Cited by 5,302Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisMonetary Policy and Economic Impact

Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments

Open access
Staiger, Douglas, Stock, James·1994·National Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract

This paper develops asymptotic distribution theory for instrumental variable regression when the partial correlation between the instruments and a single included endogenous variable is weak, here modeled as local to zero. Asymptotic representations are provided for various instrumental variable statistics, including the two-stage least squares (TSLS) and limited information maximum- likelihood (LIML) estimators and their t-statistics. The asymptotic distributions are found to provide good approximations to sampling distributions with just 20 observations per instrument. Even in large samples, TSLS can be badly biased, but LIML is, in many cases, approximately median unbiased. The theory suggests concrete quantitative guidelines for applied work. These guidelines help to interpret Angrist and Krueger's (1991) estimates of the returns to education: whereas TSLS estimates with many instruments approach the OLS estimate of 6%, the more reliable LIML and TSLS estimates with fewer instruments fall between 8% and 10%, with a typical confidence interval of (6%, 14%).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3386/t0151

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Controlling for a covariate that is influenced by the exposure or the outcome could bias the MR effect estimate.

    “In either of these situations, controlling for such a covariate could bias the MR effect estimate.55–57”

    From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [57]

  • Selection bias can arise in MR studies if an individual's exposure and outcome values affect their participation.

    “Another type of bias that can arise in MR studies that cannot be easily corrected for is selection bias64 In an MR study, an example of selection bias would be if an individual’s exposure and outcome values affected their participation.57”

    From Mendelian randomization (2022) · cites this paper as [57]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staiger, D., & Stock, J.
Venue
National Bureau of Economic Research
Published
1994-01
OpenAlex
W3122531453
Cited by
5,302
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 242 · 2020: 254 · 2019: 246 · 2018: 248 · 2017: 286 · 2016: 328 · 2015: 343 · 2014: 345 · 2013: 336 · 2012: 337
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Keywords
weak instruments, instrumental variable regression, asymptotic distribution, two-stage least squares, limited information maximum likelihood, endogeneity, returns to education, t-statistic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review