Cited by 953Pituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsAdrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances

Consensus on diagnosis and management of Cushing's disease: a guideline update

Open access
Fleseriu, Maria, Auchus, Richard, Bancos, Irina, Ben-Shlomo, Anat, Bertherat, Jerome, Biermasz, Nienke R, Boguszewski, Cesar L, Bronstein, Marcello D +45 more·2021·The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology

Abstract

Cushing’s disease (CD) requires accurate diagnosis, careful treatment selection, and long-term management to optimize patient outcomes. The Pituitary Society convened a Consensus Workshop comprising more than 50 academic researchers and clinical experts to discuss the application of recent evidence to clinical practice. In advance of the virtual meeting, recent data on screening and diagnosis; surgery, medical and radiation therapy; and disease- and treatment-related complications of CD were critically summarized in recorded lectures that were reviewed by all participants. During the meeting, concise summaries of the recorded lectures were presented, followed by small group breakout discussions. Consensus opinions from each group were collated into a draft document, which was reviewed and approved by all participants. Recommendations regarding use of laboratory tests, imaging, and treatment options are presented, along with algorithms for diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome and management of CD. Topics considered most important to address in future research are also identified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-8587(21)00235-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individually, none of the dynamic tests have 100% specificity because of high false-positive rates, and results can be discordant in up to 65% of patients.

    “Individually, none of these tests have 100% specificity because if high false-positive rates, and results can be discordant in up to 65% of patients (2) because of a number of factors including differences in type of ectopic tumor, patient age, patient sex, and severity of hypercortisolism (9).”

    From Approach to the Patient: Diagnosis of Cushing Syndrome (2022) · cites this paper as [9]

    In “Distinguishing Between CD and Ectopic ACTH-dependent CS,” the guideline says that no diagnostic test reaches 100% specificity and notes potential false-positive results. But it says results may be discordant in up to one-third of patients, not up to 65%. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Medical therapy rarely induces remission; instead, the goal is to achieve disease control using cortisol levels as a surrogate marker of treatment success.

    “Medical therapy rarely induces remission; instead, the goal is to achieve disease control using cortisol levels as a surrogate marker of treatment success (37, 38).”

    From Measuring cortisol in Cushing syndrome: diagnosis, monitoring, and cortisol circadian rhythm improvement. (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Medical Therapy: Clinical Considerations and Recommendations section says the goal in severe disease is to normalize cortisol levels and recommends monitoring cortisol alongside symptoms and comorbidities to assess treatment efficacy. The Targeting Adrenal Steroidogenesis section says these drugs control cortisol excess but do not directly target the pituitary adenoma. The copy does not establish that medical therapy rarely induces remission, and cortisol is not the sole measure of success; monitoring also includes clinical outcomes, with an exception for mifepristone. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In patients with CS, surgical resection of the causative lesion(s) is the first-line treatment option regardless of etiology.

    “In patients with CS, surgical resection of the causative lesion(s) is the first-line treatment option regardless of etiology.”

    From Measuring cortisol in Cushing syndrome: diagnosis, monitoring, and cortisol circadian rhythm improvement. (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Pituitary Surgery background recommends transsphenoidal surgery as first-line therapy for Cushing’s disease, supporting the claim for that cause of Cushing’s syndrome. The guideline does not extend that recommendation to Cushing’s syndrome regardless of etiology; its discussion of ectopic ACTH-dependent disease concerns diagnosis rather than first-line treatment. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Steroidogenesis inhibitors work by inhibiting one or more enzymes involved in steroidogenesis, decreasing cortisol and other steroid hormone production.

    “Steroidogenesis inhibitors work by inhibiting one or more enzymes involved in steroidogenesis, decreasing cortisol and other steroid hormone production (37, 38).”

    From Measuring cortisol in Cushing syndrome: diagnosis, monitoring, and cortisol circadian rhythm improvement. (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    The ‘Medical Therapy: Targeting Adrenal Steroidogenesis’ background says these inhibitors block one or more adrenal enzymes and decrease glucocorticoid synthesis and/or adrenal androgen production. The claim captures the mechanism and cortisol reduction, but its unqualified ‘and other steroid hormone production’ implies both effects occur generally; the source says ‘and/or’ and notes that hormones upstream of a blockade can build up. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • While there is no laboratory test to diagnose glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome, cortisol measurement provides utility in the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency.

    “While there is no laboratory test to diagnose glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome, cortisol measurement provides utility in the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (38).”

    From Measuring cortisol in Cushing syndrome: diagnosis, monitoring, and cortisol circadian rhythm improvement. (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    In “Medical Therapy: Clinical Considerations and Recommendations” (page not provided), the guideline says urinary free cortisol is not useful for diagnosing adrenal insufficiency and that morning cortisol may be used instead. Its mifepristone discussion also says low-cortisol measures typically help confirm adrenal insufficiency, except during mifepristone treatment. The passages do not state that no laboratory test can diagnose glucocorticoid withdrawal syndrome. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 272 · Cited by 953

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Cushing H The basophil adenomas of the pituitary body and their clinical manifestation. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1932; 50: 137– 95.
  2. [100]Fleseriu M, Biller B, Grossman A, Swearingen B, Melmed S, on behalf of the Pituitary Society International Cushing Disease Workshop Task Force. Hypercoagulability in Cushing disease: a risk awareness and prophylaxis survey on behalf of the Pituitary Society. 15th International Pituitary Congress; March 29–31, 2017; Orlando, Florida. Abstract P7.

Authors
Fleseriu, M., Auchus, R., Bancos, I., Ben-Shlomo, A., Bertherat, J., Biermasz, N. R., Boguszewski, C. L., Bronstein, M. D., Buchfelder, M., Carmichael, J. D., Casanueva, F. F., Castinetti, F., Chanson, P., Findling, J., Gadelha, M., Geer, E. B., Giustina, A., Grossman, A., Gurnell, M., Ho, K., Ioachimescu, A. G., Kaiser, U. B., Karavitaki, N., Katznelson, L., Kelly, D. F., Lacroix, A., McCormack, A., Melmed, S., Molitch, M., Mortini, P., Newell-Price, J., Nieman, L., Pereira, A. M., Petersenn, S., Pivonello, R., Raff, H., Reincke, M., Salvatori, R., Scaroni, C., Shimon, I., Stratakis, C. A., Swearingen, B., Tabarin, A., Takahashi, Y., Theodoropoulou, M., Tsagarakis, S., Valassi, E., Varlamov, E. V., Vila, G., Wass, J., Webb, S. M., Zatelli, M. C., & Biller, B. M. K.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • Université Paris Cité (FR)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
  • Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Rabin Medical Center (IL)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Université de Bordeaux (FR)
  • Nara Medical University (JP)
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
  • Evangelismos Hospital (GR)
  • Hospital de Sant Pau (ES)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
  • Churchill Hospital (GB)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • University of Ferrara (IT)
Corresponding author
Fleseriu, Maria
Venue
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
847-875
ISSN
2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3204188022
Cited by
953
References
272
Citations by year
2026: 205 · 2025: 223 · 2024: 208 · 2023: 181 · 2022: 133 · 2021: 1
FWCI
97.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  • Pfizer
  • Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals
  • National Institutes of Health (GPR101, PDE11A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Keywords
Cushing's disease, Cushing's syndrome, diagnosis, surgical treatment, medical therapy, radiotherapy, treatment complications, screening, diagnostic algorithm, pituitary adenoma
MeSH terms
Cushing Syndrome, Humans, Pituitary Gland, Consensus, Pituitary ACTH Hypersecretion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review