CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strong Evidence for Gender Differences in Risk Taking

Charness, Gary, Gneezy, Uri·2012·Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
DOI 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Bellemare, 2005, Myopic loss aversion: information feedback vs. investment flexibility, Economics Letters, 87, 291, 10.1016/j.econlet.2004.12.011 · DOI
  2. Bernasek, 2001, Gender, risk and retirement, Journal of Economic Issues, 35, 345, 10.1080/00213624.2001.11506368 · DOI
  3. Charness, 2009, An experimental test of inequality and risk-sharing arrangements, Economic Journal, 119, 796, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02248.x · DOI
  4. Charness, 2010, Portfolio choice and risk attitudes: an experiment, Economic Inquiry, 48, 133, 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00219.x · DOI
  5. Croson, 2009, Gender difference in preferences, Journal of Economic Literature, 47, 448, 10.1257/jel.47.2.448 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Dekel, 1999, On the evolution of attitudes towards risk in winner-take-all games, Journal of Economic Theory, 87, 125, 10.1006/jeth.1999.2537 · DOI
  7. Eckel, 2002, Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk, Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 281, 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00097-1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Eckel, C., Grossman, P. Forecasting risk attitudes: an experimental study of actual and forecast risk attitudes of women and men. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, in press.
  9. Eckel, 2008, Men, women and risk aversion: experimental evidence, vol. 1, 1061
  10. Ertac, 2012, Deciding to decide: gender, leadership and risk-taking in groups, Journal of Economic Behavior, 83, 50, 10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.009 · DOI
  11. Finucane, 2000, Gender, race, and perceived risk: the ‘white male’ effect, Health, Risk and Society, 2, 159, 10.1080/713670162 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gneezy, 2009, Gender differences in competition: evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society, Econometrica, 77, 1637, 10.3982/ECTA6690 · DOI
  13. Gong, B. and Yang, C.-L., 2011. Gender differences in risk attitudes: field experiments on the Matrilineal Mosuo and the Patriarchal Yi. Journal of Economic Behavior, in press · DOI
  14. Haigh, 2005, Do professional traders exhibit myopic loss aversion? an experimental analysis, Journal of Finance, 60, 523, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00737.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Jianakoplos, 1998, Are women more risk-averse?, Economic Inquiry, 36, 620, 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1998.tb01740.x · DOI
  16. Powell, 1997, Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: an experimental analysis, Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 605, 10.1016/S0167-4870(97)00026-3 · DOI
  17. Schubert, 1999, Financial decision-making: are women really more risk averse?, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 89, 381, 10.1257/aer.89.2.381 · DOI
  18. Sundén, 1998, Gender differences in the allocation of assets in retirement savings plans, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 88, 207
  19. Tooby, 1990, On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual: the role of genetics and adaptation, Journal of Personality, 58, 17, 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00907.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Charness, G., & Gneezy, U.
Venue
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
50-58
ISSN
0167-2681
DOI
10.1016/j.jebo.2011.06.007
Cited by
1,357
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review