The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Network pharmacology approaches for research of Traditional Chinese Medicines
Abstract
Pharmacodynamics material basis and effective mechanisms are the two main issues to decipher the mechnisms of action of Traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) for the treatment of diseases. TCMs, in "multi-component, multi-target, multi-pathway" paradigm, show satisfactory clinical results in complex diseases. New ideas and methods are urgently needed to explain the complex interactions between TCMs and diseases. Network pharmacology (NP) provides a novel paradigm to uncover and visualize the underlying interaction networks of TCMs against multifactorial diseases. The development and application of NP has promoted the safety, efficacy, and mechanism investigations of TCMs, which then reinforces the credibility and popularity of TCMs. The current organ-centricity of medicine and the "one disease-one target-one drug" dogma obstruct the understanding of complex diseases and the development of effective drugs. Therefore, more attentions should be paid to shift from "phenotype and symptom" to "endotype and cause" in understanding and redefining current diseases. In the past two decades, with the advent of advanced and intelligent technologies (such as metabolomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, single-cell omics, and artificial intelligence), NP has been improved and deeply implemented, and presented its great value and potential as the next drug-discovery paradigm. NP is developed to cure causal mechanisms instead of treating symptoms. This review briefly summarizes the recent research progress on NP application in TCMs for efficacy research, mechanism elucidation, target prediction, safety evaluation, drug repurposing, and drug design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Szklarczyk, D., Gable, A. L., Lyon, D., Junge, A., Wyder, S., Huerta-Cepas, J., Simonovic, M., Doncheva, N. T., Morris, J. H., Bork, P., et al. (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1131 · Cited by 17,749
The GeneCards suite: from gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses
Stelzer, G., Rosen, N., Plaschkes, I., Zimmerman, S., Twik, M., Fishilevich, S., Stein, T. I., Nudel, R., Lieder, I., Mazor, Y., et al. (2016) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.5 · Cited by 5,550
TCMSP: a database of systems pharmacology for drug discovery from herbal medicines
Ru, J., Li, P., Wang, J., Zhou, W., Li, B., Huang, C., Li, P., Guo, Z., Tao, W., Yang, Y., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/1758-2946-6-13 · Cited by 5,038
Network pharmacology: the next paradigm in drug discovery
Hopkins, A. L. (2008) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.118 · Cited by 4,622
Amberger, J. S., Bocchini, C. A., Schiettecatte, F., Scott, A. F., & Hamosh, A. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1205 · Cited by 2,691
Piñero, J., Bravo, À., Queralt-Rosinach, N., Gutiérrez-Sacristán, A., Deu-Pons, J., Centeno, E., García-García, J., Sanz, F., & Furlong, L. I. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkw943 · Cited by 2,680
Oughtred, R., Rust, J., Chang, C., Breitkreutz, B., Stark, C., Willems, A., Boucher, L., Leung, G., Kolas, N., Zhang, F., et al. (2021) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3978 · Cited by 1,858
Xenarios, I. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.303 · Cited by 1,741
STITCH 5: augmenting protein–chemical interaction networks with tissue and affinity data
Szklarczyk, D., Santos, A., von Mering, C., Jensen, L. J., Bork, P., & Kuhn, M. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1277 · Cited by 1,687
Wang, X., Shen, Y., Wang, S., Li, S., Zhang, W., Liu, X., Lai, L., Pei, J., & Li, H. (2017) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkx374 · Cited by 1,588
Metadata
- Authors
- LI, X., LIU, Z., LIAO, J., CHEN, Q., LU, X., & FAN, X.
- Venue
- Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 323-332
- ISSN
- 1672-3651 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-5364
- OpenAlex
- W4378364316
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 40.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network pharmacology approaches for research of Traditional Chinese Medicines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1875-5364(23)60429-7
- The paper
- LI, X., LIU, Z., LIAO, J., CHEN, Q., LU, X., & FAN, X. (2023). Network pharmacology approaches for research of Traditional Chinese Medicines. Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1875-5364(23)60429-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.