Cited by 759Child Nutrition and Water AccessGlobal Maternal and Child HealthViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology

Effects of water quality, sanitation, handwashing, and nutritional interventions on diarrhoea and child growth in rural Bangladesh: a cluster randomised controlled trial

Open access
Luby, Stephen P, Rahman, Mahbubur, Arnold, Benjamin F, Unicomb, Leanne, Ashraf, Sania, Winch, Peter J, Stewart, Christine P, Begum, Farzana +19 more·2018·The Lancet Global Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diarrhoea and growth faltering in early childhood are associated with subsequent adverse outcomes. We aimed to assess whether water quality, sanitation, and handwashing interventions alone or combined with nutrition interventions reduced diarrhoea or growth faltering. METHODS: The WASH Benefits Bangladesh cluster-randomised trial enrolled pregnant women from villages in rural Bangladesh and evaluated outcomes at 1-year and 2-years' follow-up. Pregnant women in geographically adjacent clusters were block-randomised to one of seven clusters: chlorinated drinking water (water); upgraded sanitation (sanitation); promotion of handwashing with soap (handwashing); combined water, sanitation, and handwashing; counselling on appropriate child nutrition plus lipid-based nutrient supplements (nutrition); combined water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition; and control (data collection only). Primary outcomes were caregiver-reported diarrhoea in the past 7 days among children who were in utero or younger than 3 years at enrolment and length-for-age Z score among children born to enrolled pregnant women. Masking was not possible for data collection, but analyses were masked. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCC01590095. FINDINGS: Between May 31, 2012, and July 7, 2013, 5551 pregnant women in 720 clusters were randomly allocated to one of seven groups. 1382 women were assigned to the control group; 698 to water; 696 to sanitation; 688 to handwashing; 702 to water, sanitation, and handwashing; 699 to nutrition; and 686 to water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition. 331 (6%) women were lost to follow-up. Data on diarrhoea at year 1 or year 2 (combined) were available for 14 425 children (7331 in year 1, 7094 in year 2) and data on length-for-age Z score in year 2 were available for 4584 children (92% of living children were measured at year 2). All interventions had high adherence. Compared with a prevalence of 5·7% (200 of 3517 child weeks) in the control group, 7-day diarrhoea prevalence was lower among index children and children under 3 years at enrolment who received sanitation (61 [3·5%] of 1760; prevalence ratio 0·61, 95% CI 0·46-0·81), handwashing (62 [3·5%] of 1795; 0·60, 0·45-0·80), combined water, sanitation, and handwashing (74 [3·9%] of 1902; 0·69, 0·53-0·90), nutrition (62 [3·5%] of 1766; 0·64, 0·49-0·85), and combined water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition (66 [3·5%] of 1861; 0·62, 0·47-0·81); diarrhoea prevalence was not significantly lower in children receiving water treatment (90 [4·9%] of 1824; 0·89, 0·70-1·13). Compared with control (mean length-for-age Z score -1·79), children were taller by year 2 in the nutrition group (mean difference 0·25 [95% CI 0·15-0·36]) and in the combined water, sanitation, handwashing, and nutrition group (0·13 [0·02-0·24]). The individual water, sanitation, and handwashing groups, and combined water, sanitation, and handwashing group had no effect on linear growth. INTERPRETATION: Nutrient supplementation and counselling modestly improved linear growth, but there was no benefit to the integration of water, sanitation, and handwashing with nutrition. Adherence was high in all groups and diarrhoea prevalence was reduced in all intervention groups except water treatment. Combined water, sanitation, and handwashing interventions provided no additive benefit over single interventions. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2214-109x(17)30490-4

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous water treatment and sanitation intervention trials conducted in urban informal settlements or peri-urban settings have typically only based effectiveness on demonstrated reductions in child diarrhea and/or improvements in child growth.

    “Previous water treatment and sanitation intervention trials conducted in urban informal settlements or peri-urban settings have typically only based effectiveness on demonstrated reductions in child diarrhea and/or improvements in child growth 110,112-114 .”

    From Urban informal settlements as hotspots of antimicrobial resistance and the need to curb environmental transmission. (2020) · cites this paper as [114]

    The Methods (Outcomes; page not available) identify child diarrhoea and growth as the trial’s primary outcomes, supporting that part of the claim. But the Methods (Study design; page not available) place this trial in rural Bangladeshi villages, not an urban informal settlement or peri-urban setting. The paper also assessed child mortality as a tertiary outcome, so “only” is too strong for this trial. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence on the impact of improving household safe drinking water sources and/or treatment and storage, access to basic latrines and handwashing with soap on overall enteric pathogen detection and diarrhoea in children under 2 years of age is mixed, with some rigorously controlled and well-powered trials of interventions reporting little impact, even with high levels of behavioural compliance.

    “Evidence on impact of improving household safe drinking water sources and/or treatment and storage, access to basic latrines and handwashing with soap on overall enteric pathogen detection and diarrhoea in children under 2 years of age is mixed, with some rigorously controlled and well-powered trials of interventions reporting little impact, even with high levels of behavioural compliance.1 6 7”

    From Environmental and behavioural exposure pathways associated with diarrhoea and enteric pathogen detection in 5-month-old, periurban Kenyan infants: a cross-sectional study (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 759

Authors
Luby, S. P., Rahman, M., Arnold, B. F., Unicomb, L., Ashraf, S., Winch, P. J., Stewart, C. P., Begum, F., Hussain, F., Benjamin-Chung, J., Leontsini, E., Naser, A. M., Parvez, S. M., Hubbard, A. E., Lin, A., Nizame, F. A., Jannat, K., Ercumen, A., Ram, P. K., Das, K. K., Abedin, J., Clasen, T. F., Dewey, K. G., Fernald, L. C., Null, C., Ahmed, T., & Colford, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (BD)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Luby, Stephen P
Venue
The Lancet Global Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
e302-e315
ISSN
2214-109X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2785371307
Cited by
759
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 148 · 2019: 106 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 1
FWCI
88.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Keywords
diarrhea, child growth, failure to thrive, water quality, drinking water chlorination, sanitation, handwashing with soap, lipid-based nutrient supplements, WASH interventions, length-for-age z-score, children under five, pregnant women, rural Bangladesh, intervention adherence
MeSH terms
Adult, Bangladesh, Child Development, Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Child, Preschool, Diarrhea, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hand Disinfection, Humans, Infant, Male, Pregnancy, Rural Population, Sanitation, Program Evaluation, Cluster Analysis, Young Adult, Water Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review