Cited by 234Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesCancer Risks and Factors

Breast cancer survival and survival gap apportionment in sub-Saharan Africa (ABC-DO): a prospective cohort study

Open access
McCormack, Valerie, McKenzie, Fiona, Foerster, Milena, Zietsman, Annelle, Galukande, Moses, Adisa, Charles, Anele, Angelica, Parham, Groesbeck +10 more·2020·The Lancet Global Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death from cancer in women in sub-Saharan Africa, yet there are few well characterised large-scale survival studies with complete follow-up data. We aimed to provide robust survival estimates in women in this setting and apportion the survival gaps. METHODS: The African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes (ABC-DO) prospective cohort study was done at eight hospitals across five sub-Saharan African countries (Namibia, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia). We prospectively recruited women (aged ≥18 years) who attended these hospitals with suspected breast cancer. Women were actively followed up by use of a telephone call once every 3 months, and a mobile health application was used to keep a dynamic record of follow-up calls due. We collected detailed sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment data. The primary outcome was 3-year overall survival, analysed by use of flexible proportional mortality models, and we predicted survival under scenarios of modified distributions of risk factors. FINDINGS: Between Sept 8, 2014, and Dec 31, 2017, 2313 women were recruited from these eight hospitals, of whom 85 did not have breast cancer. Of the remaining 2228 women with breast cancer, 58 women with previous treatment or recurrence, and 14 women from small racial groups (white and Asian women in South Africa), were excluded. Of the 2156 women analysed, 1840 (85%) were histologically confirmed, 129 (6%) were cytologically confirmed, and 187 (9%) were clinically confirmed to have breast cancer. 2156 (97%) women were followed up for up to 3 years or up to Jan 1, 2019, whichever was earlier. Up to this date, 879 (41%) of these women had died, 1118 (52%) were alive, and 159 (7%) were censored early. 3-year overall survival was 50% (95% CI 48-53), but we observed variations in 3-year survival between different races in Namibia (from 90% in white women to 56% in Black women) and in South Africa (from 76% in mixed-race women to 59% in Black women), and between different countries (44-47% in Uganda and Zambia vs 36% in Nigeria). 215 (10%) of all women had died within 6 months of diagnosis, but 3-year overall survival remained low in women who survived to this timepoint (58%). Among survival determinants, improvements in early diagnosis and treatment were predicted to contribute to the largest increases in survival, with a combined absolute increase in survival of up to 22% in Nigeria, Zambia, and Uganda, when compared with the contributions of other factors (such as HIV or aggressive subtypes). INTERPRETATION: Large variations in breast cancer survival in sub-Saharan African countries indicate that improvements are possible. At least a third of the projected 416 000 breast cancer deaths that will occur in this region in the next decade could be prevented through achievable downstaging and improvements in treatment. Improving survival in socially disadvantaged women warrants special attention. FUNDING: Susan G Komen and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2214-109x(20)30261-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCormack, V., McKenzie, F., Foerster, M., Zietsman, A., Galukande, M., Adisa, C., Anele, A., Parham, G., Pinder, L. F., Cubasch, H., Joffe, M., Beaney, T., Quaresma, M., Togawa, K., Abedi-Ardekani, B., Anderson, B. O., Schüz, J., & dos-Santos-Silva, I.
Affiliations
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • Makerere University (UG)
  • Abia State University (NG)
  • Federal Medical Centre (NG)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
McCormack, Valerie
Venue
The Lancet Global Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
e1203-e1212
ISSN
2214-109X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3061102166
Cited by
234
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 6
FWCI
10.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Global Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Susan G. Komen for the Cure (GSP18IARC001, GSP19IARC001, IIR 13264158)
  • Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
breast cancer, overall survival, survival gap, survival disparities, sub-Saharan Africa, racial disparities, ethnic disparities, survival prediction, risk factor distribution, breast cancer outcomes, women's health equity, Namibia, South Africa, Uganda, Zambia, Nigeria, mobile health apps, telephone follow-up
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Survival Rate, Africa South of the Sahara

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review