Cited by 16Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingMedical Imaging and Pathology Studies

Deep learning and the evaluation of pulmonary fibrosis

Open access
Levin, David L·2018·The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30371-0

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Walsh algorithm study highlighted limitations including limited number of scans in the training set and potential bias from the training set being labelled by one specialist only.

    “However, this study also highlighted some limitations of this specific algorithm, such as the limited number of scans in the training set, and the potential bias introduced by the fact that the training set was labelled by one specialist only (Levin, 2018).”

    From Pulmonary fibrosis: Emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies (2023) · cites this paper as Levin, 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levin, D. L.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Levin, David L
Venue
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
803-805
ISSN
2213-2600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891082731
Cited by
16
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies
Keywords
pulmonary fibrosis, interstitial lung disease, deep learning, computed tomography, honeycombing, diagnostic criteria
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review