The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background Cognitive bias modification (CBM) therapies, including attention bias modification, interpretation bias modification, or approach and avoidance training, are prototypical examples of mechanistically derived treatments, but their effectiveness is contentious. We aimed to assess the relative effectiveness of various CBM interventions for anxious and depressive symptomatology.Methods For this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register from database inception up until Feb 7, 2020. We included randomised controlled trials of CBM versus control conditions or other forms of CBM for adults aged 18 years and older with clinical or subclinical anxiety or depression measured with a diagnostic interview or a validated clinical scale. We excluded studies comparing CBM with a non-CBM active intervention. Two researchers independently selected studies and evaluated risk of bias with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Primary outcomes encompassed anxiety and depressive symptoms measured with validated clinical scales. We computed standardised mean differences (SMDs) with a restricted maximum likelihood random effects model. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018086113.Findings From 2125 records we selected 85 trials, 65 (n=3897) on anxiety and 20 (n=1116) on depression. In a well connected network of anxiety trials, interpretation bias modification outperformed waitlist (SMD -0·55, 95% CI -0·91 to -0·19) and sham training (SMD -0·30, -0·50 to -0·10) for the primary outcome. Attention bias modification showed benefits only in post-hoc sensitivity analyses excluding post-traumatic stress disorder trials. Prediction intervals for all findings were large, including an SMD of 0. Networks of depression trials displayed evidence of inconsistency. Only four randomised controlled trials had low risk of bias on all six domains assessed.Interpretation CBM interventions showed consistent but small benefits; however heterogeneity and risk of bias undermine the reliability of these findings. Larger, definitive trials for interpretation bias modification for anxiety might be warranted, but insufficient evidence precludes conclusions for depression.Funding Romanian Ministry of Research and Innovation, The National Council for Scientific Research-The Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A recent systematic review 518 suggests antidepressant medicine-specifically fluoxetine- alone or in combination with CBT is the most efficacious treatment in moderate-to-severe depressive disorder. However, the quality of the evidence is low.”
From Time for united action on depression: a Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission (2022) · cites this paper as [518]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Hutton, B., Salanti, G., Caldwell, D. M., Chaimani, A., Schmid, C. H., Cameron, C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Straus, S., Thorlund, K., Jansen, J. P., et al. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m14-2385 · Cited by 8,269
A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2008.00552.x · Cited by 2,569
Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
Dias, S., Welton, N. J., Caldwell, D. M., & Ades, A. E. (2010) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.3767 · Cited by 2,521
Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA
Chaimani, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Mavridis, D., Spyridonos, P., & Salanti, G. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076654 · Cited by 2,473
Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies
Higgins, J. P. T., Jackson, D., Barrett, J. K., Lu, G., Ades, A. E., & White, I. R. (2012) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1044 · Cited by 2,098
White, I. R., Barrett, J. K., Jackson, D., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2012) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1045 · Cited by 1,114
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Time for united action on depression: a Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission
Herrman, H., Patel, V., Kieling, C., Berk, M., Buchweitz, C., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., Kessler, R. C., Kohrt, B. A., Maj, M., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02141-3 · Cited by 1,104
Self-citationThe role of attention control in complex real-world tasks
Draheim, C., Pak, R., Draheim, A. A., & Engle, R. W. (2022) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-021-02052-2 · Cited by 172
Neurobiology and systems biology of stress resilience
Kalisch, R., Russo, S. J., & Müller, M. B. (2024) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00042.2023 · Cited by 149
Clauss, K. E., Gorday, J. Y., & Bardeen, J. R. (2022) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102142 · Cited by 121
Martinelli, A., Grüll, J., & Baum, C. (2022) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2022.104180 · Cited by 89
Trambaiolli, L. R., Kohl, S. H., Linden, D. E. J., & Mehler, D. M. A. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.015 · Cited by 81
Psychological Treatments for Anhedonia
Sandman, C. F., & Craske, M. G. (2021) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2021_291 · Cited by 73
Invisible challenges in healthcare leadership
Lepez, C. O. (2023) · Health Leadership and Quality of Life · doi:10.56294/hl202335 · Cited by 61
“Don't [ruminate], be happy”: A cognitive perspective linking depression and anhedonia
Rutherford, A. V., McDougle, S. D., & Joormann, J. (2023) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102255 · Cited by 64
Dwyer, P. S. R., Williams, Z. J., Lawson, W. B., & Rivera, S. M. (2024) · Neurodiversity · doi:10.1177/27546330241237883 · Cited by 73
Attentional biases in human anxiety
Valadez, E. A., Pine, D. S., Fox, N. A., & Bar‐Haim, Y. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104917 · Cited by 65
Woud, M. L., Blackwell, S. E., Shkreli, L., Würtz, F., Cwik, J. C., Margraf, J., Holmes, E. A., Steudte‐Schmiedgen, S., Herpertz, S., & Kessler, H. (2021) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000514166 · Cited by 55
Wang, Z., Li, Y., An, J., Dong, W., Li, H., Ma, H., Wang, J., Wu, J., Jiang, T., & Wang, G. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19137878 · Cited by 51
Dykan, C. D. G., Lazarov, A., & Bar‐Haim, Y. (2020) · Evidence-Based Mental Health · doi:10.1136/ebmental-2020-300216 · Cited by 45
Würtz, F., Zahler, L., Blackwell, S. E., Margraf, J., Bagheri, M., & Woud, M. L. (2022) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102133 · Cited by 52
Attention bias modification for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Xia, H., Li, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhong, D., Liu, X.-B., Gou, X.-Y., Fan, J., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Ai, S., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1098610 · Cited by 39
Efficacy of attention bias modification training for depressed adults: a randomized clinical trial
Hsu, K. J., Shumake, J., Longoria, K. D., Risom, S., Labrada, J., Smits, J. A. J., Schnyer, D. M., & Beevers, C. G. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721000702 · Cited by 39
Vrijsen, J. N., Grafton, B., Koster, E. H. W., Lau, J. Y. F., Wittekind, C. E., Bar‐Haim, Y., Becker, E. S., Brotman, M. A., Joormann, J., Lazarov, A., et al. (2024) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2024.104557 · Cited by 42
A systematic review of event‐related potentials as outcome measures of attention bias modification
Carlson, J. M. (2021) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13801 · Cited by 34
Anxiety and depressive personality disorders in the modern world
Spytska, L. V. (2024) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104285 · Cited by 30
A review of attentional bias modification trainings for depression
Guo, L., Cai, X., Yang, Q., Cui, Q., Huang, L., Jing, X., & Wang, Y. (2022) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/cns.14022 · Cited by 29
Craske, M. G., Herzallah, M. M., Nusslock, R., & Patel, V. (2023) · Nature Mental Health · doi:10.1038/s44220-022-00012-w · Cited by 31
Interpretation of ambiguity in depression
Everaert, J. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.003 · Cited by 35
Cuijpers, P. J., Harrer, M., & Furukawa, T. A. (2026) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.70002 · Cited by 34
Self-citationCognitive processes predict worry and anxiety under different stressful situations
Feng, Y.-C., Krahé, C., Koster, E. H. W., Lau, J. Y. F., & Hirsch, C. R. (2022) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2022.104168 · Cited by 33
Cognitive bias modification for adult’s depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Li, J., Ma, H., Yang, H. J., Yu, H., & Zhang, N. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968638 · Cited by 28
Approach-Bias Retraining and Other Training Interventions as Add-On in the Treatment of AUD Patients
Wiers, R. W. H. J., Pan, T., Dessel, P. V., Rinck, M., & Lindenmeyer, J. (2023) · Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · doi:10.1007/7854_2023_421 · Cited by 31
Clinical efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions
Blackwell, S. E. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30170-x · Cited by 26
Jenness, J. L., Lambert, H. K., Bitrán, D., Blossom, J. B., Nook, E. C., Sasse, S. F., Somerville, L. H., & McLaughlin, K. A. (2021) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-020-00751-3 · Cited by 22
Attention allocation in OCD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking-based research
Basel, D., Hallel, H., Dar, R., & Lazarov, A. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.141 · Cited by 22
Sharpe, L., Jones, E. B., Pradhan, P., Todd, J., & Colagiuri, B. (2022) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002784 · Cited by 23
Top-down and Bottom-up Pathways to Developing Psychological Interventions
Cristea, I. A., Vecchi, T., & Cuijpers, P. J. (2021) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4793 · Cited by 21
Self-citationZhao, C., Wang, K., Li, D., Li, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., & Zhang, T. (2024) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-024-02062-4 · Cited by 20
Beevers, C. G., Hsu, K. J., Schnyer, D. M., Smits, J. A. J., & Shumake, J. (2021) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000683 · Cited by 20
Situated Affectivity and Mind Shaping: Lessons from Social Psychology
Walter, S., & Stephan, A. (2022) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/17540739221112419 · Cited by 24
Chan, F. H. F., Suen, H., Chan, A. B., Hsiao, J. H., & Barry, T. J. (2021) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.1853 · Cited by 19
Targeting automatic processes to reduce unhealthy behaviours: a process framework
Larsen, J. K., & Hollands, G. J. (2021) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2021.1876572 · Cited by 19
Schmidt, N. B., & Vereenooghe, L. (2021) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2021.103949 · Cited by 21
Farajzadeh, A., Goubran, M., Beehler, A., Cherkaoui, N., Morrison, P., de Chanaleilles, M., Maltagliati, S., Cheval, B., Miller, M. W., Sheehy, L., et al. (2023) · Peer Community Journal · doi:10.24072/pcjournal.246 · Cited by 19
Eberle, J. W., Daniel, K. E., Baee, S., Silverman, A. L., Lewis, E., Baglione, A. N., Werntz, A. J., French, N. J., Ji, J. L., Hohensee, N., et al. (2024) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000896 · Cited by 21
Does interpretation bias moderate the relationship between pain and fear of cancer recurrence?
Pradhan, P., Sharpe, L., Butow, P. N., Coutts‐Bain, D., & Heathcote, L. C. (2022) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0001217 · Cited by 19
Sicouri, G., Daniel, E. K., Spoelma, M. J., Salemink, E., McDermott, E. A., & Hudson, J. L. (2023) · JCPP Advances · doi:10.1002/jcv2.12207 · Cited by 18
Cognitive training for mental health problems
Hallion, L. S., Hsu, K. J., & Schleider, J. L. (2024) · Nature Mental Health · doi:10.1038/s44220-023-00185-y · Cited by 20
Interpretation bias modification for hostility: A randomized clinical trial.
van Teffelen, M. W., Lobbestael, J., Voncken, M. J., Cougle, J. R., & Peeters, F. P. M. L. (2021) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000651 · Cited by 17
Sociali, A., Borgi, M., Pettorruso, M., Carlo, F. D., Natale, C. D., Tambelli, A., Alessi, M. C., Ciavoni, L., Mosca, A., Miuli, A., et al. (2022) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.23263 · Cited by 18
Rogers, J., & Sicouri, G. (2022) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2022.04.006 · Cited by 17
Ciesinski, N. K., Himelein-Wachowiak, M., Krick, L. C., Sorgi, K. M., Cheung, J. C. Y., & McCloskey, M. S. (2023) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2023.104344 · Cited by 19
Büttner, C. M., & Greifeneder, R. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2024.100804 · Cited by 19
Development of a cognitive bias modification intervention for anxiety disorders in primary care
Weisberg, R. B., Gonsalves, M. A., Ramadurai, R., Braham, H., Fuchs, C. H., & Beard, C. (2021) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12281 · Cited by 19
O’Connor, C., Everaert, J., & Fitzgerald, A. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23186 · Cited by 18
Prior, K., Salemink, E., Wiers, R. W., Teachman, B. A., Piggott, M., Newton, N. C., Teesson, M., Baillie, A. J., Campbell, S., & Stapinski, L. A. (2020) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.14452 · Cited by 16
Interpretation bias and the transition from acute to chronic pain
Todd, J., Pickup, B., & Sharpe, L. (2023) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003016 · Cited by 17
Bø, R., Kraft, B., Jonassen, R., Harmer, C. J., Hilland, E., Stiles, T. C., Haaland, V. Ø., Aspesletten, M. E. B., Sletvold, H., & Landrø, N. I. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.04.027 · Cited by 15
Bas‐Hoogendam, J. M., van Steenbergen, H., Kadosh, K. C., Westenberg, P. M., & van der Wee, N. J. A. (2021) · EBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103445 · Cited by 14
Nieto, I., & Vázquez, C. (2021) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102459 · Cited by 14
Lessons Learned: Providing Supportive Accountability in an Online Anxiety Intervention
Werntz, A. J., Silverman, A. L., Behan, H. C., Patel, S. K., Beltzer, M., Boukhechba, M., Barnes, L. E., & Teachman, B. A. (2021) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2021.12.002 · Cited by 13
Alkan, E., Kumar, G., Ravichandran, S., Kaushal, S. R., de Pablo, G. S., Alerci, L., Michaud-Feinberg, J., Gutiérrez-Rojas, L., Zorzi, C., Klauser, P., et al. (2025) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116473 · Cited by 17
Positive Interpretation Bias Predicts Longitudinal Decreases in Social Anxiety
Bean, C. A. L., Everaert, J., & Ciesla, J. A. (2022) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2022.09.003 · Cited by 14
Blanco, I., Boemo, T., Martín-García, Ó., Koster, E. H. W., Raedt, R. D., & Sánchez-López, Á. (2023) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-023-00480-3 · Cited by 14
Interpretation bias in endometriosis-related pain
Pickup, B., Sharpe, L., & Todd, J. (2023) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002946 · Cited by 16
Steinman, S. A., Namaky, N., Toton, S. L., Meissel, E. E. E., John, A. T. S., Pham, N.-H., Werntz, A. J., Valladares, T. L., Gorlin, E. I., Arbus, S., et al. (2020) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-020-10168-3 · Cited by 14
Suppression May Improve Adaptation to Worry When Facing Uncertainty: Studying COVID-19 Pandemic
Khatibi, A., Sharpe, L., Dehghani, M., Ghalibaf, E., Hosseinchi, P., Mazidi, M., Ranjbar, S., Deldar, Z., Gevers‐Montoro, C., Alizadeh, P., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.778375 · Cited by 13
Carlson, J. M., Voltz, M., Foley, J., Gentry, L., & Fang, L. (2022) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-022-03471-3 · Cited by 14
Rooney, T., Sharpe, L., Todd, J., Michalski, S. C., Ryckeghem, D. M. L. V., Crombez, G., & Colagiuri, B. (2024) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102436 · Cited by 18
Attention Training as a Low-Intensity Treatment for Concerning Anxiety in Clinic-Referred Youth
Pettit, J. W., Rey, Y., Marin, C. E., Bechor, M., Lebowitz, E. R., Vasey, M. W., Jaccard, J. J., Abend, R., Pine, D. S., Bar‐Haim, Y., et al. (2022) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2022.07.004 · Cited by 13
Larrazabal, M. A., Eberle, J. W., Evia, Á. F. V. D. L. G., Boukhechba, M., Funk, D. H., Barnes, L. E., Boker, S. M., & Teachman, B. A. (2023) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2023.104463 · Cited by 13
Machulska, A., Kleinke, K., & Klucken, T. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01804-9 · Cited by 13
Brzozowski, A., & Crossey, B. P. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jbct.2024.100485 · Cited by 12
Kim, S. A., Hamann, S. B., & Kim, S. H. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118333 · Cited by 13
Bø, R., Kraft, B., Pedersen, M. L., Joormann, J., Jonassen, R., Osnes, K., Harmer, C. J., & Landrø, N. I. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291722003956 · Cited by 13
Attentional biases in anxiety and depression: current status and clinical considerations
Houwer, J. D., & Koster, E. H. W. (2023) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21117 · Cited by 13
Richter, T., Stahi, S., Mirovsky, G., Hel-Or, H. Z., & Okon‐Singer, H. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.035 · Cited by 11
Ouimet, A. J., Dixon‐Luinenburg, T., & Rooyakkers, M. (2020) · International Journal of Cognitive Therapy · doi:10.1007/s41811-020-00093-4 · Cited by 13
Myruski, S., Cho, H., Bikson, M., & Dennis‐Tiwary, T. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroergonomics · doi:10.3389/fnrgo.2021.652162 · Cited by 11
A systematic review of the literature on interpretation bias and its physiological correlates
Collins, A., Scott, R. B. Y., Hirsch, C. R., Ottaviani, C., Krahé, C., & Meeten, F. (2022) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108398 · Cited by 13
AlMoghrabi, N., Verhoef, R. E. J., Smeijers, D., Huijding, J., & van Dijk, A. (2023) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-023-10415-3 · Cited by 11
Current and Future Approaches to Pediatric Anxiety Disorder Treatment
Zugman, A., Winkler, A. M., Qamar, P., & Pine, D. S. (2024) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.20231037 · Cited by 16
Fernández‐Castilla, B., & Noortgate, W. V. D. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01905-5 · Cited by 11
Bovy, L., Ikani, N., van de Kraats, L., Dresler, M., Tendolkar, I., & Vrijsen, J. N. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-25379-9 · Cited by 10
Actas del III Congreso del Neolítico en la Península Ibérica: Santander, 5 a 8 de octubre de 2003
Peredo, R. O., Piñeiro, C. G.-M., & Cabal, P. A. (2005) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · Cited by 10
Beard, C., Beckham, E. E., Solomon, A., Fenley, A. R., & Pincus, D. B. (2021) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2021.09.005 · Cited by 9
Trait anxiety affects attentional bias to emotional stimuli across time: A growth curve analysis
Xing, C., Zhang, Y., Lü, H., Zhu, X., & Miao, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.972892 · Cited by 9
Dietel, F. A., Rupprecht, R., Seriyo, A. M., Post, M., Sudhoff, B., Reichart, J. S., Berking, M., & Buhlmann, U. (2024) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2024.100719 · Cited by 9
The effect of attention on body size adaptation and body dissatisfaction
House, T., Stephen, I. D., Penton‐Voak, I. S., & Brooks, K. R. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211718 · Cited by 8
Gradi, N., Chopin, A., Bavelier, D., Shechner, T., & Pichon, S. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-024-05515-7 · Cited by 12
Richter, T., Shani, R., Tal, S., Derakshan, N., Cohen, N., Enock, P. M., McNally, R. J., Mor, N., Daches, S., Williams, A. D., et al. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01449-w · Cited by 8
Avoidance of mild threat observed in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) using eye tracking
Nelson, A. L., Quigley, L., Carriere, J. S. A., Kalles, E., Smilek, D., & Purdon, C. L. (2022) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102577 · Cited by 8
Distinct Effects of Anxiety and Depression on Updating Emotional Information in Working Memory
Zhang, Y., Boemo, T., Qiao, Z., Tan, Y., & Li, X. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20010544 · Cited by 16
Grocott, B. B., Battaglini, A. M., Jopling, E. N., Tracy, A., Rnic, K., Sánchez-López, Á., & LeMoult, J. (2023) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.12231 · Cited by 11
Daglas‐Georgiou, R., Bryce, S., Smith, G., Kaur, M., Cheng, N., de Rozario, M. R., Wood, S. J., & Allott, K. (2021) · Early Intervention in Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/eip.13248 · Cited by 8
Shifting Episodic Prediction With Online Cognitive Bias Modification: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Eberle, J. W., Boukhechba, M., Sun, J., Zhang, D., Funk, D. H., Barnes, L. E., & Teachman, B. A. (2023) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026221103128 · Cited by 8
Li, S., Lin, Y., Liu, P., & Xing, S. (2023) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107272 · Cited by 11
Earleywine, M., Oliva, A. B., Leo, J. A. D., & Banks, R. (2024) · Journal of Psychedelic Studies · doi:10.1556/2054.2024.00265 · Cited by 8
Moderators and Mediators of the Interpretation Bias–Emotional Disorders Link
Polack, R. G., Davis, A. L., & Joormann, J. (2023) · CBT: science into practice · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23650-1_4 · Cited by 7
Baee, S., Eberle, J. W., Baglione, A. N., Spears, T., Lewis, E., Wang, H., Funk, D., Teachman, B. A., & Barnes, L. E. (2024) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/51567 · Cited by 8
Chen, R., Zheng, J., Li, T., Zhang, Q., Li, C., & Cui, L. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01094-4 · Cited by 7
Isnaini, M. Z., Sivalingam, M., Radhakrishnan, A. K., Jaafar, F., & Abidin, S. A. Z. (2024) · Neuropeptides · doi:10.1016/j.npep.2024.102447 · Cited by 6
Carlson, J. M., Fang, L., & Andrzejewski, J. A. (2021) · Neuroimage Reports · doi:10.1016/j.ynirp.2021.100067 · Cited by 6
Cognitive bias modification of inferential flexibility
Perlman, B., & Mor, N. (2022) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2022.104128 · Cited by 6
Wang, Y., Zhang, X., Gao, J., Zhang, L., & Jiang, J. (2022) · PsyCh Journal · doi:10.1002/pchj.581 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Fodor, L. A., Georgescu, R., Cuijpers, P., Szamoskozi, Ş., David, D., Furukawa, T. A., & Cristea, I. A.
- Affiliations
- Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- University of Pavia (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Cristea, Ioana A
- Venue
- The Lancet Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 506-514
- ISSN
- 2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3028515698
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science
- Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii (PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2016-1054)
- Meso Scale Diagnostics
- Conseil National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cognitive bias modification, attentional bias modification, interpretation bias modification, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, depression, anxiety, treatment efficacy, risk of bias, heterogeneity
- MeSH terms
- Network Meta-Analysis, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Reproducibility of Results, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Bias, Case-Control Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
