state, ideally suited for primary tumor growth, to a mesenchymal state associated with upregulation of inflammatory pathways”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
STING and downstream noncanonical NF-κB activity are mediators of metastasis in a tumor cell-autonomous fashion.
“We found that STING and downstream noncanonical NF-κB activity are mediators of metastasis in a tumor cell-autonomous fashion”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The mouse xenograft and orthotopic models recapitulate human metastatic progression sufficiently to infer CIN's role in human metastasis.
- Interpretationown data
Cytosolic DNA sensing pathways have an effect on prognosis.
“Effect of cytosolic DNA sensing pathways on prognosis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The CIN signature has a prognostic impact.
“Prognostic impact of the CIN signature”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
There is an alternative response to cytosolic DNA in cancer cells.
“Alternative response to cytosolic DNA in cancer cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
CIN has transcriptional consequences in cancer cells.
“Transcriptional consequences of CIN in cancer cells”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 32
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationOverexpression of Mad2 in MCAK-expressing cells partially rescued chromosome missegregation and correspondingly augmented metastasis.
“Overexpression of the spindle assembly checkpoint protein, Mad2 in MCAK-expressing cells partially rescued chromosome missegregation15, and correspondingly augmented metastasis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Sotillo, R. et al. Mad2 overexpression promotes aneuploidy and tumorigenesis in mice. Cancer Cell 11, 9–23 (2007) source
The Summary (p. 1) and the chromosomal-instability results (p. 5) describe Mad2 overexpression in mice and fibroblasts, not in MCAK-expressing cells. Searches for MCAK, rescue of missegregation, and metastasis found no passage addressing those claimed outcomes. The reported increase in segregation defects without MCAK does not establish what happens when MCAK is expressed. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSuppressing micronuclear envelope rupture through mCherry-Lamin B2 overexpression reduced cytosolic dsDNA staining without influencing chromosome segregation errors.
“Suppressing micronuclear envelope rupture through mCherry-Lamin B2 overexpression20 reduced cytosolic dsDNA staining without influencing chromosome segregation errors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Hatch, E. M., Fischer, A. H., Deerinck, T. J. & Hetzer, M. W. Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei. Cell 154, 47–60 (2013) source
The Results section, “NE collapse is triggered by lamin disorganization” (page unavailable), reports that LmnB2 expression increased the proportion of intact micronuclei. It does not report reduced cytosolic dsDNA staining or test whether LmnB2 overexpression affects chromosome segregation errors. A separate Results passage finds no significant effect of micronuclear disruption on micronucleus formation after a second mitosis, but that is not the stated overexpression comparison. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was evidence for noncanonical NF-κB activation in CIN-high cells as revealed by lower levels of p100, a trend toward higher ratios of p52 and phosphorylated p100 relative to total p100, and lower levels of TRAF2.
“We found evidence for noncanonical NF-κB activation in CIN-high cells as revealed by lower levels of the precursor protein, p100, a trend toward higher ratios of p52 and phosphorylated p100 relative to total p100, as well as lower levels of the noncanonical NF-κB pathway inhibitor, TRAF231”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] Sun, S.-C. Controlling the fate of NIK: a central stage in noncanonical NF-κB signaling. Sci. Signal. 3, pe18 (2010) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThese findings are in line with reported roles for the noncanonical NF-κB pathway in EMT, cellular invasion, and metastasis.
“These findings are in line with reported roles for the noncanonical NF-κB pathway in EMT, cellular invasion, and metastasis33–35.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [33] Wang, X. et al. Oestrogen signalling inhibits invasive phenotype by repressing RelB and its target BCL2. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 470–478 (2007) source
The Abstract reports that RelB promotes EMT and an invasive phenotype in breast cancer cells. It discusses metastasis through prior findings about NF-κB and Bcl-2, and calls for future studies of RelB in metastatic breast disease; it does not establish a role for the RelB pathway in metastasis. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [34] Wang, J., Yi, S., Zhou, J., Zhang, Y. & Guo, F. The NF-κB subunit RelB regulates the migration and invasion abilities and the radio-sensitivity of prostate cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 49, 381–392 (2016) source
The Discussion (p. 10) reports a role for RelB, a noncanonical NF-κB subunit, in EMT in breast cancer cells and shows that RelB knockdown reduced invasion in prostate cancer cells. It discusses links to metastasis, but does not establish that RelB itself promotes metastasis; the authors say in vivo studies remain for future work (Discussion, p. 11). (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [35] Yang, C. et al. Antagonism of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins increases bone metastasis via unexpected osteoclast activation. Cancer Discov. 3, 212–223 (2013) source
The Results section ('Osteoclast expression of constitutively active NIK promotes tumor growth in bone'; page unavailable) links activation of the alternative NF-κB pathway in osteoclasts to increased tumor burden in bone. The Discussion likewise describes promotion of metastatic growth through osteoclast activity. These passages support a role in bone metastatic growth, but do not establish roles in EMT or cellular invasion. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataKinesin-13 overexpression did not alter cellular proliferation or the number of centrosomes per cell.
“Kinesin-13 overexpression did not alter cellular proliferation or the number of centrosomes per cell (Fig. 2a–b, Extended Data Figs. 1f–h and 3a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCIN-low cells maintained highly aneuploid karyotypes, yet faithfully propagated them in a stable manner.
“Importantly, CIN-low cells maintained highly aneuploid karyotypes, yet they faithfully propagated them in a stable manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMetastases from CIN-high cells involved multiple organs and rapidly progressed leading to death.
“whereas metastases from CIN-high cells involved multiple organs and rapidly progressed leading to death.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDepletion of STING, RelB, or p100 (NFKB2) in CIN-high cells reduced metastatic dissemination, extended lifespan, and reduced in vitro and in vivo invasion.
“as evidenced by reduction in metastatic dissemination, lifespan extension, and reduction in in vitro and in vivo invasion in CIN-high cells depleted of STING, RelB, or p100 (NFKB2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAddition of cGAMP or overexpression of Mad2 increased nuclear RelB in MCAK-expressing cells.
“whereas the addition of cGAMP or overexpression of Mad2 increased nuclear RelB in MCAK-expressing cells (Fig. 6d, Extended Data Figs. 4e and 9c–e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe injected cell lines and most metastases had three copies of chromosome 1, whereas primary tumors consistently had 2 copies.
“Karyotype analysis revealed that the injected cell lines and most metastases had three copies of chromosome 1, whereas primary tumors consistently had 2 copies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataInduced missegregation of the Y chromosome led to the upregulation of OAS2 and increased interferon-β production by DLD-1 cells.
“Indeed, induced missegregation of the Y chromosome led to the upregulation of OAS2, an ISG, and increased interferon-β production by DLD-1 cells (Extended Data Fig. 9f–g).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMice injected with CIN-low cells exhibited lower metastatic burden and a median survival of 207 days.
“Conversely, mice injected with CIN-low cells exhibited lower metastatic burden and a median survival of 207 days.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSTING depletion reduced RelB nuclear localization and led to downregulation of EMT and inflammatory pathways.
“STING depletion reduced RelB nuclear localization and led to downregulation of EMT and inflammatory pathways”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe dsDNA signal disappeared after treatment with double-strand-specific nuclease and after overexpression of Dnase2, confirming the specificity of the antibodies.
“The dsDNA signal, which was distinct from mitochondrial staining, disappeared after treatment with double-strand-specific – but not single-strand-specific – nuclease and after overexpression of Dnase2, confirming the specificity of these antibodies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSuppression of CIN had no effect on primary tumor implantation efficiency and even enhanced primary tumor growth in the 4T1 model.
“Suppression of CIN had no effect on primary tumor implantation efficiency and even enhanced primary tumor growth in the 4T1 model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataY chromosome-specific fragments were found dispersed within the cytosol 2-3 days after Dox/IAA addition, whereas the control autosome remained confined to the nucleus.
“Strikingly, Y chromosome-specific fragments were found dispersed within the cytosol 2–3 days after Dox/IAA addition, whereas the control autosome remained confined to the nucleus (Fig. 5h), demonstrating that cytosolic DNA is generated from chromosomes undergoing high rates of missegregation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn both orthotopic models, suppression of CIN significantly reduced spontaneous metastasis and prolonged survival.
“Yet, in both models, suppression of CIN significantly reduced spontaneous metastasis and prolonged survival (Extended Data Fig. 3d–e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGene-gene Pearson correlation analysis using scRNA-seq data identified two large gene modules: module 1 characterized by proliferative and metabolic pathways, and module 2 comprising EMT and inflammation gene sets.
“we performed a gene-gene Pearson correlation analysis using scRNA-seq data and identified two large gene modules: module 1 was characterized by proliferative and metabolic pathways, whereas module 2 comprised EMT and inflammation gene sets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataRhoA and Rac1 pull-down assays revealed low basal levels of activity and no correlation with kinesin-13 overexpression.
“We ruled out a direct role for kinesin-13-mediated microtubule depolymerization in activating small GTPases14 by performing RhoA and Rac1 pull-down assays, which revealed low basal levels of activity and no correlation with kinesin-13 overexpression”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Waterman-Storer, C. M., Worthylake, R. A., Liu, B. P., Burridge, K. & Salmon, E. D. Microtubule growth activates Rac1 to promote lamellipodial protrusion in fibroblasts. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 45–50 (1999) source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPCA and unsupervised clustering accurately separated samples according to their CIN status.
“Principle component analysis (PCA) and unsupervised clustering accurately separated samples according to their CIN status.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere was a robust correlation between the CIN signature, STING, and the CIN-responsive NC-NF-κB genes in scRNA-seq data, in contrast to a weaker correlation between CIN and type I interferon targets.
“There was a robust correlation between the CIN signature, STING, and the CIN-responsive NC-NF-κB genes in scRNA-seq data, in contrast to a weaker correlation between CIN and type I interferon targets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIncreased canonical NF-κB or type I interferon regulatory factors were associated with an improved prognosis.
“Conversely, increased canonical NF-κB or type I interferon regulatory factors were associated with an improved prognosis (Extended Data Fig. 10a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCIN-high cells had increased cytosolic dsDNA and single-stranded DNA.
“we stained cells using two different anti-dsDNA antibodies after selective plasma membrane permeabilization and found increased cytosolic dsDNA and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) in CIN-high cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCIN-high cells and those derived from metastases exhibited a higher preponderance of micronuclei compared with CIN-low or primary tumor-derived cells, respectively.
“CIN-high cells and those derived from metastases exhibited a higher preponderance of micronuclei compared with CIN-low or primary tumor-derived cells, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCIN-high cells displayed evidence of actin cytoskeletal reorganization, diffuse vimentin staining, and increased cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of β-catenin.
“and displayed evidence of actin cytoskeletal reorganization, diffuse vimentin staining, and increased cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of β-catenin (Extended Data Figs. 6c–d and 7a–d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMetastases contained a large number of differentially upregulated EMT and inflammation-related genes that were disproportionately clustered on chromosome 1, signifying chromosome 1-specific selection.
“Yet, metastases contained a large number of differentially upregulated EMT and inflammation-related genes that were disproportionately clustered on chromosome 1, signifying chromosome 1-specific selection.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataChanges in β-catenin are seen upon alteration of CIN; β-catenin is enriched at cell-to-cell junctions in MCAK expressing cells but cytoplasmic and nuclear in dnMCAK expressing cells.
“Changes in β-catenin are seen upon alteration of CIN; enriched at cell-to-cell junctions in MCAK expressing cells but cytoplasmic and nuclear in dnMCAK expressing cells”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCytosolic DNA leads to activation of the cGAS-STING cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway and downstream noncanonical NF-κB signaling.
“This leads to the activation of the cGAS-STING cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway and downstream noncanonical NF-κB signaling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCIN generates micronuclei and cytosolic DNA.
“CIN generates micronuclei and cytosolic DNA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenThere was no need to randomize animals.
“There was no need to randomize animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenDiploid controls were used to determine the false positive rate of the centromeric probes.
“Diploid controls were used to determine false positive rate of the centromeric probes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenInvestigators were not blinded to group allocation.
“Investigators were not blinded to group allocation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll cells tested negative for mycoplasma.
“All cells tested negative for mycoplasma.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOngoing chromosome missegregation is required to replenish cytosolic DNA pools and to maintain cells in a pro-metastatic state.
“ongoing chromosome missegregation is required to replenish cytosolic DNA pools and to maintain cells in a pro-metastatic state.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFor each FISH probe, three normal peripheral blood samples were analyzed to derive cut-off values (false-positive).
“For each probe, three normal peripheral blood samples (GM07535, GM06875 and GM00558), obtained from Coriell Institute (Camden, New Jersey) were also analyzed to derive cut-off values (false-positive).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCIN promotes the formation and maintenance of metastasis.
“CIN promotes formation and maintenance of metastasis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenFor each sample a minimum of 20 inverted DAPI-stained metaphases were fully karyotyped and analyzed according to ISCN 2013.
“For each sample a minimum of 20 inverted DAPI-stained metaphases were fully karyotyped and analyzed according to the International System of Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN) 2013.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe scRNA-seq analysis was robust to imputation, and similar results were obtained without imputed data.
“Our analysis was robust to imputation and we obtained similar results without imputed data (not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataPower analysis indicated that 10 mice per group will be sufficient to detect a difference at relative hazard ratios of <0.25 or >4.0 with 80% power and 95% confidence in 4T1 experiments.
“For the 4T1 experiments, Power analysis indicates that 10 mice per group will be sufficient to detect a difference at relative hazard ratios of <0.25 or >4.0 with 80% power and 95% confidence, given a median survival of 58 days in the control group and a total follow up period of 180 days.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningData was pre-processed to filter out cells with low total molecule counts, low complexity and high mitochondrial content, identified by a bimodal fit, to minimize the effects of experimental artifacts on the analysis.
“Additionally, to minimize the effects of experimental artifacts on the analysis, data was pre-processed to filter out cells with low total molecule counts (library size), low complexity and high mitochondrial content, identified by a bimodal fit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe evolutionary benefits of the noncanonical pathway would justify the scarcity of inactivating mutations in cGAS and STING among breast and lung cancers.
“The evolutionary benefits of the noncanonical pathway would justify the scarcity of inactivating mutations in cGAS and STING among breast and lung cancers (Extended Data Fig. 10e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataPower analysis indicated that 10 mice per group will be sufficient to detect a difference at relative hazard ratios of <0.2 or >5 with 80% power and 95% confidence in MDA-MB-231 experiments.
“For disease-specific survival in MDA-MB-231 experiments, power analysis indicated that 10 mice per group will be sufficient to detect a difference at relative hazard ratios of <0.2 or >5 with 80% power and 95% confidence, given a median disease-specific survival of 3 months in the control group and a total follow up period of 250 days.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenMitochondria were purified at 12,000xg to minimize their contamination in the cytosolic fraction.
“Mitochondria were purified at 12,000xg to minimize their contamination in the cytosolic fraction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCIN promotes in vitro invasion and migration.
“CIN promotes in vitro invasion and migration”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The role of CIN in metastasis has not been established.
“its role in metastasis has not been established.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mouse xenograft and orthotopic models recapitulate human metastatic progression sufficiently to infer CIN's role in human metastasis.
“We injected MDA-MB-231 cells into the left cardiac ventricles of athymic mice to enable systemic dissemination while tracking metastatic colonization using a bioluminescence reporter.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The human tumor cohorts analyzed are representative of human metastatic disease generally.
“we applied the weighted-genomic integrity index (wGII) as a proxy for CIN8 on 79 primary tumor-brain metastases matched pairs from a recently published cohort9.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MN play a critical pathogenic role in cancer genome evolution and metastasis by driving genomic instability through chromothripsis.
“While MN have been proposed to activate as tumor suppressor pathways, MN also play a critical pathogenic role in the evolution of cancer genomes and metastasis by driving genomic instability through chromothripsis (Bakhoum et al., 2018; Umbreit et al., 2020; Ye et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2015).”
From Cytoplasmic DNA: sources, sensing, and role in aging and disease (2021) · cites this paper as Bakhoum et al., 2018
STING-dependent activation of noncanonical NF-κB signaling due to ruptured MN promotes metastasis.
“Moreover, STING-dependent activation of noncanonical NF-κB signaling, due to ruptured MN, promotes metastasis (Bakhoum et al., 2018).”
From Cytoplasmic DNA: sources, sensing, and role in aging and disease (2021) · cites this paper as Bakhoum et al., 2018
In breast and lung cancers, suppressing chromosomal instability and associated cytoDNA reduces metastasis.
“For example, in breast and lung cancers, suppression of chromosomal instability and associated cytoDNA decreases metastasis (Bakhoum et al., 2018).”
From Cytoplasmic DNA: sources, sensing, and role in aging and disease (2021) · cites this paper as Bakhoum et al., 2018
Differences have been observed in the expression of essential genes in the cGAS-STING signaling mechanism between normal and malignant tissues, along with MB21D1-encoding cGAS, TMEM-173-encoding STING, TBK-1 and IRF-3.
“Researchers have observed differences in the expression of essential genes in the cGAS‐STING signaling mechanism between normal and malignant tissues, along with MB21D1‐encoding cGAS, transmembrane protein 173 (TMEM‐173)‐encoding STING, TANK‐binding kinase 1 (TBK‐1) and interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF‐3).”
From Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression (2023) · cites this paper as [253]
The four genes MB21D1, TMEM173, TBK1 and IRF3 were significantly elevated in almost all cancer models, suggesting that cGAS-STING signal transduction might be stimulated in all cancer types.
“Comprehensive research and recent evidence proved that these four genes were significantly elevated in almost all cancer models, suggesting that cGAS‐STING signal transduction might be stimulated in all cancer types [252, 253].”
From Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression (2023) · cites this paper as [253]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Noncanonical NF-κB protein ratios differ between the text and figure caption
MinorThe text describes ratios of p52 and phosphorylated p100 to total p100. The Extended Data Figure 8 caption instead names phosphorylated p52-to-p100 and p100-to-total p100 ratios.
“a trend toward higher ratios of p52 and phosphorylated p100 relative to total p100”
“Normalized ratio of phosphorylated p52-to-p100 (left) and p100-to-total p100 (right) protein levels.”
PCR indexing step is described as both 10 and 14 cycles
MinorThe methods give two different cycle counts for the same sample-index PCR amplification.
“A unique sample index for each library was introduced through 10 cycles of PCR amplification”
“(98°C for 45 s; 98°C for 20s, 60°C for 30s, and 72°C for 20 s x 14 cycles; 72°C for 1min; held at 4°C).”
Cites
Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2
Love, M. I., Huber, W., & Anders, S. (2014) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · Cited by 95,106 · see citing works
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625 · see citing works
STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner
Dobin, A., Davis, C. A., Schlesinger, F., Drenkow, J., Zaleski, C., Jha, S., Batut, P., Chaisson, M., & Gingeras, T. R. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · Cited by 51,709 · see citing works
HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T., & Huber, W. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 · Cited by 21,464 · see citing works
Trapnell, C., Williams, B. A., Pertea, G., Mortazavi, A., Kwan, G., van Baren, M. J., Salzberg, S. L., Wold, B. J., & Pachter, L. (2010) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1621 · Cited by 15,556 · see citing works
Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells
Zheng, G. X. Y., Terry, J. M., Belgrader, P., Ryvkin, P., Bent, Z. W., Wilson, R., Ziraldo, S. B., Wheeler, T. D., McDermott, G. P., Zhu, J., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms14049 · Cited by 7,353 · see citing works
Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase Is a Cytosolic DNA Sensor That Activates the Type I Interferon Pathway
Sun, L., Wu, J., Du, F., Chen, X., & Chen, Z. J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232458 · Cited by 4,996 · see citing works
circlize implements and enhances circular visualization in R
Gu, Z., Gu, L., Eils, R., Schlesner, M., & Brors, B. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu393 · Cited by 4,290 · see citing works
Györffy, B., Lanczky, A., Eklund, A. C., Denkert, C., Budczies, J., Li, Q., & Szallasi, Z. (2010) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-009-0674-9 · Cited by 4,169 · see citing works
Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows
Di Tommaso, P., Chatzou, M., Floden, E. W., Barja, P. P., Palumbo, E., & Notredame, C. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3820 · Cited by 4,001 · see citing works
Clonal neoantigens elicit T cell immunoreactivity and sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade
McGranahan, N., Furness, A. J. S., Rosenthal, R., Ramskov, S., Lyngaa, R., Saini, S. K., Jamal-Hanjani, M., Wilson, G. A., Birkbak, N. J., Hiley, C. T., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1490 · Cited by 3,065 · see citing works
Self-citationTracking the Evolution of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Jamal-Hanjani, M., Wilson, G. A., McGranahan, N., Birkbak, N. J., Watkins, T. B. K., Veeriah, S., Shafi, S., Johnson, D. H., Mitter, R., Rosenthal, R., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1616288 · Cited by 2,349 · see citing works
Self-citationData-Driven Phenotypic Dissection of AML Reveals Progenitor-like Cells that Correlate with Prognosis
Levine, J. H., Simonds, E. F., Bendall, S. C., Davis, K. L., Amir, E.-A. D., Tadmor, M. D., Litvin, O., Fienberg, H. G., Jager, A., Zunder, E. R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.047 · Cited by 2,303 · see citing works
Self-citationRecovering Gene Interactions from Single-Cell Data Using Data Diffusion
van Dijk, D., Sharma, R., Nainys, J., Yim, K., Kathail, P., Carr, A. J., Burdziak, C., Moon, K. R., Chaffer, C. L., Pattabiraman, D., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.061 · Cited by 1,829 · see citing works
Self-citationGyőrffy, B., Surowiak, P., Budczies, J., & Lánczky, A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082241 · Cited by 1,763 · see citing works
cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity
Mackenzie, K. J., Carroll, P., Martin, C.-A., Murina, O., Fluteau, A., Simpson, D. J., Olova, N., Sutcliffe, H., Rainger, J. K., Leitch, A., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23449 · Cited by 1,752 · see citing works
Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei
Harding, S. M., Benci, J. L., Irianto, J., Discher, D. E., Minn, A. J., & Greenberg, R. A. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23470 · Cited by 1,508 · see citing works
Cytoplasmic chromatin triggers inflammation in senescence and cancer
Dou, Z., Ghosh, K., Vizioli, M. G., Zhu, J., Sen, P., Wangensteen, K. J., Simithy, J., Lan, Y., Lin, Y., Zhou, Z., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature24050 · Cited by 1,335 · see citing works
Nuclear envelope rupture and repair during cancer cell migration
Denais, C. M., Gilbert, R. M., Isermann, P., McGregor, A. L., te Lindert, M., Weigelin, B., Davidson, P. M., Friedl, P., Wolf, K., & Lammerding, J. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad7297 · Cited by 1,318 · see citing works
Self-citationTrex1 prevents cell-intrinsic initiation of autoimmunity
Stetson, D. B., Ko, J. S., Heidmann, T., & Medzhitov, R. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.032 · Cited by 1,280 · see citing works
Brastianos, P. K., Carter, S. L., Santagata, S., Cahill, D. P., Taylor-Weiner, A. N., Jones, R. T., Allen, E. M. V., Lawrence, M. S., Horowitz, P. M., Cibulskis, K., et al. (2015) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-15-0369 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
cGAS is essential for cellular senescence
Yang, H., Wang, H., Ren, J., Chen, Q., & Chen, Z. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1705499114 · Cited by 1,009 · see citing works
Carcinoma–astrocyte gap junctions promote brain metastasis by cGAMP transfer
Chen, Q., Boire, A., Jin, X., Valiente, M., Er, E. E., Lopez-Soto, A., S. Jacob, L., Patwa, R., Shah, H., Xu, K., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18268 · Cited by 969 · see citing works
Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability
Burrell, R. A., McClelland, S. E., Endesfelder, D., Groth, P., Weller, M.-C., Shaikh, N., Domingo, E., Kanu, N., Dewhurst, S. M., Gronroos, E. C., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11935 · Cited by 868 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrative clinical genomics of metastatic cancer
Robinson, D. R., Wu, Y.-M., Lonigro, R. J., Vats, P., Cobain, E., Everett, J., Cao, X., Rabban, E., Kumar-Sinha, C., Raymond, V., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23306 · Cited by 863 · see citing works
Abe, T., & Barber, G. N. (2014) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.00037-14 · Cited by 767 · see citing works
Catastrophic nuclear envelope collapse in cancer cell micronuclei
Hatch, E. M., Fischer, A. H., Deerinck, T. J., & Hetzer, M. W. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.007 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Aneuploidy Acts Both Oncogenically and as a Tumor Suppressor
Weaver, B. A. A., Silk, A. D., Montagna, C., Verdier-Pinard, P., & Cleveland, D. W. (2007) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.12.003 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
Self-citationHatzis, C. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.593 · Cited by 699 · see citing works
Molecular classification of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas using patterns of gene expression
Chung, C. H., Parker, J. S., Karaca, G., Wu, J., Funkhouser, W. K., Moore, D., Butterfoss, D., Xiang, D., Zanation, A., Yin, X., et al. (2004) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(04)00112-6 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Self-citationMetastasis as an evolutionary process
Turajlic, S., & Swanton, C. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf2784 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Self-citationMad2 Overexpression Promotes Aneuploidy and Tumorigenesis in Mice
Sotillo, R., Hernando, E., Díaz-Rodríguez, E., Teruya-Feldstein, J., Cordón-Cardo, C., Lowe, S. W., & Benezra, R. (2007) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.019 · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Cimini, D., Howell, B., Maddox, P., Khodjakov, A., Degrassi, F., & Salmon, E. D. (2001) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.153.3.517 · Cited by 568 · see citing works
Examining the link between chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in human cells
Thompson, S. L., & Compton, D. A. (2008) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200712029 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Signalling strength determines proapoptotic functions of STING
Gulen, M. F., Koch, U., Haag, S. M., Schuler, F., Apetoh, L., Villunger, A., Radtke, F., & Ablasser, A. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00573-w · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Microtubule growth activates Rac1 to promote lamellipodial protrusion in fibroblasts
Waterman-Storer, C. M., Worthylake, R. A., Liu, B. P., Burridge, K., & Salmon, E. D. (1999) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/9018 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore–microtubule dynamics
Bakhoum, S. F., Thompson, S. L., Manning, A. L., & Compton, D. A. (2009) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1809 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Self-citationBurrell, R. A., McClelland, S. E., Endesfelder, D., Groth, P., Weller, M.-C., Shaikh, N., Domingo, E., Kanu, N., Dewhurst, S. M., Gronroos, E. C., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12369 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Self-citationDNA tumor virus oncogenes antagonize the cGAS-STING DNA-sensing pathway
Lau, L., Gray, E. E., Brunette, R. L., & Stetson, D. B. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aab3291 · Cited by 450 · see citing works
Inflammation-driven carcinogenesis is mediated through STING
Ahn, J., Xia, T., Konno, H., Konno, K., Ruiz, P., & Barber, G. N. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6166 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Nuclear Deformability Constitutes a Rate-Limiting Step During Cell Migration in 3-D Environments
Davidson, P. M., Denais, C., Bakshi, M. C., & Lammerding, J. (2014) · Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering · doi:10.1007/s12195-014-0342-y · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Self-citationLy, P., Teitz, L. S., Kim, D. H., Shoshani, O., Skaletsky, H., Fachinetti, D., Page, D. C., & Cleveland, D. W. (2016) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3450 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Self-citationXenome—a tool for classifying reads from xenograft samples
Conway, T., Wazny, J., Bromage, A., Tymms, M., Sooraj, D., Williams, E. D., & Beresford-Smith, B. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts236 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Dnase2a deficiency uncovers lysosomal clearance of damaged nuclear DNA via autophagy
Lan, Y. Y., Londoño, D., Bouley, R., Rooney, M. S., & Hacohen, N. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.074 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Oestrogen signalling inhibits invasive phenotype by repressing RelB and its target BCL2
Wang, X., Belguise, K., Kersual, N., Kirsch, K. H., Mineva, N. D., Galtier, F., Chalbos, D., & Sonenshein, G. E. (2007) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1559 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Single-chromosome Gains Commonly Function as Tumor Suppressors
Sheltzer, J. M., Ko, J. H., Replogle, J. M., Habibe Burgos, N. C., Chung, E. S., Meehl, C. M., Sayles, N. M., Passerini, V., Storchova, Z., & Amon, A. (2017) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.12.004 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
van Dijk, D., Nainys, J., Sharma, R., et al. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/111591 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Kinesin-13s in mitosis: Key players in the spatial and temporal organization of spindle microtubules
Ems-McClung, S. C., & Walczak, C. E. (2010) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.01.016 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
The mitotic origin of chromosomal instability
Bakhoum, S. F., Silkworth, W. T., Nardi, I. K., Nicholson, J. M., Compton, D. A., & Cimini, D. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.019 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationMCAK associates with the tips of polymerizing microtubules
Moore, A. T., Rankin, K. E., von Dassow, G., Peris, L., Wagenbach, M., Ovechkina, Y., Andrieux, A., Job, D., & Wordeman, L. (2005) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200411089 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Chromosomal Instability Substantiates Poor Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Bakhoum, S. F. W., Danilova, O. V., Kaur, P., Levy, N. B., & Compton, D. A. (2011) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-2049 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationSheltzer, J. M. (2013) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-0749 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Numerical chromosomal instability mediates susceptibility to radiation treatment
Bakhoum, S. F., Kabeche, L., Wood, M. D., Laucius, C. D., Qu, D., Laughney, A. M., Reynolds, G. E., Louie, R. J., Phillips, J., Chan, D. A., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms6990 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationRowald, K., Mantovan, M., Passos, J., Buccitelli, C., Mardin, B. R., Korbel, J. O., Jechlinger, M., & Sotillo, R. (2016) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.048 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Cytosolic DNA-Activated Human Dendritic Cells Are Potent Activators of the Adaptive Immune Response
Kis‐Tóth, K., Szántó, A., Thai, T., & Tsokos, G. C. (2011) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1100469 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Preter, K. D., Barriot, R., Speleman, F., Vandesompele, J., & Moreau, Y. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkn114 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Controlling the Fate of NIK: A Central Stage in Noncanonical NF-κB Signaling
Sun, S.-C. (2010) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.3123pe18 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Yang, C., Davis, J. L., Zeng, R., Vora, P., Su, X., Collins, L. I., Vangveravong, S., Mach, R. H., Piwnica-Worms, D., Weilbaecher, K. N., et al. (2013) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0271 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Zaki, B. I., Suriawinata, A. A., Eastman, A. R., Garner, K. M., & Bakhoum, S. F. W. (2014) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28656 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationWANG, J., YI, S., ZHOU, J., ZHANG, Y., & GUO, F. (2016) · International Journal of Oncology · doi:10.3892/ijo.2016.3500 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reassessment of exosome composition
Jeppesen, D. K., Fenix, A. M., Franklin, J. L., Higginbotham, J. N., Zhang, Q., Zimmerman, L. J., Liebler, D. C., Ping, J., Liu, Q., Evans, R., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.029 · Cited by 2,975 · see citing works
The molecular machinery of regulated cell death
Tang, D., Kang, R., Berghe, T. V., Vandenabeele, P., & Kroemer, G. (2019) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/s41422-019-0164-5 · Cited by 2,595 · see citing works
Molecular principles of metastasis: a hallmark of cancer revisited
Fares, J., Fares, M. Y., Khachfe, H. H., Salhab, H. A., & Fares, Y. (2020) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-020-0134-x · Cited by 2,423 · see citing works
The cGAS–STING pathway as a therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases
Decout, A., Katz, J. D., Venkatraman, S., & Ablasser, A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-021-00524-z · Cited by 2,309 · see citing works
Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS–STING signalling
Hopfner, K.-P., & Hornung, V. (2020) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0244-x · Cited by 2,052 · see citing works
DAMP-sensing receptors in sterile inflammation and inflammatory diseases
Gong, T., Liu, L., Jiang, W., & Zhou, R. (2020) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0215-7 · Cited by 1,672 · see citing works
DNA sensing by the cGAS–STING pathway in health and disease
Motwani, M., Pesiridis, S., & Fitzgerald, K. A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0151-1 · Cited by 1,467 · see citing works
The Cytosolic DNA-Sensing cGAS–STING Pathway in Cancer
Kwon, J., & Bakhoum, S. F. (2020) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0761 · Cited by 1,293 · see citing works
“Recent work has demonstrated an important link between chromosome instability (CIN) and tumor metastasis (62).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationExosome-Mediated Metastasis: Communication from a Distance
Wortzel, I., Dror, S., Kenific, C. M., & Lyden, D. C. (2019) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2019.04.011 · Cited by 1,279 · see citing works
cGAS in action: Expanding roles in immunity and inflammation
Ablasser, A., & Chen, Z. J. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8657 · Cited by 1,077 · see citing works
“In addition, cGAS-STING signaling has been shown to activate canonical and—in cancer cells— noncanonical nuclear factor kB (NF-kB),mitogenactivated protein (MAP) kinases, and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) transcription factors (28, 29).”
BackgroundMitochondrial control of inflammation
Marchi, S., Guilbaud, E., Tait, S. W. G., Yamazaki, T., & Galluzzi, L. (2023) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41577-022-00760-x · Cited by 1,027 · see citing works
Breast cancer: pathogenesis and treatments
Xiong, X., Zheng, L., Ding, Y., Chen, Y., Cai, Y., Wang, L., Huang, L., Liu, C., Shao, Z., & Yu, K. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-02108-4 · Cited by 1,098 · see citing works
Gerstberger, S. C., Jiang, Q., & Ganesh, K. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.003 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
The Multifaceted Role of Chromosomal Instability in Cancer and Its Microenvironment
Bakhoum, S. F. W., & Cantley, L. C. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.027 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Self-citationcGAS-STING, an important pathway in cancer immunotherapy
Jiang, M., Chen, P., Wang, L., Li, W., Chen, B., Liu, Y., Wang, H., Zhao, S., Ye, L., He, Y., et al. (2020) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-020-00916-z · Cited by 647 · see citing works
“This regulation was reported related to the secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines by activation of NF-κB signaling and metastasis [74] (Fig.”
BackgroundThe cGAS–STING pathway and cancer
Samson, N., & Ablasser, A. (2022) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-022-00468-w · Cited by 705 · see citing works
Context is everything: aneuploidy in cancer
Ben‐David, U., & Amon, A. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0171-x · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Resolving genetic heterogeneity in cancer
Turajlic, S., Sottoriva, A., Graham, T. A., & Swanton, C. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0114-6 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Self-citationNguyen, B., Fong, C. J., Luthra, A., Smith, S. A., DiNatale, R. G., Nandakumar, S., Walch, H. S., Chatila, W. K., Madupuri, R., Kundra, R., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.003 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
Self-citationYum, S., Li, M., Fang, Y., & Chen, Z. J. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2100225118 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
“In addition to regulating IFN expression, NF-κB signaling not only induces inflammatory cytokines that promote immune cell functions but also provides an inflammatory tumor microenvironment that can promote tumor survival and metastasis (29).”
BackgroundThe hallmarks of cancer immune evasion
Galassi, C., Chan, T. A.-T., Vitale, I., & Galluzzi, L. (2024) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2024.09.010 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Suppression of STING Associated with LKB1 Loss in KRAS-Driven Lung Cancer
Kitajima, S., Ivanova, E., Guo, S., Yoshida, R., Campisi, M., Sundararaman, S. K., Tange, S., Mitsuishi, Y., Thai, T. C., Masuda, S., et al. (2019) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0689 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
“STING is activated in certain cellular contexts that favor prosurvival signaling, such as aneuploid or endogenous retrovirus-expressing mesenchymal tumor cell subpopulations, resulting in preferential secretion of metastasis and tumorpromoting cytokines/chemokines (18, 19).”
BackgroundMolecular mechanisms of mitochondrial DNA release and activation of the cGAS-STING pathway
Kim, J., Kim, H., & Chung, J. H. (2023) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-023-00965-7 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
DAMPs and DAMP-sensing receptors in inflammation and diseases
Ma, M., Jiang, W., & Zhou, R. (2024) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2024.03.002 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Mechanics and functional consequences of nuclear deformations
Kalukula, Y., Stephens, A. D., Lammerding, J., & Gabriele, S. (2022) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-022-00480-z · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Self-citationSingle-cell analysis reveals new evolutionary complexity in uveal melanoma
Durante, M. A., Rodriguez, D. A., Kurtenbach, S., Kuznetsoff, J. N., Sanchez, M. I., Decatur, C. L., Snyder, H., Feun, L. G., Livingstone, A. S., & Harbour, J. W. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-14256-1 · Cited by 456 · see citing works
Cellular functions of cGAS-STING signaling
Chen, C., & Xu, P. (2022) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2022.11.001 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
Systems Biology of Cancer Metastasis
Suhail, Y., Cain, M. P., Vanaja, K. G., Kurywchak, P. A., Levchenko, A., Kalluri, R., & Gupta, K. (2019) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2019.07.003 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
“Cancer cells are capable of morphologically adapting to the physical constraints of the microenvironment, including deformation of the rigid nucleus, which, in turn, can lead to chromosomal instability, altered gene expression, and metastasis(Bakhoum et al., 2018).”
BackgroundCopy number signatures and mutational processes in ovarian carcinoma
Macintyre, G., Goranova, T., Silva, D. D., Ennis, D. P., Piskorz, A., Eldridge, M., Sie, D., Lewsley, L.-A., Hanif, A., Wilson, C. A., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0179-8 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Magnitude of Therapeutic STING Activation Determines CD8+ T Cell-Mediated Anti-tumor Immunity
Sivick, K. E., Desbien, A. L., Glickman, L. H., Reiner, G. L., Corrales, L., Surh, N. H., Hudson, T. E., Vu, U. T., Francica, B. J., Banda, T., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.11.047 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
“, 2018), because it was found that chronic STING activation in tumor cells was associated with non-canonical NF-kB pathway activation and metastasis (Bakhoum et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSTING: a master regulator in the cancer-immunity cycle
Zhu, Y., An, X., Zhang, X., Qiao, Y., Zheng, T., & Li, X. (2019) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-019-1087-y · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Cellular origins of dsRNA, their recognition and consequences
Chen, Y. G., & Hur, S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-021-00430-1 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Redox homeostasis maintained by GPX4 facilitates STING activation
Jia, M., Qin, D., Zhao, C., Chai, L., Yu, Z., Wang, W., Li, T., Lv, L., Wang, Y., Rehwinkel, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-020-0699-0 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Interferons α and β in cancer: therapeutic opportunities from new insights
Borden, E. C. (2019) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-018-0011-2 · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Dai, E., Han, L., Liu, J., Xie, Y., Zeh, H. J., Kang, R., Bai, L., & Tang, D. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20154-8 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
The Cytoplasmic DNA Sensor cGAS Promotes Mitotic Cell Death
Zierhut, C., Yamaguchi, N., Paredes, M. C. G., Luo, J., Carroll, T., & Funabiki, H. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.035 · Cited by 403 · see citing works
“The cGAS pathway is also expected to become activated in slipped cells due to the generation of micronuclei, and, within tumors, may mediate inflammation, senescence-like gene expression patterns, and metastasis (Bakhoum et al., 2018; Barber, 2015; Harding et al., 2017;Mackenzie et al., 2017;Mitchison et al., 2017).”
BackgroundStructure of the Human cGAS–DNA Complex Reveals Enhanced Control of Immune Surveillance
Zhou, W., Whiteley, A. T., Mann, C. C. D. O., Morehouse, B. R., Nowak, R. P., Fischer, E. S., Gray, N. S., Mekalanos, J. J., & Kranzusch, P. J. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.026 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Lymph node colonization induces tumor-immune tolerance to promote distant metastasis
Reticker-Flynn, N. E., Zhang, W., Belk, J. A., Basto, P. A., Escalante, N. K., Pilarowski, G. O. W., Bejnood, A., Martins, M. M., Kenkel, J. A., Linde, I. L., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.019 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Immunological impact of cell death signaling driven by radiation on the tumor microenvironment
Rodriguez-Ruiz, M. E., Vitale, I., Harrington, K. J., Melero, I., & Galluzzi, L. (2020) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41590-019-0561-4 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
cGAS–STING drives the IL-6-dependent survival of chromosomally instable cancers
Hong, C., Schubert, M., Tijhuis, A. E., Requesens, M., Roorda, M., van den Brink, A., Ruiz, L. A., Bakker, P. L., van der Sluis, T., Pieters, W., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04847-2 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Pervasive chromosomal instability and karyotype order in tumour evolution
Watkins, T. B. K., Lim, E. L., Petković, M., Elizalde, S., Birkbak, N. J., Wilson, G. A., Moore, D. A., Gronroos, E. C., Rowan, A., Dewhurst, S. M., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2698-6 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Self-citationTumour budding in solid cancers
Lugli, A., Zlobec, I., Berger, M. D., Kirsch, R., & Nagtegaal, I. D. (2020) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-020-0422-y · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Carozza, J. A., Böhnert, V., Nguyen, K. C., Skariah, G. M., Shaw, K. E., Brown, J. A., Rafat, M., von Eyben, R., Graves, E. E., Glenn, J. S., et al. (2020) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-020-0028-4 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Chemical and Biomolecular Strategies for STING Pathway Activation in Cancer Immunotherapy
Garland, K. M., Sheehy, T. L., & Wilson, J. T. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00750 · Cited by 368 · see citing works
New frontiers in the cGAS-STING intracellular DNA-sensing pathway
Dvorkin, S., Cambier, S., Volkman, H. E., & Stetson, D. B. (2024) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2024.02.019 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Mutant p53 Suppresses Innate Immune Signaling to Promote Tumorigenesis
Ghosh, M., Saha, S., Bettke, J. A., Nagar, R., Parrales, A., Iwakuma, T., van der Velden, A. W. M., & Martinez, L. A. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2021.01.003 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
STING pathway agonism as a cancer therapeutic
Flood, B. A., Higgs, E. F., Li, S., Luke, J. J., & Gajewski, T. F. (2019) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12765 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
SLC19A1 is an importer of the immunotransmitter cGAMP.
Ritchie, C., Cordova, A. F., Hess, G. T., Bassik, M. C., & Li, L. (2019) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2019.05.006 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Comprehensive elaboration of the cGAS-STING signaling axis in cancer development and immunotherapy
Zheng, J., Mo, J., Zhu, T., Zhuo, W., Yi, Y., Hu, S., Yin, J., Zhang, W., Zhou, H., & Liu, Z. (2020) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-020-01250-1 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Overcoming resistance to tumor-targeted and immune-targeted therapies
Aldea, M., Andre, F., Marabelle, A., Dogan, S., Barlesi, F., & Soria, J.-C. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1638 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Tumor microenvironment signaling and therapeutics in cancer progression
Goenka, A., Khan, F., Verma, B., Sinha, P., Dmello, C. C., Jogalekar, M. P., Gangadaran, P., & Ahn, B. (2023) · Cancer Communications · doi:10.1002/cac2.12416 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Causes and consequences of micronuclei
Krupina, K., Goginashvili, A., & Cleveland, D. W. (2021) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2021.01.004 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Self-citationDNA Damage and Cancer Immunotherapy: A STING in the Tale
Reisländer, T., Groelly, F. J., & Tarsounas, M. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.07.026 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Metastasis and Immune Evasion from Extracellular cGAMP Hydrolysis
Li, J., Duran, M. A., Dhanota, N., Chatila, W. K., Bettigole, S. E., Kwon, J., Sriram, R. K., Humphries, M. P., Salto-Tellez, M., James, J. A., et al. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-0387 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
“We had recently shown that tumor cell-intrinsic STING activation by intracellular cGAMP can also promote cellular migration and metastasis (1).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationNon-cell-autonomous cancer progression from chromosomal instability
Li, J., Hubisz, M. J., Earlie, E. M., Paez, M. A. D., Hong, C., Varela, A., Lettera, E., Deyell, M., Tavora, B., Havel, J. J., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06464-z · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Self-citationMutational drivers of cancer cell migration and invasion
Novikov, N. M., Zolotareva, S. Y., Gautreau, A. M., & Denisov, E. V. (2020) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01149-0 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
“By increasing inflammation, CIN can also promote cancer metastasis.(9,10) It is worth noting, however, that CIN can influence the invasive and metastatic potential differently, www.”
BackgroundCancer-Cell-Intrinsic cGAS Expression Mediates Tumor Immunogenicity
Schadt, L., Sparano, C., Schweiger, N. A., Siliņa, K., Cecconi, V., Lucchiari, G., Yagita∥, H., Guggisberg, E., Saba, S., Naščáková, Z., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.065 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
“Second, it was shown that chromosomal instability leads to micronuclei, increased amounts of cytoplasmic dsDNA, activation of the cGAS/STING pathway, and increased metastasis (Bakhoum et al., 2018).”
BackgroundCytoplasmic DNA: sources, sensing, and role in aging and disease
Miller, K. N., Victorelli, S. G., Salmonowicz, H., Dasgupta, N., Liu, T., Passos, J. F., & Adams, P. D. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.034 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Targeting the DNA damage response in immuno-oncology: developments and opportunities
Chabanon, R. M., Rouanne, M., Lord, C. J., Soria, J., Pasero, P., & Postel-Vinay, S. C. (2021) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00386-6 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
A pan-cancer compendium of chromosomal instability
Drews, R. M., Hernando, B., Tarabichi, M., Haase, K., Lesluyes, T., Smith, P., Gavarró, L. M., Couturier, D., Liu, L., Schneider, M. P., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04789-9 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Mechanisms of nuclear content loading to exosomes
Yokoi, A., Villar‐Prados, A., Oliphint, P. A., Zhang, J., Song, X., Hoff, P. L. D., Morey, R. E., Liu, J., Roszik, J., Clise-Dwyer, K., et al. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax8849 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
“Chromosomal instability has been observed to correlate with tumor metastasis, and a recent report suggested that this may be mediated by a cytosolic DNA response (34).”
BackgroundTargeting the gut microbiota for cancer therapy
Fernandes, M. R., Aggarwal, P., Costa, R. G. F., Cole, A. M., & Trinchieri, G. (2022) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-022-00513-x · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Trial watch: STING agonists in cancer therapy
Le Naour, J., Zitvogel, L., Galluzzi, L., Vacchelli, E., & Kroemer, G. (2020) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2020.1777624 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Pan-cancer whole-genome comparison of primary and metastatic solid tumours
Martínez-Jiménez, F., Movasati, A., Brunner, S. R., Nguyen, L., Priestley, P., Cuppen, E. P. J. G., & van Hoeck, A. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06054-z · Cited by 290 · see citing works
DNA Sensing in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumor Cells Is Essential for Anti-tumor Immunity
Lu, C., Guan, J., Lu, S., Jin, Q., Rousseau, B., Lu, T., Stephens, D., Zhang, H., Zhu, J., Yang, M., et al. (2021) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.11.006 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Research Advances in How the cGAS-STING Pathway Controls the Cellular Inflammatory Response
Wan, D., Jiang, W., & Hao, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00615 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
“It has also been reported that cGAS recognizing CIN activates non-canonical NF-κB signaling and potentiates cellular metastasis programs (247) .”
BackgroundGrabosch, S., Bulatović, M., Zeng, F., Ma, T., Zhang, L., Ross, M. S., Brozick, J., Fang, Y., Tseng, G. C., Kim, E. S., et al. (2018) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-018-0581-9 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Wu, S., Zhang, Q., Zhang, F., Meng, F., Liu, S., Zhou, R., Wu, Q., Li, X., Shen, L., Huang, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0352-z · Cited by 274 · see citing works
STING inhibitors target the cyclic dinucleotide binding pocket
Hong, Z., Mei, J., Li, C., Bai, G., Maimaiti, M., Hu, H., Yu, W., Sun, L., Zhang, L., Cheng, D., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2105465118 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
“Flag-STING(138-379) Flag-STING(1-341) Flag-STING(del138-340) Flag-STING Flag-STING(138-379) Flag-STING(1-341)”
BackgroundThe impact of mitotic errors on cell proliferation and tumorigenesisPreprint
Levine, M. S., & Holland, A. J. (2018) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.314351.118 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Limited Environmental Serine and Glycine Confer Brain Metastasis Sensitivity to PHGDH Inhibition
Ngo, B., Kim, E., Osorio-Vasquez, V., Doll, S., Bustraan, S., Liang, R. J., Luengo, A., Davidson, S. M., Ali, A., Ferraro, G. B., et al. (2020) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-1228 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
“Intracardiac injection to induce brain metastases was performed as described previously (1).”
MethodSelf-citationMechanisms driving the immunoregulatory function of cancer cells
van Weverwijk, A., & de Visser, K. E. (2023) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-022-00544-4 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Pulido, Á. D. M., Hänggi, K., Celias, D. P., Gardner, A., Li, J., Bittencourt, B. M. B., Mohamed, E. T., Trillo-Tinoco, J., Osunmakinde, O., Peña, R. J., et al. (2021) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.04.019 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Cytosolic DNA sensing by cGAS: regulation, function, and human diseases
Yu, L., & Liu, P. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00554-y · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Jiang, H., Xue, X., Panda, S., Kawale, A. S., Hooy, R. M., Liang, F., Sohn, J., Sung, P., & Gekara, N. O. (2019) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.15252/embj.2019102718 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
“For instance, because cGAS promotes both tumorigenesis (Ahn et al , 2014; Dou et al , 2017; Bakhoum et al , 2018) and anti-tumor immunity (Deng et al , 2014; Woo et al , 2014; Harding et al , 2017; Wang et al , 2017), pinpointing the extent and biological context in which the distinct subcellular…”
Tinganelli, W., & Durante, M. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12103022 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Non-canonical NF-κB Antagonizes STING Sensor-Mediated DNA Sensing in Radiotherapy
Hou, Y., Liang, H. L., Rao, E., Zheng, W., Huang, X., Deng, L., Zhang, Y., Yu, X., Xu, M. M., Mauceri, H. J., et al. (2018) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2018.07.008 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Development of PARP and immune-checkpoint inhibitor combinations
Stewart, R. A., Pilié, P. G., & Yap, T. A. (2018) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2652 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
“Recent studies have demonstrated that chromosomal instability (65) and deficiency in DDR genes, such as ATM (66) or RAD51 (67), leads to accumulation of cytosolic DNA, triggering activation of STING and promoting type I immunity.”
BackgroundCytokinesis defects and cancer
Lens, S. M. A., & Medema, R. H. (2018) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-018-0084-6 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Wang, Q., Bergholz, J. S., Ding, L., Lin, Z., Kabraji, S. K., Hughes, M. E., He, X., Xie, S., Jiang, T., Wang, W., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30568-1 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Cytosolic DNA Sensing in Organismal Tumor Control
Vanpouille-Box, C., Demaria, S., Formenti, S. C., & Galluzzi, L. (2018) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.013 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Shi, X., Wang, X., Yao, W., Shi, D., Shao, X., Lu, Z., Chai, Y., Song, J., Tang, W., & Wang, X. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01885-2 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
“283 A radiolabeled molecule, Lutetium-177 [Lu]-PSMA-617, demonstrates high af fi nity to prostate-speci fi c membrane antigen (PSMA).”
BackgroundHarnessing innate immune pathways for therapeutic advancement in cancer
Hu, A.-K., Sun, L., Lin, H., Liao, Y., Yang, H., & Mao, Y. Q. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01765-9 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
The Impact of the Tumor Microenvironment on Macrophage Polarization in Cancer Metastatic Progression
Wang, H.-G., Yung, M., Ngan, H., Chan, K. K. L., & Chan, D. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22126560 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Du, S.-S., Chen, G.-W., Yang, P., Chen, Y.-X., Hu, Y., Zhao, Q.-Q., Zhang, Y., Liu, R., Zheng, D.-X., Zhou, J., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.162 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
STING inhibits the reactivation of dormant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma
Hu, J. Y., Rivera, F. J. S., Wang, Z., Johnson, G. N., Ho, Y.-J., Ganesh, K., Umeda, S., Gan, S., Mujal, A. M., Delconte, R. B., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05880-5 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Self-citationTrial watch: TLR3 agonists in cancer therapy
Le Naour, J., Galluzzi, L., Zitvogel, L., Kroemer, G., & Vacchelli, E. (2020) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2020.1771143 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Visualizing Engrafted Human Cancer and Therapy Responses in Immunodeficient Zebrafish
Yan, C., Brunson, D. C., Tang, Q., Do, D., Iftimia, N. A., Moore, J. C., Hayes, M. N., Welker, A. M., Garcia, E. G., Dubash, T. D., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.004 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Ma, Z., Li, X., Mao, Y., Chen, W., Huang, Z., Li, G., Yin, J., Liang, X., & Liu, Z. (2022) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2022.11.005 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Ding, R., Li, H., Liu, Y., Ou, W., Zhang, X., Chai, H., Huang, X., Yang, W., & Wang, Q. (2022) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-022-02511-0 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
“, pyroptosis, apoptosis, and lysosomal cell death) via NF-κb signaling [57] or other routes [7, 58].”
BackgroundThe Impact of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage on cGAS-STING-Mediated Immune Responses to Cancer
Storozynsky, Q. T., & Hitt, M. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21228877 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Chromosomal instability accelerates the evolution of resistance to anti-cancer therapies
Lukow, D. A., Sausville, E. L., Suri, P., Chunduri, N. K., Wieland, A., Leu, J., Smith, J. C., Girish, V., Kumar, A. A., Kendall, J., et al. (2021) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2021.07.009 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Mitochondrial DNA-triggered innate immune response: mechanisms and diseases
Hu, M.-M., & Shu, H. (2023) · Cellular and Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41423-023-01086-x · Cited by 247 · see citing works
“Various studies have demonstrated that cGAS not only recognizes a wide range of microbial DNA but also senses mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and cellular nuclear DNA (nDNA) aberrantly localized to the cytosol after infection or under stress or pathological conditions [47 – 54].”
BackgroundCellular Stress Associated with Aneuploidy
Zhu, J., Tsai, H.-J., Gordon, M. R., & Li, R. (2018) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2018.02.002 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Targeting innate immune pathways for cancer immunotherapy
Cao, L. L., & Kagan, J. C. (2023) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2023.07.018 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
An, X., Zhu, Y., Zheng, T., Wang, G., Zhang, M., Li, J., Ji, H., Li, S., Yang, S., Xu, D., et al. (2019) · Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2018.11.003 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
“Bakhoum et al.21 found that the genomic instability of the tumor cells results in the activation of STING signaling in response to cytosolic DNA, and the activation of STING signaling activates downstream noncanonical nuclear factor kB (NFkB) signaling, which then promotes the metastasis of cancer cells.”
BackgroundRadiotherapy as a tool to elicit clinically actionable signalling pathways in cancer
Petroni, G., Cantley, L. C., Santambrogio, L., Formenti, S. C., & Galluzzi, L. (2021) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-021-00579-w · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationBioactive DNA from extracellular vesicles and particles
Malkin, E. Z., & Bratman, S. V. (2020) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-020-02803-4 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
“Speculation surrounding the loading of DNA into S-EVs has focused largely on micronuclei, small buddings of the nucleus resulting from DNA damage response pathways 47,48 .”
Nuclear Deformation Causes DNA Damage by Increasing Replication Stress
Shah, P., Hobson, C. M., Cheng, S., Colville, M. J., Paszek, M. J., Superfine, R., & Lammerding, J. (2020) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.037 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Self-citationThe diverse consequences of aneuploidy
Chunduri, N. K., & Štorchová, Z. (2018) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-018-0243-8 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bakhoum, S. F., Ngo, B., Laughney, A. M., Cavallo, J.-A., Murphy, C. J., Ly, P., Shah, P., Sriram, R. K., Watkins, T. B. K., Taunk, N. K., Duran, M., Pauli, C., Shaw, C., Chadalavada, K., Rajasekhar, V. K., Genovese, G., Venkatesan, S., Birkbak, N. J., McGranahan, N., Lundquist, M., LaPlant, Q., Healey, J. H., Elemento, O., Chung, C. H., Lee, N. Y., Imielenski, M., Nanjangud, G., Pe’er, D., Cleveland, D. W., Powell, S. N., Lammerding, J., Swanton, C., & Cantley, L. C.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- The Francis Crick Institute (GB)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Broad Institute (US)
- University College London (GB)
- Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
- ORCID
- Bakhoum, Samuel F.
- Ngo, Bryan
- Laughney, Ashley M.
- Murphy, Charles J.
- Ly, Peter
- Shah, Pragya
- Watkins, Thomas B. K.
- Taunk, Neil K.
- Pauli, Chantal
- Chadalavada, Kalyani
- Rajasekhar, Vinagolu K.
- Genovese, Giulio
- Venkatesan, Subramanian
- Birkbak, Nicolai J.
- McGranahan, Nicholas
- Lundquist, Mark
- LaPlant, Quincey
- Healey, John H.
- Elemento, Olivier
- Chung, Christine H.
- Lee, Nancy Y.
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2018-01-17
- Volume
- 553
- Issue
- 7689
- Pages
- 467-472
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC5785464
- OpenAlex
- W2783667606
- Cited by
- 1,638
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 174 · 2025: 210 · 2024: 223 · 2023: 225 · 2022: 190 · 2021: 203 · 2020: 149 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 49.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Keywords
- chromosomal instability, metastasis, cytosolic DNA sensing, cGAS-STING pathway, micronuclei, chromosome segregation errors, NF-κB signaling, innate immunity
- MeSH terms
- STING Protein, Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate-Adenosine Monophosphate Synthase, Animals, Brain Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-19.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-19.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review