The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health-related quality of life in patients with triple-class exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with idecabtagene vicleucel or standard regimens: patient-reported outcomes from the phase 3, randomised, open-label KarMMa-3 clinical trial
Abstract
Background Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) showed significantly improved progression-free survival compared with standard regimens in adults with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who had received two to four previous regimens in the ongoing phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial (NCT03651128). This study analysed patient-reported outcomes (PROs), a KarMMa-3 secondary endpoint. Methods In the randomised, open-label, phase 3 KarMMa-3 trial, 386 patients in hospitals (≥18 years of age, with measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, who had received two to four previous regimens-including an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor, and daratumumab-and had documented disease progression after receiving their last dose of the last therapy) were randomly assigned to ide-cel (n=254) or standard regimens (daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone; daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone; ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone; carfilzomib and dexamethasone; or elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone; n=132). Patients were expected to complete the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life C30 Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY20), EQ 5 dimensions (EQ-5D), and EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline and follow-up timepoints (data cutoff April 18, 2022). PROs included nine prespecified primary domains: EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS-quality of life (QoL), physical functioning, cognitive functioning, fatigue, and pain; QLQ-MY20 disease symptoms and side effects of treatment; and five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) index score and EQ-5D visual VAS. Differences in overall least-squares mean changes from baseline to month 20 were analysed using post-hoc constrained longitudinal data analysis. Time to confirmed improvement or deterioration from baseline was analysed using Cox proportional hazard models. Findings Patients were randomly assigned between May 6, 2019, and April 8, 2022. Overall, the median age was 63 years (IQR 55-68); 151 (39%) patients were female; and 250 (65%) patients were White, 36 (9%) Black or African American, 19 (5%) Hispanic or Latino, 12 (3%) Asian, and seven (2%) of other race. The median follow-up was 18·6 months (IQR 14·0-26·4). PRO compliance was higher than 75% throughout. Overall least-squares mean changes from baseline favoured ide-cel with Hedges' g effect sizes from 0·3 to 0·7 for most domains. Patients in the ide-cel group showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements across the primary PRO domains of interest, with the exception of QLQ-MY20 disease symptoms, side effects of treatment, and EQ-5D-5L index score, which showed improvement across assessment visits but did not exceed the within-group minimally important difference thresholds. The ide-cel group had shorter times to clinically meaningful improvement than the standard regimens group in QLQ-C30 domains except in role functioning, diarrhoea, and financial difficulties; in QLQ-MY20 domains except body image; and in EQ-5D-VAS. Interpretation Ide-cel offers improved health-related quality of life compared with standard regimens for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma after previous lines of therapy. The PRO data highlight the extended QoL benefits of a one-time infusion with ide-cel compared with continuous treatment with standard regimens in the treatment of triple-class exposed patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Funding 2seventy bio and Celgene, a Bristol Myers Squibb Company.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With additional follow-up since the initial analysis of PROs, patients who received ide-cel continued to show sustained and clinically meaningful improvements in PROs, including pain, physical functioning, and fatigue, vs standard regimens.
“With additional follow-up since an analysis of PROs in the IA, 28 patients who received ide-cel continued to show sustained and clinically meaningful improvements in PROs, including pain, physical functioning, and fatigue, vs SRs.”
From Ide-cel vs standard regimens in triple-class-exposed relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: updated KarMMa-3 analyses. (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Citations
Cites
Idecabtagene Vicleucel in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Munshi, N. C., Anderson, L. D., Shah, N., Madduri, D., Berdeja, J., Lonial, S., Raje, N., Lin, Y., Siegel, D., Oriol, A., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2024850 · Cited by 2,560
Self-citationSelf-Reported Population Health: An International Perspective Based on EQ-5D
Szende, A., Janssen, M. B., Cabasés, J. M., & Ramos Goñi, J. M. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.812 · Cited by 196
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Despiegel, 2019, Health-related quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma treated in routine clinical practice in France, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 19, e13, 10.1016/j.clml.2018.08.019 · DOI
- Kamal, 2021, Symptom burden and its functional impact in patients with “symptomatic” relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, Support Care Cancer, 29, 467
- Dimopoulos, 2020, Health-related quality of life in heavily pre-treated and renally impaired patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma receiving isatuximab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone: the ICARIA-MM study, EHA Library, 293518
- Moreau, 2019, Convenience, satisfaction, health-related quality of life of once-weekly 70 mg/m2 vs. twice-weekly 27 mg/m2 carfilzomib (randomized A.R.R.O.W. study), Leukemia, 33, 2934, 10.1038/s41375-019-0480-2 · DOI
- Richardson, 2018, Patient-reported outcomes of multiple myeloma patients treated with panobinostat after ≥2 lines of therapy based on the international phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled PANARAMA-1 trial, Br J Haematol, 181, 628, 10.1111/bjh.15248 · DOI
- Song, 2015, Health-related quality of life from the MM-003 trial of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma, Haematologica, 100, e63, 10.3324/haematol.2014.112557 · DOI
- Gandhi, 2019, Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma refractory to CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody therapy, Leukemia, 33, 2266, 10.1038/s41375-019-0435-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Lee, 2023, Treatment patterns, survival, quality of life, and healthcare resource use among patients with triple-class refractory multiple myeloma in US clinical practice: findings from the Connect MM Disease Registry, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 23, 112, 10.1016/j.clml.2022.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Rodríguez-Otero, 2023, Ide-cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, N Engl J Med, 388, 1002, 10.1056/NEJMoa2213614 · DOI · Paper page
- Anderson, 2021, Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121), a BCMA-directed CAR T cell therapy, in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: updated KarMMa results, J Clin Oncol, 39, 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.8016 · DOI
- Delforge, 2022, Health-related quality of life with idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, Blood Adv, 6, 1309, 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005913 · DOI
- Delforge, 2023, Analysis of patient-reported experiences up to 2 years after receiving idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: longitudinal findings from the phase 2 KarMMa trial, Leuk Res, 129, 10.1016/j.leukres.2023.107074 · DOI
- Weisel, 2020, Health-related quality-of-life results from the phase 3 OPTIMISMM study: pomalidomide, bortezomib, and low-dose dexamethasone versus bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, Leuk Lymphoma, 61, 1850, 10.1080/10428194.2020.1747066 · DOI
- Calvert, 2013, The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice, Health Qual Life Outcomes, 11, 184, 10.1186/1477-7525-11-184 · DOI
- Siegel, 2021, Health-related quality of life outcomes from the CANDOR study in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, Leuk Lymphoma, 62, 3002, 10.1080/10428194.2021.1941927 · DOI
- Hungria, 2021, Health-related quality of life maintained over time in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with daratumumab in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone: results from the phase III CASTOR trial, Br J Haematol, 193, 561, 10.1111/bjh.17321 · DOI
- Ludwig, 2019, Health-related quality of life in the ENDEAVOR study: carfilzomib-dexamethasone vs bortezomib-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, Blood Cancer J, 9, 23, 10.1038/s41408-019-0181-0 · DOI
- Li, 2017, An introduction to multiplicity issues in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how, Int J Epidemiol, 46, 746
- Detry, 2016, Analyzing repeated measurements using mixed models, JAMA, 315, 407, 10.1001/jama.2015.19394 · DOI
- Coens, 2020, International standards for the analysis of quality-of-life and patient-reported outcome endpoints in cancer randomised controlled trials: recommendations of the SISAQOL Consortium, Lancet Oncol, 21, e83, 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30790-9 · DOI
- Nolte, 2019, General population normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 health-related quality of life questionnaire based on 15,386 persons across 13 European countries, Canada and the United States, Eur J Cancer, 107, 153, 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.024 · DOI
- Cocks, 2023, How scoring limits the usability of minimal important differences (MIDs) as responder definition (RD): an exemplary demonstration using EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales, Qual Life Res, 32, 1247, 10.1007/s11136-022-03181-4 · DOI
- Cocks, 2011, Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, J Clin Oncol, 29, 89, 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.0107 · DOI
- Cocks, 2012, Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, Eur J Cancer, 48, 1713, 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.059 · DOI
- Sully, 2019, Estimation of minimally important differences and responder definitions for EORTC QLQ-MY20 scores in multiple myeloma patients, Eur J Haematol, 103, 500, 10.1111/ejh.13316 · DOI
- Pickard, 2007, Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer, Health Qual Life Outcomes, 5, 70, 10.1186/1477-7525-5-70 · DOI
- Cohen, 1992, A power primer, Psychol Bull, 112, 155, 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ailawadhi, S., Arnulf, B., Patel, K., Cavo, M., Nooka, A. K., Manier, S., Callander, N., Costa, L. J., Vij, R., Bahlis, N. J., et al. (2024) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2024024582 · Cited by 79
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Delforge, M., Patel, K., Eliason, L., Dhanda, D., Shi, L., Guo, S., Marshall, T. S., Arnulf, B., Cavo, M., Nooka, A., Manier, S., Callander, N., Giralt, S., Einsele, H., Ailawadhi, S., Popa McKiver, M., Cook, M., & Rodríguez-Otero, P.
- Affiliations
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) (US)
- Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR)
- Emory University (US)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR)
- University of Wisconsin System (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Bristol-Myers Squibb (Switzerland) (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Delforge, Michel
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Lancet Haematology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e216-e227
- ISSN
- 2352-3026 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392215371
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2024-05-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The Lancet Haematology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Celgene
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, idecabtagene vicleucel, CAR T-cell therapy, health-related quality of life, patient-reported outcomes, EORTC QLQ-C30, EQ-5D, physical function, fatigue, pain, cognitive function, treatment side effects
- MeSH terms
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dexamethasone, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Quality of Life, Thalidomide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review