Cited by 3Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchBone health and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

P-240: Real-world assessment of treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with lenalidomide-refractory relapsed multiple myeloma from the SEER-Medicare database

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2152-2650(22)00570-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dhakal, B., Einsele, H., Potluri, R., Schecter, J., Deraedt, W., Lendvai, N., Slaughter, A., Lonardi, C., Nair, S., He, J., Voelker, J., Cost, P., Valluri, S., Yalniz, F., Pacaud, L., & Yong, K.
Venue
Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
22
Pages
S167
ISSN
2152-2650 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293107848
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
Keywords
relapsed multiple myeloma, lenalidomide-refractory disease, treatment patterns, treatment outcomes, SEER-Medicare, real-world evidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review