Cited by 24Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsPharmaceutical industry and healthcareAcademic Publishing and Open Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Reporting summary results in clinical trial registries: updated guidance from WHO

Open access
Chan, An-Wen, Karam, Ghassan, Pymento, Justin, Askie, Lisa M, da Silva, Luiza R, Aymé, Ségolène, Taylor, Christopher Marc, Hooft, Lotty, Ross, Anna Laura, Moorthy, Vasee·2025·The Lancet Global Health

Abstract

The importance of publicly registering clinical trials and reporting their results in registries is widely recognised. While substantial progress has been made with registering trials before enrolment, the availability of results in registries remains uncommon despite expanding legislative and funder requirements-leading to an incomplete evidence base and avoidable waste of resources, particularly for unpublished trials. This paper discusses the rationale for reporting summary results in trial registries, reviews the current landscape of registry policies, and presents new WHO guidance for reporting results in registries. The 2025 WHO guidance was developed after consultation with relevant parties, including researchers, patients, sponsors, funders, regulators, journal editors, registry administrators, and the public. The guidance defines eight minimum items that are essential for understanding and interpreting the summary results for all trials. Implementation of the WHO guidance by trial registries, broad adherence by investigators and sponsors, and endorsement by funders, regulators, legislators, research ethics committees, patient organisations, and journals can help enhance the contribution of trials to scientific knowledge, patient care, and health policy.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2214-109x(24)00514-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 24

Metadata

Authors
Chan, A.-W., Karam, G., Pymento, J., Askie, L. M., da Silva, L. R., Aymé, S., Taylor, C. M., Hooft, L., Ross, A. L., & Moorthy, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Corresponding author
Chan, An-Wen
Venue
The Lancet Global Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-04
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
e759-e768
ISSN
2214-109X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408936335
Cited by
24
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
clinical trial registries, WHO guidelines, clinical trial registration, unpublished trials, research transparency
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Registries, World Health Organization, Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review