Cited by 68Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyStudy and Philosophy of ReligionWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Spirituality and mental health: challenges and opportunities

Rosmarin, David H, Pargament, Kenneth I, Koenig, Harold G·2021·The Lancet Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30048-1

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosmarin, D. H., Pargament, K. I., & Koenig, H. G.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Corresponding author
Rosmarin, David H
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
92-93
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008357666
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
John Templeton Foundation (60877)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
spirituality, mental health, research funding, religious affiliation, neurosis
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Religion and Psychology, Self Concept, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review