Breast cancer survival and survival gap apportionment in sub-Saharan Africa (ABC-DO): a prospective cohort study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death from cancer in women in sub-Saharan Africa, yet there are few well characterised large-scale survival studies with complete follow-up data. We aimed to provide robust survival estimates in women in this setting and apportion the survival gaps. METHODS: The African Breast Cancer-Disparities in Outcomes (ABC-DO) prospective cohort study was done at eight hospitals across five sub-Saharan African countries (Namibia, Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia). We prospectively recruited women (aged ≥18 years) who attended these hospitals with suspected breast cancer. Women were actively followed up by use of a telephone call once every 3 months, and a mobile health application was used to keep a dynamic record of follow-up calls due. We collected detailed sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment data. The primary outcome was 3-year overall survival, analysed by use of flexible proportional mortality models, and we predicted survival under scenarios of modified distributions of risk factors. FINDINGS: Between Sept 8, 2014, and Dec 31, 2017, 2313 women were recruited from these eight hospitals, of whom 85 did not have breast cancer. Of the remaining 2228 women with breast cancer, 58 women with previous treatment or recurrence, and 14 women from small racial groups (white and Asian women in South Africa), were excluded. Of the 2156 women analysed, 1840 (85%) were histologically confirmed, 129 (6%) were cytologically confirmed, and 187 (9%) were clinically confirmed to have breast cancer. 2156 (97%) women were followed up for up to 3 years or up to Jan 1, 2019, whichever was earlier. Up to this date, 879 (41%) of these women had died, 1118 (52%) were alive, and 159 (7%) were censored early. 3-year overall survival was 50% (95% CI 48-53), but we observed variations in 3-year survival between different races in Namibia (from 90% in white women to 56% in Black women) and in South Africa (from 76% in mixed-race women to 59% in Black women), and between different countries (44-47% in Uganda and Zambia vs 36% in Nigeria). 215 (10%) of all women had died within 6 months of diagnosis, but 3-year overall survival remained low in women who survived to this timepoint (58%). Among survival determinants, improvements in early diagnosis and treatment were predicted to contribute to the largest increases in survival, with a combined absolute increase in survival of up to 22% in Nigeria, Zambia, and Uganda, when compared with the contributions of other factors (such as HIV or aggressive subtypes). INTERPRETATION: Large variations in breast cancer survival in sub-Saharan African countries indicate that improvements are possible. At least a third of the projected 416 000 breast cancer deaths that will occur in this region in the next decade could be prevented through achievable downstaging and improvements in treatment. Improving survival in socially disadvantaged women warrants special attention. FUNDING: Susan G Komen and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Of the mixed approach mHealth interventions, all except two are on pilot test stage.
“Of the mixed approach of mHealth interventions all, except [51,64] which are large scale implementation, are on pilot test stage.”
From Current evidence on the use of mHealth approaches in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as [64]
Cites
Standard cancer patient population for age standardising survival ratios
Corazziari, I., Quinn, M., & Capocaccia, R. (2004) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.002 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., & Bray, F. (2021) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21660 · Cited by 108,699 · see citing works
Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040
Arnold, M., Morgan, E., Rumgay, H., Mafra, A., Singh, D., Laversanne, M., Vignat, J., Gralow, J. R., Cardoso, F., Siesling, S., et al. (2022) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.010 · Cited by 3,411 · see citing works
Current evidence on the use of mHealth approaches in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review
Aboye, G. T., Vande Walle, M., Simegn, G. L., & Aerts, J.-M. (2023) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100806 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Aboye, G. T., Vande Walle, M., Simegn, G. L., & Aerts, J.-M. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231180972 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCormack, V., McKenzie, F., Foerster, M., Zietsman, A., Galukande, M., Adisa, C., Anele, A., Parham, G., Pinder, L. F., Cubasch, H., Joffe, M., Beaney, T., Quaresma, M., Togawa, K., Abedi-Ardekani, B., Anderson, B. O., Schüz, J., & dos-Santos-Silva, I.
- Affiliations
- Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
- Makerere University (UG)
- Abia State University (NG)
- Federal Medical Centre (NG)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Corresponding author
- McCormack, Valerie
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Global Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e1203-e1212
- ISSN
- 2214-109X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7450275
- OpenAlex
- W3061102166
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 36 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 10.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Global Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- Susan G. Komen for the Cure (GSP18IARC001, GSP19IARC001, IIR 13264158)
- Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Keywords
- breast cancer, overall survival, survival gap, survival disparities, sub-Saharan Africa, racial disparities, ethnic disparities, survival prediction, risk factor distribution, breast cancer outcomes, women's health equity, Namibia, South Africa, Uganda, Zambia, Nigeria, mobile health apps, telephone follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Survival Rate, Africa South of the Sahara
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review