The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use on Continuance Intention to Use E-Government
Open accessAbstract
E-government can offer improved quality of information supply and fewer administrative burdens. Despite significant benefits in e-government systems, the extent to which citizens have been able to assimilate these systems is still unclear. This study analyzed the relationships between predictor's variable (perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use) and criterion variable which is continuance intention to use e-government. A total of 543 government servant who taught in Malaysian public schools completed the questionnaire and became the participants of this study. To answer the research questions, multiple regression analysis was applied. The results indicate that perceived usefulness (β = 0.65, p < 0.01) and perceived ease of use (β = 0.14, p < 0.05) were positively related to continuance intention to use e-government and able to explain a total of 56% variance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model1
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250921 · Cited by 8,767
Understanding Web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value
Chiu, C.-M., & Wang, E. T. G. (2008) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.02.003 · Cited by 869
Cited by
Cashless Transactions: A Study on Intention and Adoption of e-Wallets
Yang, M., Mamun, A. A., Mohiuddin, M., Nawi, N. C., & Zainol, N. R. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13020831 · Cited by 326
“The experience of using the e-wallet app was reported as easy to use by many consumers [26].”
MethodTiwari, C. K., Bhat, M. A., Khan, S. T., Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. A. I. (2024) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-04-2023-0061 · Cited by 315
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamid, A. A., Razak, F. Z. A., Bakar, A. A., & Abdullah, W. S. W.
- Venue
- Procedia Economics and Finance
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 644-649
- ISSN
- 2212-5671 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2292696949
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 94.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
