Cited by 42Cancer survivorship and careOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Determinants of quality of life in ovarian cancer survivors: a pilot study

Open access
Teng, Flora F., Kalloger, Steve E., Brotto, Lori, McAlpine, Jessica N.·2014·Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Abstract

Objective Ovarian cancer treatments and outcomes vary substantially, yielding a diverse group of survivors. Few data exist on quality of life (QoL) concerns and the foremost needs of these patients. Our goal was to conduct a pilot study to determine the QoL needs of ovarian cancer survivors to establish priorities for future interventions.Methods In this cross-sectional study, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and OV28) QoL questionnaires and one investigator-derived questionnaire were administered in an outpatient setting. Clinical parameters were abstracted and tested for associations with QoL measures.Results A total of 102 women consented to participate and completed all components. Their mean age was 58 years (range 29 to 85), with 80% having epithelial ovarian carcinoma and 66% high-grade serous carcinoma. Women with stage I (28%), II (15%), III (47%), and IV (10%) lesions were represented in the primary treatment (25%), surveillance (46%), recurrent (23%), and palliative (7%) phases of the survivorship continuum. Fifty-one percent characterized their disease burden as "quite a bit" or "very much," and this did not vary by histology or diagnoses. Global QoL did not vary by clinico-pathologic parameters. Cardiovascular and respiratory comorbidities were associated with EORTC scores in physical functioning (P=0.027 for cardiovascular and P=0.041 for respiratory), global QoL (P=0.03 for cardiovascular and P=0.039 for respiratory), and sexual health (P=0.025 for cardiovascular). Task completion/memory/concentration, anxiety, and fatigue were the distress categories given highest priority by respondents.Conclusion In women with ovarian cancer, clinical factors such as age, stage, and histology did not have a significant impact on QoL. Psychosocial factors have a larger impact on global QoL than physical symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30513-2

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ovarian cancer survivors often have long-term symptoms such as anxiety, depression, sleep problems, fatigue, physical symptoms, reduced health-related quality of life, and a poor outlook.

    “Ovarian cancer (OC) survivors commonly experience chronic symptoms including anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, fatigue, physical symptoms, poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and a generally poor prognosis.”

    From Living Well: Protocol for a web-based program to improve quality of life in rural and urban ovarian cancer survivors (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results (page unavailable) report anxiety, insomnia, fatigue, pain and other physical symptoms as quality-of-life concerns among the ovarian cancer survivors studied. They do not establish that these symptoms are chronic or that depression is a common symptom; depression appears only as a possible pre-existing diagnosis in Materials and Methods. The introduction describes prognoses as ranging widely, rather than survivors having a generally poor prognosis. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teng, F. F., Kalloger, S. E., Brotto, L., & McAlpine, J. N.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
708-715
ISSN
1701-2163 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2189330448
Cited by
42
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ovarian Cancer Canada
  • BC Cancer Agency
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
ovarian cancer survivors, quality of life, EORTC QLQ-C30, high-grade serous carcinoma, epithelial ovarian cancer, comorbidities, physical function, sexual health, fatigue, anxiety, psychosocial factors, patient needs
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Pilot Projects, Quality of Life, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review