Cited by 72Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDietary Effects on Health

Early findings from the NHS Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission Programme: a prospective evaluation of real-world implementation

Open access
Valabhji, Jonathan, Gorton, Tessa, Barron, Emma, Safazadeh, Soraya, Earnshaw, Fiona, Helm, Clare, Virr, Martin, Kernan, John +10 more·2024·The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology

Abstract

Background Randomised controlled trials have shown that total diet replacement (TDR) can lead to remission of type 2 diabetes. In 2019, the English National Health Service (NHS) committed to establishing a TDR-based interventional programme delivered at scale within real-world environments; development followed of the NHS Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission (T2DR) programme, a 12-month behavioural intervention to support weight loss involving an initial 3-month period of TDR. We assessed remission of type 2 diabetes for programme participants. Methods In this national prospective service evaluation of programme implementation, people in England aged 18–65 years and diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in the last 6 years were referred to the programme between programme launch on Sept 1, 2020, and Dec 31, 2022. Programme data were linked to the National Diabetes Audit to ascertain HbA 1c measurements and glucose-lowering medication prescriptions. The primary outcome was remission of type 2 diabetes at 1 year, defined as two HbA 1c measurements of less than 48 mmol/mol recorded at least 3 months apart with no glucose-lowering medications prescribed from 3 months before the first HbA 1c measurement, and the second HbA 1c measurement recorded 11–15 months after the programme start date. Outcomes were assessed in two ways: for all participants who started TDR on the 12-month programme before January, 2022, for whom there were no missing data; and for all participants who started TDR on the 12-month programme before January, 2022, and had completed the programme (ie, had a valid weight recorded at month 12) by Dec 31, 2022, for whom there were no missing data. Findings Between Sept 1, 2020, and Dec 31, 2022, 7540 people were referred to the programme; of those, 1740 started TDR before January, 2022, and therefore had a full 12-month opportunity to undertake the programme by the time of data extraction at the end of December, 2022. Of those who started TDR before January, 2022, 960 (55%) completed the programme (defined as having a weight recorded at 12 months). The mean weight loss for the 1710 participants who started the programme before January, 2022 and had no missing data was 8·3% (95% CI 7·9–8·6) or 9·4 kg (8·9–9·8), and the mean weight loss for the 945 participants who completed the programme and had no missing data was 9·3% (8·8–9·8) or 10·3 kg (9·7–10·9). For the subgroup of 710 (42%) of 1710 participants who started the programme before January, 2022, and also had two HbA 1c measurements recorded, 190 (27%) had remission, with mean weight loss of 13·4% (12·3–14·5) or 14·8 kg (13·4–16·3). Of the 945 participants who completed the programme, 450 (48%) had two HbA 1c measurements recorded; of these, 145 (32%) had remission, with mean weight loss of 14·4% (13·2–15·5) or 15·9 kg (14·3–17·4). Interpretation Findings from the NHS T2DR programme show that remission of type 2 diabetes is possible outside of research settings, through at-scale service delivery. However, the rate of remission achieved is lower and the ascertainment of data is more limited with implementation in the real world than in randomised controlled trial settings. Funding None.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00194-3

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For people who already have diabetes, lifestyle modification and pharmacological treatment, as well as blood pressure and cholesterol control, can delay progression to complications and reduce mortality, or even help with remission, especially if started early.

    “For people who already have diabetes, lifestyle modification and pharmacological treatment, as well as blood pressure and cholesterol control, can delay progression to complications and reduce mortality, or even help with remission, especially if started early.1,2,58–62”

    From Worldwide trends in diabetes prevalence and treatment from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 1108 population-representative studies with 141 million participants (2024) · cites this paper as [62]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Rehackova L, Araujo-Soares V, Adamson AJ, Steven S, Taylor R, Sniehotta FF. Acceptability of a very low-energy diet in type 2 diabetes; patient experiences and behaviour regulation. Diabet Med 2017; 34: 1554-67.
  2. Rehackova L, Araujo-Soares V, Steven S, Adamson AJ, Taylor R, Sniehotta FF. Behaviour change during dietary type 2 diabetes remission: a longitudinal qualitative evaluation of an intervention using a very low energy diet. Diabet Med 2020; 37: 953-62.
  3. Ells LJ, Brown TJ, Matu J, et al. Evaluation of the NHS England Low- Calorie Diet implementation pilot: a coproduced mixed method study. Health Soc Care Deliv Res (in press).
  4. Barron E, Misra S, English E, et al. Experience of point-of-care HbA 1c testing in the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme: an observational study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020; 8: e001703.
  5. Holman N, Knighton P, Wild SH, et al. Cohort profile: National Diabetes Audit for England and Wales. Diabet Med 2021; 38: e14616.
  6. Riddle MC, Cefalu WT, Evans PH, et al. Consensus report: definition and interpretation of remission in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2021; 44: 2438-44.
  7. Taheri S, Zaghloul H, Chagoury O, et al. Effect of intensive lifestyle intervention on bodyweight and glycaemia in early type 2 diabetes (DIADEM-I): an open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020; 8: 477-89.
  8. Yang X, Zhou J, Shao H, et al. Effect of an intermittent calorie- restricted diet on type 2 diabetes remission: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol 2023; 108: 1415-24.
  9. Jones S, Brown T, Watson P, et al. Commercial provider staff experiences of the NHS Low Calorie Diet Programme pilot: a qualitative exploration of key barriers and facilitators. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24: 53.
  10. Dhir P, Maynard M, Drew KJ, Homer CV, Bakhai C, Ells LJ. South Asian individuals' experiences on the NHS low-calorie diet programme: a qualitative study in community settings in England. BMJ Open 2023; 13: e079939.
  11. Valabhji J, Barron E, Bradley D, et al. Early outcomes from the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: 152-60.
  12. Holman N, Khunti K, Wild SH, et al. Care processes in people in remission from type 2 diabetes: a cohort study using the National Diabetes Audit. Diabet Med 2023; 40: e15016.
  13. Jerome GJ, Dalcin A, Coughlin JW, et al. Longitudinal accuracy of web-based self-reported weights: results from the Hopkins POWER Trial. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16: e173.
  14. Hodge JM, Shah R, McCullough ML, Gapstur SM, Patel AV. Validation of self-reported height and weight in a large, nationwide cohort of U.S. adults. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0231229.
  15. Taylor R, Barnes AC, Hollingsworth KG, et al. Aetiology of type 2 diabetes in people with a 'normal' body mass index: testing the personal fat threshold hypothesis. Clin Sci (Lond) 2023; 137: 1333-46.
  16. Valabhji J. Bridging the worlds of research and policy making. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024; 12: 229-30.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valabhji, J., Gorton, T., Barron, E., Safazadeh, S., Earnshaw, F., Helm, C., Virr, M., Kernan, J., Crowe, S., Aveyard, P., Wilding, J., Willis, T., Ells, L., O'Neill, S., Robertson, E., Jebb, S., Taylor, R., & Bakhai, C.
Affiliations
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • London North West Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
  • Leeds Beckett University (GB)
  • Diabetes UK (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Valabhji, Jonathan
Venue
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
653-663
ISSN
2213-8587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401321825
Cited by
72
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 16
FWCI
23.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leeds Beckett Repository (Leeds Beckett University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
type 2 diabetes remission, total diet replacement, weight loss, behavioral interventions, real-world implementation, HbA1c, glucose-lowering medications, program completion, National Health Service, National Diabetes Audit, England, diabetes prevention and management, health service evaluation, cost-effectiveness, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, England, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Remission Induction, State Medicine, Program Evaluation, Weight Loss, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review