The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: 1 year follow-up of an open-label trial
Abstract
Background Anorexia nervosa is a life-threatening illness. Brain circuits believed to drive anorexia nervosa symptoms can be accessed with surgical techniques such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). Initial results suggest that DBS of the subcallosal cingulate is safe and associated with improvements in mood and anxiety. Here, we investigated the safety, clinical, and neuroimaging outcomes of DBS of the subcallosal cingulate in a group of patients during 12 months of active stimulation.Methods We did this prospective open-label trial at the Department of Surgery of the University of Toronto (Toronto, ON, Canada). Patients were eligible to participate if they were aged 20-60 years and had a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (restricting or binge-purging subtype) and a demonstrated history of chronicity or treatment resistance. Following a period of medical stabilisation, patients underwent surgery for DBS and received open-label continuous stimulation for the entire 1 year study duration. The primary outcome was safety and acceptability of the procedure. The secondary outcomes were body-mass index (BMI), mood, anxiety, affective regulation, and anorexia nervosa-specific behaviours at 12 months after surgery, as well as changes in neural circuitry (measured with PET imaging of cerebral glucose metabolism at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after surgery). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01476540.Findings 16 patients with treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa were enrolled between September, 2011, and January, 2014, and underwent DBS of the subcallosal cingulate between November, 2011, and April, 2014. Patients had a mean age of 34 years (SD 8) and average illness duration of 18 years (SD 6). Two patients requested that their devices be removed or deactivated during the study, although their reasons for doing so were poorly defined. The most common adverse event was pain related to surgical incision or positioning that required oral analgesics for longer than 3-4 days after surgery (five [31%] of 16 patients). Seven (44%) of 16 patients had serious adverse events, most of which were related to the underlying illness, including electrolyte disturbances. Average BMI at surgery was 13·83 (SD 1·49) and 14 (88%) of the 16 patients had comorbid mood disorders, anxiety disorders, or both. Mean BMI after 12 months of stimulation was 17·34 (SD 3·40; p=0·0009 vs baseline). DBS was associated with significant improvements in measures of depression (mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores 19·40 [SD 6·76] at baseline vs 8·79 [7·64] at 12 months; p=0·00015), anxiety (mean Beck Anxiety Inventory score 38·00 [15·55] vs 27·14 [18·39]; p=0·035), and affective regulation (mean Dysfunction in Emotional Regulation Scale score 131·80 [22·04] vs 104·36 [31·27]; p=0·019). We detected significant changes in cerebral glucose metabolism in key anorexia nervosa-related structures at both 6 months and 12 months of ongoing brain stimulation.Interpretation In patients with chronic treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa, DBS is well tolerated and is associated with significant and sustained improvements in affective symptoms, BMI, and changes in neural circuitry at 12 months after surgery.Funding Klarman Family Foundation Grants Program in Eating Disorders Research and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Comorbid psychiatric disorders may favor specific targets, such as comorbid OCD or OC symptoms favoring VC/VS and anorexia favoring SCC stimulation.
“Similarly, comorbid psychiatric disorders may favor the choice of specific targets in depression, i.e., comorbid OCD or significant OC symptoms may favor a VC/VS target, and depressed patients with anorexia may respond to SCC stimulation [102].”
From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [102]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Lipsman, N., Lam, E., Volpini, M., Sutandar, K., Twose, R., Giacobbe, P., Sodums, D. J., Smith, G. S., Woodside, D. B., & Lozano, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University Health Network (CA)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- The Lancet Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 285-294
- ISSN
- 2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2589284845
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 10
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Keywords
- deep brain stimulation, subcallosal cingulate, anorexia nervosa, body mass index, brain glucose metabolism, positron emission tomography, mood and anxiety, emotion regulation, adverse events, device removal, restrictive anorexia nervosa, neuroimaging findings, long-term follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Anxiety, Brain, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glucose, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Ontario, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Recurrence, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Deep Brain Stimulation, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review