Cited by 97Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

LBA2_PR: Osimertinib (AZD9291) in pre-treated pts with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC: updated Phase 1 (P1) and pooled Phase 2 (P2) results

Open access
Yang, J., Ramalingam, S.S., Jänne, P.A., Cantarini, M., Mitsudomi, T.·2016·Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1556-0864(16)30325-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Osimertinib is an oral irreversible EGFR-TKI selective for EGFR and T790M resistance mutations with CNS activity.

    “Osimertinib is an oral, irreversible EGFR-TKI that is selective for both EGFR and T790M resistance mutations with activity in the central nervous system (CNS).19–21”
  • The AURA3 outcomes with osimertinib (median PFS 10.1 months, response rate 71%) were in line with results from phase 1/2 AURA and AURA2 studies.

    “Among patients receiving osimertinib, the AURA3 outcomes (median progression-free survival duration of 10.1 months and response rate of 71%) were in line with results of the phase 1/2 AURA and AURA2 studies.22,23”
  • The safety profile for osimertinib was consistent with that reported previously and differed from that in the platinum-pemetrexed group.

    “In AURA3, the safety profile for osimertinib was consistent with that reported previously and differed from that in the platinum–pemetrexed group.23”
  • In the BLOOM study, 20 patients with leptomeningeal metastases from EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC treated with osimertinib 160 mg daily showed preliminary radiologic improvement in 7 patients.

    “In the BLOOM study (), in which 20 patients with leptomeningeal metastases from EGFR mutation–positive non–small-cell lung cancer were treated with osimertinib (at a dose of 160 mg once daily), preliminary results showed radiologic improvement in 7 patients.21”
  • In a pooled analysis of two phase 2 studies of osimertinib 80 mg daily in 411 T790M-positive NSCLC patients, response rate was 66% by blinded independent central review and median PFS was 11.0 months.

    “These findings were confirmed in a pooled analysis of two subsequent phase 2 studies of osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) in 411 patients with T790M-positive non–small-cell lung cancer, in which the response rate was 66% on blinded independent central review and the median duration of progression-free survival was 11.0 months.23”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, J., Ramalingam, S. S., Jänne, P. A., Cantarini, M., & Mitsudomi, T.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
  • Emory University (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Kindai University (JP)
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
S152-S153
ISSN
1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2336745060
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 19
FWCI
25.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Thoracic Oncology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
osimertinib, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, T790M mutation, advanced non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, first-line therapy, pooled analysis, oral targeted therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review