Hooft, Lotty
Utrecht University · University Medical Center Utrecht
40 papers on CoChatORCID 0000-0002-7950-2980
Most cited papers
- Verified
STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., et al. (2015) · BMJ
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 3,660
- Verified
Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement
McInnes, M. D. F., Moher, D., Thombs, B. D., McGrath, T. A., Bossuyt, P. M., and the PRISMA-DTA Group, Clifford, T., Cohen, J. F., Deeks, J. J., Gatsonis, C., et al. (2018) · JAMA
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsDelphi Technique in Research
Cited by 3,210
- Verified
STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration
Cohen, J. F., Korevaar, D. A., Altman, D. G., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Hooft, L., Irwig, L., Levine, D., Reitsma, J. B., de Vet, H. C. W., et al. (2016) · BMJ Open
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 2,570
- Verified
PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods
Moons, K. G. M., Damen, J. A. A., Kaul, T., Hooft, L., Andaur Navarro, C., Dhiman, P., Beam, A. L., Van Calster, B., Celi, L. A., Denaxas, S., et al. (2025) · BMJ
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 1,069
- Verified
STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., de Vet, H. C. W., et al. (2015) · Clinical Chemistry
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 984
- Verified
Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review
Damen, J. A. A. G., Hooft, L., Schuit, E., Debray, T. P. A., Collins, G. S., Tzoulaki, I., Lassale, C. M., Siontis, G. C. M., Chiocchia, V., Roberts, C., et al. (2016) · BMJ
Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Cited by 935
- Verified
Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
Collins, G. S., Dhiman, P., Andaur Navarro, C. L., Ma, J., Hooft, L., Reitsma, J. B., Logullo, P., Beam, A. L., Peng, L., Van Calster, B., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 852
- Verified
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist
Salameh, J.-P., Bossuyt, P. M., McGrath, T. A., Thombs, B. D., Hyde, C. J., Macaskill, P., Deeks, J. J., Leeflang, M., Korevaar, D. A., Whiting, P., et al. (2020) · BMJ
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsClinical practice guidelines implementation
Cited by 719
- Verified
A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance
Debray, T. P. A., Damen, J. A. A. G., Snell, K. I. E., Ensor, J., Hooft, L., Reitsma, J. B., Riley, R. D., & Moons, K. G. M. (2017) · BMJ
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 657
- Verified
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
Dinnes, J., Deeks, J. J., Berhane, S., Taylor, M., Adriano, A., Davenport, C., Dittrich, S., Emperador, D., Takwoingi, Y., Cunningham, J., et al. (2021) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
SARS-CoV-2 detection and testingCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Cited by 591
- Verified
Variation of a test’s sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence
Leeflang, M. M. G., Rutjes, A. W. S., Reitsma, J. B., Hooft, L., & Bossuyt, P. M. M. (2013) · Canadian Medical Association Journal
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 530
- Verified
Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review
de Hond, A. A. H., Leeuwenberg, A. M., Hooft, L., Kant, I. M. J., Nijman, S. W. J., van Os, H. J. A., Aardoom, J. J., Debray, T. P. A., Schuit, E., van Smeden, M., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Cited by 499
- Verified
Risk of bias in studies on prediction models developed using supervised machine learning techniques: systematic review
Andaur Navarro, C. L., Damen, J. A. A., Takada, T., Nijman, S. W. J., Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Collins, G. S., Bajpai, R., Riley, R. D., Moons, K. G. M., et al. (2021) · BMJ
Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Cited by 415
- Verified
The STARD-AI reporting guideline for diagnostic accuracy studies using artificial intelligence
Sounderajah, V., Guni, A., Liu, X., Collins, G. S., Karthikesalingam, A., Markar, S. R., Golub, R. M., Denniston, A. K., Shetty, S., Moher, D., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Cited by 352
- Verified
Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol
Sounderajah, V., Ashrafian, H., Golub, R. M., Shetty, S., De Fauw, J., Hooft, L., Moons, K., Collins, G., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., et al. (2021) · BMJ Open
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Cited by 333
- Verified
A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
Debray, T. P., Damen, J. A., Riley, R. D., Snell, K., Reitsma, J. B., Hooft, L., Collins, G. S., & Moons, K. G. (2019) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 278
- Verified
Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus
Langendam, M., Luijf, Y. M., Hooft, L., DeVries, J. H., Mudde, A. H., & Scholten, R. J. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and Education
Cited by 262
- Verified
Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Damen, J. A., Pajouheshnia, R., Heus, P., Moons, K. G. M., Reitsma, J. B., Scholten, R. J. P. M., Hooft, L., & Debray, T. P. A. (2019) · BMC Medicine
Health Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Cited by 250
- Verified
Barriers to GPs' use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review
Zwolsman, S., te Pas, E., Hooft, L., Waard, M. W.-D., & van Dijk, N. (2012) · British Journal of General Practice
Health Sciences Research and EducationClinical practice guidelines implementation
Cited by 208
- Verified
Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies
Hooijmans, C. R., de Vries, R. B. M., Ritskes-Hoitinga, M., Rovers, M. M., Leeflang, M. M., IntHout, J., Wever, K. E., Hooft, L., de Beer, H., Kuijpers, T., et al. (2018) · PLOS ONE
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAnimal testing and alternatives
Cited by 176
- Verified
Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin”
Ochodo, E. A., de Haan, M. C., Reitsma, J. B., Hooft, L., Bossuyt, P. M., & Leeflang, M. M. G. (2013) · Radiology
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 158
- Verified
Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Andaur Navarro, C. L., Speich, B., Bullock, G., Damen, J. A. A., Hooft, L., Kirtley, S., Riley, R. D., Van Calster, B., et al. (2022) · BMC Medical Research Methodology
Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Cited by 140
- Verified
Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models
Andaur Navarro, C. L., Damen, J. A. A., van Smeden, M., Takada, T., Nijman, S. W. J., Dhiman, P., Ma, J., Collins, G. S., Bajpai, R., Riley, R. D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 121
- Verified
Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD
Korevaar, D. A., van Enst, W. A., Spijker, R., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & Hooft, L. (2014) · Evidence Based Medicine
Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology
Cited by 119
Go further with a free account
Verify every reference, keep papers in a library, and ask questions across them.
Sign up - it is free