Cited by 2,691Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

OMIM.org: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM®), an online catalog of human genes and genetic disorders

Open access
Amberger, Joanna S., Bocchini, Carol A., Schiettecatte, François, Scott, Alan F., Hamosh, Ada·2015·Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM(®), is a comprehensive, authoritative and timely research resource of curated descriptions of human genes and phenotypes and the relationships between them. The new official website for OMIM, OMIM.org (http://omim.org), was launched in January 2011. OMIM is based on the published peer-reviewed biomedical literature and is used by overlapping and diverse communities of clinicians, molecular biologists and genome scientists, as well as by students and teachers of these disciplines. Genes and phenotypes are described in separate entries and are given unique, stable six-digit identifiers (MIM numbers). OMIM entries have a structured free-text format that provides the flexibility necessary to describe the complex and nuanced relationships between genes and genetic phenotypes in an efficient manner. OMIM also has a derivative table of genes and genetic phenotypes, the Morbid Map. OMIM.org has enhanced search capabilities such as genome coordinate searching and thesaurus-enhanced search term options. Phenotypic series have been created to facilitate viewing genetic heterogeneity of phenotypes. Clinical synopsis features are enhanced with UMLS, Human Phenotype Ontology and Elements of Morphology terms and image links. All OMIM data are available for FTP download and through an API. MIMmatch is a novel outreach feature to disseminate updates and encourage collaboration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gku1205

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For disease phenotypes in GeneTuring's gene disease association questions, we manually identified genes associated with that phenotype according to DisGeNet that are not associated according to OMIM.

    “Specifically, for disease phenotypes in GeneTuring's gene disease association questions, we manually identified genes associated with that phenotype according to DisGeNet [42] that are not associated according to OMIM [1].”
  • XGBoost was utilized to identify novel genes associated with Alzheimer's disease.

    “In this case, XGBoost, a form of extreme gradient boosting (67), was utilized to identify novel genes associated with Alzheimer's disease (68).”

    From Artificial Intelligence for Drug Discovery: Are We There Yet? (2024) · cites this paper as [67]

    The 'Representation of Gene–Phenotype Relationships' section (page unavailable) describes how OMIM records and evaluates gene–phenotype associations, not an XGBoost analysis. Searches for XGBoost and for Alzheimer's disease gene identification found no passage in our copy supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clinical translation of rare disease technologies has benefited from information resources including open databases of genes, clinically interpreted variants, and patient records.

    “Clinical translation of these technologies has benefited from a series of information resources, including open databases of genes associated with rare disorders (for example, OMIM and ORPHANET)21, clinically interpreted variants (for example, ClinVar and ClinGen)22,23 and patient records (for example, DECIPHER and MyGene2 (https://mygene2.org/MyGene2))17.”

    From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amberger, J. S., Bocchini, C. A., Schiettecatte, F., Scott, A. F., & Hamosh, A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Amberger, Joanna S.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2014-11-26
Volume
43
Issue
D1
Pages
D789-D798
ISSN
  • 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-4962
OpenAlex
W2162151166
Cited by
2,691
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 316 · 2025: 343 · 2024: 336 · 2023: 318 · 2022: 322 · 2021: 215 · 2020: 177 · 2019: 166 · 2018: 163 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 117 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 5
FWCI
45.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Human Genome Research Institute (U41HG006627)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
OMIM, genetic disorders, genotype-phenotype correlation, genetic heterogeneity, UMLS, Human Phenotype Ontology
MeSH terms
Genes, Humans, Phenotype, Internet, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review