Cited by 31Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsMaternal and fetal healthcarePregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Risk of fetal death associated with maternal drug dependence and placental abruption: a population-based study

McDonald, Sarah D., Vermeulen, Marian J., Ray, Joel G.·2007·Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

Abstract

Objective Substance use in pregnancy is associated with placental abruption, but the risk of fetal death independent of abruption remains undetermined. Our objective was to examine the effect of maternal drug dependence on placental abruption and on fetal death in association with abruption and independent of it.Methods To examine placental abruption and fetal death, we performed a retrospective population-based study of 1 854 463 consecutive deliveries of liveborn and stillborn infants occurring between January 1, 1995 and March 31, 2001, using the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database.Results Maternal drug dependence was associated with a tripling of the risk of placental abruption in singleton pregnancies (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.1; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 2.6-3.7), but not in multiple gestations (adjusted OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.12-6.4). Maternal drug dependence was associated with an increased risk of fetal death independent of abruption (adjusted OR 1.6: 95% CI 1.1-2.2) in singleton pregnancies, but not in multiples. Risk of fetal death was increased with placental abruption in both singleton and multiple gestations, even after controlling for drug dependence (adjusted OR 11.4 in singleton pregnancy; 95% CI 10.6-12.2, and 3.4 in multiple pregnancy; 95% CI 2.4-4.9).Conclusion Maternal drug use is associated with an increased risk of intrauterine fetal death independent of placental abruption. In singleton pregnancies, maternal drug dependence is associated with an increased risk of placental abruption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32511-7

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDonald, S. D., Vermeulen, M. J., & Ray, J. G.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Venue
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
556-559
ISSN
1701-2163 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146446472
Cited by
31
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
maternal drug dependence, placental abruption, fetal death, stillbirth, substance use in pregnancy, singleton pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, pregnancy outcomes
MeSH terms
Abruptio Placentae, Adult, Female, Fetal Death, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review