Cited by 83Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Laparoscopy and Reported Pain among Patients with Endometriosis

Jarrell, John, Mohindra, Ruchi, Ross, Sue, Taenzer, Paul, Brant, Rollin·2005·Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Abstract

Objective To compare the effectiveness of sharp excision of endometriosis with sham surgical excision in alleviating endometriosis-associated pain for up to 1 year following surgery. Methods Patients requiring a laparoscopy for severe pelvic pain were eligible. If endometriosis was visually identified at laparoscopy, a biopsy of a representative lesion was taken. The women were then randomized either to have all remaining endometriosis excised with laparoscopic scissors (the excision group) or to have no further surgical treatment (the control group). Patients were asked to complete daily pain scales for 1 month preoperatively and quarterly for 1 year postoperatively. Subjects were blinded to their treatment allocation for 1 year. Results Twenty-nine women underwent laparoscopy and biopsy and were randomized to have excision or no treatment of endometriosis. The excision and control groups were similar in age, parity, and revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine stage of disease. Sixteen women completed the full year of follow-up: 9 in the excision group, and 7 in the control group. Overall, recorded pain was significantly reduced at 1 year (P < 0.05), with no significant difference between the excision and control groups. Conclusion Laparoscopy with diagnostic biopsy alone is associated with a significant reduction in pain for up to 1 year postoperatively. Although the study lacked sufficient statistical power to exclude an effect of excision, pain relief in each group was similar. These results indicate a potential benefit of sham surgical procedures in assessing novel surgical interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30531-x

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After surgery for symptomatic endometriosis, about 20% of patients do not obtain relief, and those who fail are more likely to have minimal or mild endometriosis.

    “Studies on the effectiveness of surgery for symptomatic endometriosis illustrate that 20% of patients do not have relief after surgery and those who fail are more likely to have minimal or mild endometriosis (Sutton et al., 1994;Abbott et al., 2004;Jarrell et al., 2005).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jarrell, J., Mohindra, R., Ross, S., Taenzer, P., & Brant, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
  • Calgary Health Region (CA)
Venue
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-05
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
477-485
ISSN
1701-2163 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2340340272
Cited by
83
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, laparoscopy, endometriosis excision, sham surgery, pelvic pain, analgesia, biopsy diagnosis, surgical excision, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Pain Measurement, Laparoscopy, Placebos, Severity of Illness Index, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review