Cited by 36Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNosocomial Infections in ICUEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Continued enteral nutrition until extubation compared with fasting before extubation in patients in the intensive care unit: an open-label, cluster-randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial

Open access
Landais, Mickaël, Nay, Mai-Anh, Auchabie, Johann, Hubert, Noemie, Frerou, Aurélien, Yehia, Aihem, Mercat, Alain, Jonas, Maud +76 more·2023·The Lancet Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

Background Fasting is frequently imposed before extubation in patients in intensive care units, with the aim to reduce risk of aspiration. This unevaluated practice might delay extubation, increase workload, and reduce caloric intake. We aimed to compare continued enteral nutrition until extubation with fasting before extubation in patients in the intensive care unit. Methods We conducted an open-label, cluster-randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial in 22 intensive care units in France. Patients aged 18 years or older were eligible for enrolment if they had received invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h in the intensive care unit and received prepyloric enteral nutrition for at least 24 h at the time of extubation decision. Centres were randomly assigned (1:1) to continued enteral nutrition until extubation or 6-h fasting with concomitant gastric suctioning before extubation, to be applied for all patients within the unit. Masking was not possible because of the nature of the trial. The primary outcome was extubation failure (composite criteria of reintubation or death) within 7 days after extubation, assessed in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. The non-inferiority margin was set at 10%. Pneumonia within 14 days of extubation was a key secondary endpoint. This trial is now complete and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03335345. Findings Between April 1, 2018, and Oct 31, 2019, 7056 patients receiving enteral nutrition and mechanical ventilation were admitted to the intensive care units and 4198 were assessed for eligibility. 1130 patients were enrolled and included in the intention-to-treat population and 1008 were included in the per-protocol population. In the intention-to-treat population, extubation failure occurred in 106 (17·2%) of 617 patients assigned to receive continued enteral nutrition until extubation versus 90 (17·5%) of 513 assigned to fasting, meeting the a priori defined non-inferiority criterion (absolute difference -0·4%, 95% CI -5·2 to 4·5). In the per-protocol population, extubation failure occurred in 101 (17·0%) of 595 patients assigned to receive continued enteral nutrition versus 74 (17·9%) of 413 assigned to fasting (absolute difference -0·9%, 95% CI -5·6 to 3·7). Pneumonia within 14 days of extubation occurred in ten (1·6%) patients assigned to receive continued enteral nutrition and 13 (2·5%) assigned to fasting (rate ratio 0·77, 95% CI 0·22 to 2·69). Interpretation Continued enteral nutrition until extubation in critically ill patients in the intensive care unit was non-inferior to a 6-h fasting maximum gastric vacuity strategy comprising continuous gastric tube suctioning, in terms of extubation failure within 7 days (a patient-centred outcome), and thus represents a potential alternative in this population. Funding French Ministry of Health. Translation For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-2600(22)00413-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one trial including 30% of patients with heart failure and 2% with cardiogenic shock, enteral nutrition continuation during mechanical ventilation liberation was associated with shorter extubation times, shorter mechanical ventilation duration, better achievement of caloric goals, lower mortality, and less hypoglycemia without differences in aspiration events compared with enteral nutrition.

    “1 trial including 30% of patients with HF and 2% with CS demonstrated that EN continuation during MV liberation was associated with shorter extubation times, shorter MV duration, better achievement of caloric goals, lower mortality, and less hypoglycemia without differences in aspiration events compared with EN interruption.155”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landais, M., Nay, M.-A., Auchabie, J., Hubert, N., Frerou, A., Yehia, A., Mercat, A., Jonas, M., Martino, F., Moriconi, M., Courte, A., Robert-Edan, V., Conia, A., Bavozet, F., Egreteau, P.-Y., Bruel, C., Renault, A., Huet, O., Feller, M., Chudeau, N., Ferrandiere, M., Rebion, A., Robert, A., Giraudeau, B., Reignier, J., Thille, A. W., Tavernier, E., Ehrmann, S., MORTAZA, S., DEMISELLE, J., SASSI, T., DELALE, C., GROUILLE, J., DE TINTENIAC, A., GESLAIN, M., FLOCH, H., BAILLY, P., BODENES, L., PRAT, G., KALFON, P., BADRE, G., JOURDAIN, C., MAZZONI, T., LE MEUR, A., FAYOLLE, P. M., HERON, A., MAILLET, O., LEDOUX, N., ROLLE, A., RICHARD, R., VALETTE, M., AZAIS, M.-A., POUPLET, C., BACHOUMAS, K., CALLAHAN, J. C., GUITTON, C., DARREAU, C., LEFEVRE, M., LELOUP, G., BERTEL, M., DAUVERGNE, J., PACAUD, L., LAKHAL, K., MARTIN, M., GARRET, C., LASCARROU, J.-B., BOULAIN, T., MATHONNET, A., MULLER, G., PHILIPPART, F., TRAN, M., FOURNIER, J., FRAT, J.-P., COUDROY, R., CHATELLIER, D., HALLEY, G., GACOUIN, A., HOFF, J., VASTAL, S., TELLIER, A.-C., BARBAZ, M., SALMON GANDONNIERE, C., MERCIER, E., & DARWICHE, W.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier du Mans (FR)
  • Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans (FR)
  • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Départemental Vendée (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pointe-à-Pitre (GP)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Venue
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
319-328
ISSN
2213-2600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4317677458
Cited by
36
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Respiratory Medicine (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Ministère des Affaires Sociales et de la Santé
  • Ministry of Health and Solidarity (API16/A/063)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
enteral nutrition, extubation, mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit, extubation failure, reintubation, aspiration, non-inferiority, pneumonia, critically ill patients
MeSH terms
Enteral Nutrition, Fasting, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Respiration, Artificial, Treatment Outcome, Airway Extubation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review