Progress on impoverishing health spending in 122 countries: a retrospective observational study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The goal of universal health coverage (UHC) requires that families who get needed health care do not suffer financial hardship as a result. This can be measured by instances of impoverishment, when a household's consumption including out-of-pocket spending on health is more than the poverty line but its consumption, excluding out-of-pocket spending, is less than the poverty line. This links UHC directly to the policy goal of reducing poverty. METHODS: We measure the incidence and depth of impoverishment as the difference in the poverty head count and poverty gap with and without out-of-pocket spending included in household total consumption. We use three poverty lines: the US$1·90 per day and $3·10 per day international poverty lines and a relative poverty line of 50% of median consumption per capita. We estimate impoverishment in 122 countries using 516 surveys between 1984 and 2015. We estimate the global incidence of impoverishment due to out-of-pocket payments by aggregating up from each country, using a survey for the year in question when available, and interpolation and model-based estimates otherwise. We do not derive global estimates to measure the depth of impoverishment but focus on the median depth for the 122 countries in our sample, accounting for 90% of the world's population. FINDINGS: We find impoverishment due to out-of-pocket spending even in countries where the entire population is officially covered by a health insurance scheme or by national or subnational health services. Incidence is negatively correlated with the share of total health spending channelled through social security funds and other government agencies. Across countries, the population-weighted median annual rate of change of impoverishment is negative at the $1·90 per day poverty line but positive at the $3·10 per day and relative poverty lines. We estimate that at the $1·90 per day poverty line, the worldwide incidence of impoverishment decreased between 2000 and 2010, from 131 million people (2·1% of the world's population) to 97 million people (1·4%). The population-weighted median of the poverty gap increase attributable to out-of-pocket health expenditures among the 122 countries in our sample are ¢1·22 per capita at the $1·90 per day poverty line and ¢3·74 per capita at the $3·10 per day poverty line. In all countries, out-of-pocket spending can be both catastrophic and impoverishing at all income levels, but this partly depends on the choice of the poverty line. INTERPRETATION: Out-of-pocket spending on health can add to the poverty head count and the depth of poverty by diverting household spending from non-health budget items. The scale of such impoverishment varies between countries and depends on the poverty line but might in some low-income countries account for as much as four percentage points of the poverty head count. Increasing the share of total health expenditure that is prepaid, especially through taxes and mandatory contributions, can help reduce impoverishment. FUNDING: Rockefeller Foundation, Ministry of Health of Japan, and UK Department for International Development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Widely used UHC indicators such as use rates and catastrophic health expenditure are generally reported at the national level and provide little insight into within-country variation or reasons for local performance.
“However, such statistics are generally reported at the national level and provide little insight into within-country variation or reasons for levels of performance at local levels [7–9].”
From Community and facility-level barriers to achieving UHC in Kono District, Sierra Leone and Maryland County, Liberia (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution
Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Leslie, H. H., Roder-DeWan, S., Adeyi, O., Barker, P., Daelmans, B., Doubova, S. V., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30386-3 · Cited by 4,057 · see citing works
Nandi, A., & Shet, A. (2020) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2019.1708669 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Revisiting the issue of access to medicines in Africa: Challenges and recommendations
Adebisi, Y. A., Nwogu, I. B., Alaran, A. J., Badmos, A. O., Bamgboye, A. O., Rufai, B. O., Okonji, O. C., Malik, M. O., Teibo, J. O., Abdalla, S. F., et al. (2022) · Public Health Challenges · doi:10.1002/puh2.9 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
An evaluation of health systems equity in Indonesia: study protocol
Wiseman, V., Thabrany, H., Asante, A., Haemmerli, M., Kosen, S., Gilson, L., Mills, A., Hayen, A., Tangcharoensathien, V., & Patcharanarumol, W. (2018) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/s12939-018-0822-0 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Vaccines development in India: advances, regulation, and challenges
Salalli, R., Dange, J. R., Dhiman, S., & Sharma, T. (2023) · Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research · doi:10.7774/cevr.2023.12.3.193 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Higgins, J., JEROME, J. G., Boima, F., Dally, E., Krangar, L., Boley, E. J., Toussaint, S., Dibba, Y., Kachimanga, C., Mhango, M., et al. (2023) · PLOS Global Public Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0002045 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wagstaff, A., Flores, G., Smitz, M.-F., Hsu, J., Chepynoga, K., & Eozenou, P.
- Affiliations
- World Bank (US)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Wagstaff, Adam
- Venue
- The Lancet Global Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e180-e192
- ISSN
- 2214-109X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2774462176
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 236 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 108.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2018-03-01)
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- World Health Organization
- Department for International Development, UK Government
- Rockefeller Foundation
- World Bank Group
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
- Keywords
- impoverishment, out-of-pocket health expenditure, catastrophic health expenditure, universal health coverage, health spending, poverty, health insurance coverage, social security funds, poverty gap, international poverty line, relative poverty, health care financing, household consumption, health system responsiveness, health system sustainability, health system integration
- MeSH terms
- Health Expenditures, Humans, Poverty, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Global Health, Universal Health Insurance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review