The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chapter 113 Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another relevant difference is that women are typically found to be more risk-averse than men (for reviews of the literature, see Byrnes et al., 1999; Croson & Gneezy, 2009; Eckel & Grossman, 2008).”
From Talking the talk, not walking the walk: The coevolution of overconfidence and loss aversion (2026) · cites this paper as Eckel & Grossman, 2008
Citations
Cites
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621794 · Cited by 10,127
Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802762024700 · Cited by 5,893
A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors
Weber, E. U., Blais, A., & Betz, N. E. (2002) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.414 · Cited by 2,936
Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk
Starmer, C. (2000) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.38.2.332 · Cited by 1,885
Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01740.x · Cited by 1,777
Gender, Race, and Perception of Environmental Health Risks
Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. K. (1994) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x · Cited by 1,537
Wilson, J. Q., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1985) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 1,486
Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: An experimental analysis
Powell, M., & Ansic, D. (1997) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0167-4870(97)00026-3 · Cited by 1,369
Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2002) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(02)00097-1 · Cited by 1,014
Self-citationGender Differences in the Allocation of Assets in Retirement Savings Plans
Sunden, A. E., & Surette, B. J. (1998) · American Economic Review · Cited by 990
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- McStay, 1983, Male–female differences in concern for environmental quality, International Journal of Women's Studies, 6, 291
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gender Differences in Preferences
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448 · Cited by 5,694
INDIVIDUAL RISK ATTITUDES: MEASUREMENT, DETERMINANTS, AND BEHAVIORAL CONSEQUENCES
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x · Cited by 3,982
Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Does Gender Matter?
Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452 · Cited by 1,552
Niederle, M., & Lise Vesterlund, C. (2011) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125122 · Cited by 805
Ge, W., Matsumoto, D. A., & Zhang, J. L. (2011) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01097.x · Cited by 653
Metadata
- Authors
- Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
- St. Cloud State University (US)
- Venue
- Handbook of Experimental Economics Results
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 1061-1073
- ISSN
- 1574-0722 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W20182383
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 22.47
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Handbook of experimental economics results (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Keywords
- risk aversion, gender differences, expected utility maximization, decision making under risk, framing effects, investment decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
