Cited by 243COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Dapagliflozin in patients with cardiometabolic risk factors hospitalised with COVID-19 (DARE-19): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Open access
Kosiborod, Mikhail N, Esterline, Russell, Furtado, Remo H M, Oscarsson, Jan, Gasparyan, Samvel B, Koch, Gary G, Martinez, Felipe, Mukhtar, Omar +27 more·2021·The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology

Abstract

Background COVID-19 can lead to multiorgan failure. Dapagliflozin, a SGLT2 inhibitor, has significant protective benefits for the heart and kidney. We aimed to see whether this agent might provide organ protection in patients with COVID-19 by affecting processes dysregulated during acute illness.Methods DARE-19 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients hospitalised with COVID-19 and with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor (ie, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease). Patients critically ill at screening were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to dapagliflozin (10 mg daily orally) or matched placebo for 30 days. Dual primary outcomes were assessed in the intention-to-treat population: the outcome of prevention (time to new or worsened organ dysfunction or death), and the hierarchial composite outcome of recovery (change in clinical status by day 30). Safety outcomes, in patients who received at least one study medication dose, included serious adverse events, adverse events leading to discontinuation, and adverse events of interest. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04350593.Findings Between April 22, 2020 and Jan 1, 2021, 1250 patients were randomly assigned with 625 in each group. The primary composite outcome of prevention showed organ dysfunction or death occurred in 70 patients (11·2%) in the dapagliflozin group, and 86 (13·8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·80, 95% CI 0·58-1·10; p=0·17). For the primary outcome of recovery, 547 patients (87·5%) in the dapagliflozin group and 532 (85·1%) in the placebo group showed clinical status improvement, although this was not statistically significant (win ratio 1·09, 95% CI 0·97-1·22; p=0·14). There were 41 deaths (6·6%) in the dapagliflozin group, and 54 (8·6%) in the placebo group (HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·52-1·16). Serious adverse events were reported in 65 (10·6%) of 613 patients treated with dapagliflozin and in 82 (13·3%) of 616 patients given the placebo.Interpretation In patients with cardiometabolic risk factors who were hospitalised with COVID-19, treatment with dapagliflozin did not result in a statistically significant risk reduction in organ dysfunction or death, or improvement in clinical recovery, but was well tolerated.Funding AstraZeneca.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00180-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the DARE-19 RCT, dapagliflozin had a low risk of DKA (0.3% vs 0% in placebo) with structured monitoring of acid-base balance and kidney function during inpatient use in adults admitted with COVID-19 and at least one cardiometabolic risk factor without evidence of critical illness.

    “The Dapagli fl ozin in Respiratory Failure in Patients With COVID-19 (DARE-19) RCT demonstrated a low risk of DKA (0.3% vs. 0% in dapagli fl ozin-treated vs. placebo-treated participants) with structured monitoring of acid -base balance and kidney function during inpatient use in adults admitted with COVID-19 and at least one cardiometabolic risk factor without evidence of critical illness (159).”

    From Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) (2022) · cites this paper as [159]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some retrospective studies found severe hypoglycemia in patients with and without DM who received an IV insulin bolus for hyperkalemia in the emergency room or during hospitalization.

    “Some retrospective studies have demonstrated severe hypoglycemia inpersons with and without DMtreated with IV bolus of insulin for hyperkalemia in the emergency room or while hospitalized.1373,1374”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1373]

    The Outcomes section and Table 2 describe a randomized dapagliflozin trial in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, including safety findings on acute kidney injury and diabetic ketoacidosis. Searches for severe hypoglycemia after an IV insulin bolus for hyperkalemia, including emergency-room and inpatient treatment, found no passage addressing the claim. No page number was provided for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 243

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [35]35. Koch GG, Tangen CM, Jung JW, Amara IA. Issues for covariance analysis of dichotomous and ordered categorical data from randomized clinical trials and non-parametric strategies for addressing them. Stat Med 1998; 17: 1863-92.

Authors
Kosiborod, M. N., Esterline, R., Furtado, R. H. M., Oscarsson, J., Gasparyan, S. B., Koch, G. G., Martinez, F., Mukhtar, O., Verma, S., Chopra, V., Buenconsejo, J., Langkilde, A. M., Ambery, P., Tang, F., Gosch, K., Windsor, S. L., Akin, E. E., Soares, R. V. P., Moia, D. D. F., Aboudara, M., Hoffmann Filho, C. R., Feitosa, A. D. M., Fonseca, A., Garla, V., Gordon, R. A., Javaheri, A., Jaeger, C. P., Leaes, P. E., Nassif, M., Pursley, M., Silveira, F. S., Barroso, W. K. S., Lazcano Soto, J. R., Nigro Maia, L., & Berwanger, O.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
  • Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR)
  • AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Max Super Speciality Hospital (IN)
  • Saint Luke's Hospital (US)
  • Central Baptist Theological Seminary (US)
  • Saint Luke's Health System (US)
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • Endeavor Health (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Hospital Mãe de Deus (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Corresponding author
Kosiborod, Mikhail N
Venue
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
586-594
ISSN
2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3183300604
Cited by
243
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 23
FWCI
16.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Novartis
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Bayer Fund
  • Pfizer
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Servier
  • Amgen
  • Fundação Lemann
  • AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
SGLT2 inhibitors, COVID-19 pandemic, cardiometabolic risk factors, organ dysfunction, organ procurement, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, hospitalized patients, drug safety, adverse events, mortality, multiple organ failure
MeSH terms
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Cardiometabolic Risk Factors, COVID-19, Aged, Benzhydryl Compounds, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glucosides, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Organ Failure, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review