New Developments in Econometric Methods for Labor Market Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Econometric practice in labor economics has changed over the past 10 years as probit, logit, hazard methods, instrumental variables, and fixed effects models have grown in use and selection bias methods have declined in use. To a large degree these trends reflect an increasing preference for methods which are less restrictive, more robust, and freer in functional form than older methods, although not all trends are consistent with this view. The trends also reflect a tension between structural and reduced-form estimation that has not yet been resolved. A major point of the review is that this trend in labor economic practice has paralleled a trend in econometrics involving the use of flexible forms and semi-parametric and non-parametric methods but has not incorporated the lessons from that field. © 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the late 1960s and 1970s, new computing methods and data sources reshaped economics and made it a more applied field.
“In the late 1960s and 1970s, new computing methods and data sources reshaped economics and made it a more applied field (Moffitt 1999).”
From Technology and Big Data Are Changing Economics: Mining Text to Track Methods (2020) · cites this paper as Moffitt 1999
Cites
Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments
Staiger, D., & Stock, J. (1994) · doi:10.3386/t0151 · Cited by 5,302 · see citing works
Identification and estimation of local average treatment effects
Imbens, G. W., & Angrist, J. D. (1994) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951620 · Cited by 4,101 · see citing works
Shadow Prices, Market Wages, and Labor Supply
Heckman, J. (1974) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913937 · Cited by 1,852 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Technology and Big Data Are Changing Economics: Mining Text to Track Methods
Currie, J., Kleven, H., & Zwiers, E. (2020) · AEA Papers and Proceedings · doi:10.1257/pandp.20201058 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moffitt, R.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Robert Moffitt
- ORCID
- Robert Moffitt
- Venue
- Handbook of Labor Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 1367-1397
- ISSN
- 1573-4463 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140708130
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 15.85
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Handbook of labour economics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
- Keywords
- labor market analysis, econometric methods, hazard models, instrumental variables, fixed effects model, selection bias, semiparametric models, non-parametric methods, flexible functional forms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review