Cited by 7Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Approval of esketamine for treatment-resistant depression – Authors' reply

Open access
Naudet, Florian, Cristea, Ioana A·2020·The Lancet Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30040-7

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cristea IA, Naudet F. US Food and Drug Administration approval of esketamine and brexanolone. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6: 975-77.
  2. Singh JB, Daly EJ, Mathews M, et al. Approval of esketamine for treatmentresistant depression. Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7: 232-34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naudet, F., & Cristea, I. A.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of Pavia (IT)
Corresponding author
Cristea, Ioana A
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
235-236
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008491249
Cited by
7
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
esketamine, treatment-resistant depression, regulatory approval, minimal clinically important difference, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, significance testing, sample size determination, clinical trial endpoints, European Medicines Agency
MeSH terms
Depression, Humans, Ketamine, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review