Cited by 594Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management

Standard cancer patient population for age standardising survival ratios

Corazziari, Isabella, Quinn, Mike, Capocaccia, Riccardo·2004·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Standard adult cancer patients populations are derived in this paper as a tool for the calculation of age-standardised cancer survival figures. Previously used standards in survival analysis have been site- and/or study-specific. Here, multivariate methods have been used to define the smallest possible number of general standard cancer patient populations which are simple to use and provide standardised survival values close to the raw ones for the largest possible number of cancer sites. The analysis was based on data for over 1.1 million cancer patients included in the EUROCARE-2 study. The proposed standard populations consist of three age distributions, appropriate for cancers with incidence patterns: (1) increasing with age - the vast majority of cancers; (2) broadly constant with age and (3) mainly affecting young adults. The three standard distributions are presented by both broad and five-year age classes. The latter can be used to determine which of the three standards would be used for sites not included in the cluster analysis because their survival is generally calculated in unusual age groups. Overall, standard 1 is appropriate for over 91% of cases, standard 2 for just over 7%, and standard 3 for less than 2%. The proposed standards were tested on European (EUROCARE-2 and EUROCARE-3) and US (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program, SEER) relative survival data. There was very good correspondence between the raw (population weighted) and age-standardised survival figures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.002

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corazziari, I., Quinn, M., & Capocaccia, R.
Affiliations
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
  • Office for National Statistics (GB)
Corresponding author
Capocaccia, Riccardo
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
40
Issue
15
Pages
2307-2316
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077720730
Cited by
589
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 26
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Keywords
age adjustment, cancer survival, standard population, age distribution, relative survival, SEER, cancer incidence patterns
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Reference Standards, Multivariate Analysis, Cluster Analysis, Survival Analysis, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review