Cited by 11Hormonal Regulation and HypertensionRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Fluid retention, aldosterone excess, and treatment of resistant hypertension

Open access
Calhoun, David A·2018·The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology

Abstract

In 2015, Bryan Williams and colleagues1Williams B MacDonald TM Morant S et al.Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial.Lancet. 2015; 386: 2059-2068Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (676) Google Scholar published the findings of the landmark PATHWAY-2 trial, which clearly established spironolactone as superior to other classes of antihypertensive drugs for treatment of resistant hypertension that is uncontrolled by a multidrug regimen comprised of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, thiazide-type diuretic, and a calcium channel blocker.1Williams B MacDonald TM Morant S et al.Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2): a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial.Lancet. 2015; 386: 2059-2068Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (676) Google Scholar Importantly from a clinical perspective, spironolactone provided antihypertensive benefit irrespective of baseline plasma renin concentrations, but was especially effective in patients with low renin concentrations. As renin release is progressively suppressed by increasing fluid retention, the observed inverse relation between renin concentration and the antihypertensive benefit of spironolactone provided indirect evidence that blocking the mineralocorticoid receptor treats resistant hypertension by overcoming, or at least diminishing, excess fluid retention. In The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, Williams and colleagues2Williams B MacDonald TM Morant SV et al.Endocrine and haemodynamic changes in resitant hypertension, and its response to spironolactone or amiloride: the PATHWAY-2 mechanims substudies.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018; (published online April 11.)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30071-8Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (134) Google Scholar now report the results of several PATHWAY-2 substudies that extend the main study findings, including by confirming that the antihypertensive benefit of spironolactone when treating resistant hypertension is largely related to its natriuretic and diuretic effects.2Williams B MacDonald TM Morant SV et al.Endocrine and haemodynamic changes in resitant hypertension, and its response to spironolactone or amiloride: the PATHWAY-2 mechanims substudies.Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018; (published online April 11.)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30071-8Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (134) Google Scholar Such an effect is consistent with resistant hypertension being broadly attributable to persistent fluid retention secondary to varying degrees of aldosterone excess. Additionally, in an optional, open-label, run-out phase substudy, the investigators further demonstrate that amiloride is an effective alternative to spironolactone for treating resistant hypertension. These new findings are important both for advancing our understanding of the mechanisms of resistant hypertension, and also in providing important clinical guidance for choice of drugs for more effective treatment of resistant hypertension. Findings from previous studies have suggested that resistant hypertension is largely volume dependent—ie, attributable to inappropriate fluid retention that persists despite use of multiple drug combinations, including conventional thiazide diuretics. Taler and colleagues3Taler SJ Textor SC Augustine JE Resistant hypertension: comparing hemodynamic management to specialist care.Hypertension. 2002; 39: 982-988Crossref PubMed Scopus (243) Google Scholar reported that antihypertensive treatment resistance was often related to occult volume expansion as shown by increased thoracic fluid content measured by bioimpedance. When noted, the higher thoracic fluid content facilitated enhanced blood pressure control through intensification of diuretic therapy.3Taler SJ Textor SC Augustine JE Resistant hypertension: comparing hemodynamic management to specialist care.Hypertension. 2002; 39: 982-988Crossref PubMed Scopus (243) Google Scholar Gaddam and colleagues4Gaddam K Corros C Pimenta E et al.Rapid reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy and intracardiac volume overload in patients with resistant hypertension and hyperaldosteronism: a prospective clinical study.Hypertension. 2010; 55: 1137-1142Crossref PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholar, 5Gaddam KK Nishizaka MK Pratt-Ubunama MN et al.Characterization of resistant hypertension: association between resistant hypertension, aldosterone, and persistent intravascular volume expansion.Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168: 1159-1164Crossref PubMed Scopus (243) Google Scholar reported that resistant hypertension, despite treatment with multidrug regimens, including hydrochlorothiazide, is characterised by persistent excess intravascular fluid retention in relation to aldos

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-8587(18)30080-9

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The antihypertensive benefit of MR antagonism seems to be related largely to its natriuretic and diuretic effects, which are consistent with an important role of MR activation in mediating obesity-associated sodium retention.

    “The antihypertensive benefit of MR antagonism seems to be related largely to its natriuretic and diuretic effects86, which are consistent with the important role of MR activation in mediating obesity-associated sodium retention88.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calhoun, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Calhoun, David A
Venue
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
431-433
ISSN
2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2797545495
Cited by
11
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
resistant hypertension, spironolactone, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, fluid retention, aldosterone excess, plasma renin concentration, amiloride, renin-angiotensin system, antihypertensive therapy, diuretic resistance, thiazide diuretics, calcium channel blockers
MeSH terms
Aldosterone, Amiloride, Blood Pressure, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hypertension, Spironolactone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review